Fire Lavin!

[JohnnyFan]

At this point, if Lavin does not land both Thomas and Cunningham you would have to say the 2014 recruiting effort is his worst to date.

ever think of changing your handle to johnnysunshine ?

I am a pragmatist who prefers to be positive. Thanks for your suggestion.

 

[GardenCity62]

You are right but comparing recruiting successful years is difficult because potential recruits consider playing time so important. That meant recruiting backcourt players very difficult this year and our chances of getting Thomas/Cunningham are enhanced because of Sampson's leaving.

 

[JohnnyFan]

You are right but comparing recruiting successful years is difficult because potential recruits consider playing time so important. That meant recruiting backcourt players very difficult this year and our chances of getting Thomas/Cunningham are enhanced because of Sampson's leaving.

Fair point about the backcourt. However, we had front court playing time to offer throughout the 2014 recruiting season (Gift, Sanchez).

 

[SJUalum98]

Can we just let things play out first?

 

[Jack Williams]

Can we just let things play out first?

Exactly. It's useless and a waste of time and energy criticizing a recruiting class that isn't even finished yet.

 

[JohnnyFan]

Can we just let things play out first?

Ah.....the quote I have been hearing since November.

 

[redken]

Can we just let things play out first?

Ah.....the quote I have been hearing since November.

And the annual recruiting cycle is from when to when?

 

[frank61]

I would love to see Coach Lavin get both guys for two reasons. One it would would improve our team dramatically, and second to shut some posters up because they would be cleaning the egg off their faces. It gets old after a while.

 

[MJDinkins]

I would love to see Coach Lavin get both guys for two reasons. One it would would improve our team dramatically, and second to shut some posters up because they would be cleaning the egg off their faces. It gets old after a while.

One of the constant rabble-rousers should be exiled, as he's been banned numerous times before. He can take his roadie with him. I digress.

 

[rawdognyc]

I would love to see Coach Lavin get both guys for two reasons. One it would would improve our team dramatically, and second to shut some posters up because they would be cleaning the egg off their faces. It gets old after a while.

One of the constant rabble-rousers should be exiled, as he's been banned numerous times before. He can take his roadie with him. I digress.

It's a joke that this person is allowed to flame this bored and hijack every thread with his same bs. One trick pony.

 

[rawdognyc]

I would love to see Coach Lavin get both guys for two reasons. One it would would improve our team dramatically, and second to shut some posters up because they would be cleaning the egg off their faces. It gets old after a while.

Frank, it wouldn't matter if he signed 3 top 10 players. They will bitch about Lavin no matter what. I'm still hoping Paul will figure out how to get the block function to work.... It would make the board so much better. I don't mind people with difference in opinions, but to just come on to every thread strictly just to bash the staff is beyond old, tiresome and pathetic

 

[JohnnyFan]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

 

[Jack Williams]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

People telling you to stop are not lavin supporters. People telling you to stop are just regular posters tired of seeing every thread derailed by lavin hate. Do I like lavin? Nope, not at all, but it's brought up in every thread, a lot of times by you and a few others. And today I guess there weren't any other threads to hijack so you decided to resurrect his thread from the dead, it's just getting so old, we get your point, it has been made over and over, let's move on.

 

[JohnnyFan]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

People telling you to stop are not lavin supporters. People telling you to stop are just regular posters tired of seeing every thread derailed by lavin hate. Do I like lavin? Nope, not at all, but it's brought up in every thread, a lot of times by you and a few others. And today I guess there weren't any other threads to hijack so you decided to resurrect his thread from the dead, it's just getting so old, we get your point, it has been made over and over, let's move on.

Respectfully disagree. My suggestion is to not read posts that may upset you. By the way, I have no plans on asking you to post differently. I just think that would be presumptuous and a waste of a post.

 

[MJDinkins]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

People telling you to stop are not lavin supporters. People telling you to stop are just regular posters tired of seeing every thread derailed by lavin hate. Do I like lavin? Nope, not at all, but it's brought up in every thread, a lot of times by you and a few others. And today I guess there weren't any other threads to hijack so you decided to resurrect his thread from the dead, it's just getting so old, we get your point, it has been made over and over, let's move on.

Don't sweat it, Jack. A typical realfan reply when he's been figured out. Go and look back at all his screennames prior to him being banned, and the reply is similar to the one above. A few words may be different, but the delivery and tone of the posts are nearly identical. He also becomes very defensive (like he's doing now).

It's generally easy to figure him out.

 

[JohnnyFan]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

People telling you to stop are not lavin supporters. People telling you to stop are just regular posters tired of seeing every thread derailed by lavin hate. Do I like lavin? Nope, not at all, but it's brought up in every thread, a lot of times by you and a few others. And today I guess there weren't any other threads to hijack so you decided to resurrect his thread from the dead, it's just getting so old, we get your point, it has been made over and over, let's move on.

Don't sweat it, Jack. A typical realfan reply when he's been figured out. Go and look back at all his screennames prior to him being banned, and the reply is similar to the one above. A few words may be different, but the delivery and tone of the posts are nearly identical. He's also becomes very defensive.

It's generally easy to figure him out.

Dinkins.....I joined the board approximately one year ago and have had two screen names (James/JohnnyFan). You seem extremely confident that I am a previously banned poster, but I am not. I am not sure how else to prove it, so I won't try.

 

[MJDinkins]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

People telling you to stop are not lavin supporters. People telling you to stop are just regular posters tired of seeing every thread derailed by lavin hate. Do I like lavin? Nope, not at all, but it's brought up in every thread, a lot of times by you and a few others. And today I guess there weren't any other threads to hijack so you decided to resurrect his thread from the dead, it's just getting so old, we get your point, it has been made over and over, let's move on.

Don't sweat it, Jack. A typical realfan reply when he's been figured out. Go and look back at all his screennames prior to him being banned, and the reply is similar to the one above. A few words may be different, but the delivery and tone of the posts are nearly identical. He's also becomes very defensive.

It's generally easy to figure him out.

Dinkins.....I joined the board approximately one year ago and have had two screen names (James/JohnnyFan). You seem extremely confident that I am a previously banned poster, but I am not. I am not sure how else to prove it, so I won't try.

Yeah.... Nice try.

 

[JohnnyFan]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

People telling you to stop are not lavin supporters. People telling you to stop are just regular posters tired of seeing every thread derailed by lavin hate. Do I like lavin? Nope, not at all, but it's brought up in every thread, a lot of times by you and a few others. And today I guess there weren't any other threads to hijack so you decided to resurrect his thread from the dead, it's just getting so old, we get your point, it has been made over and over, let's move on.

Don't sweat it, Jack. A typical realfan reply when he's been figured out. Go and look back at all his screennames prior to him being banned, and the reply is similar to the one above. A few words may be different, but the delivery and tone of the posts are nearly identical. He's also becomes very defensive.

It's generally easy to figure him out.

Dinkins.....I joined the board approximately one year ago and have had two screen names (James/JohnnyFan). You seem extremely confident that I am a previously banned poster, but I am not. I am not sure how else to prove it, so I won't try.

Yeah.... Nice try.

Weird.

 

[MJDinkins]

As mentioned by some others (see the Big East Coaches thread), I find it interesting that many who support Lavin choose to engage in this crusade to censor the opposing view. What is getting old are the threats of banning and blocking, when no board rules have been broken. You can have your opinion, fine. I don't agree with it, and I don't understand it.........but it's yours. When/if your opinion bothers me to the point of frustration, I will stop reading your posts. I love the freedom.

People telling you to stop are not lavin supporters. People telling you to stop are just regular posters tired of seeing every thread derailed by lavin hate. Do I like lavin? Nope, not at all, but it's brought up in every thread, a lot of times by you and a few others. And today I guess there weren't any other threads to hijack so you decided to resurrect his thread from the dead, it's just getting so old, we get your point, it has been made over and over, let's move on.

Don't sweat it, Jack. A typical realfan reply when he's been figured out. Go and look back at all his screennames prior to him being banned, and the reply is similar to the one above. A few words may be different, but the delivery and tone of the posts are nearly identical. He's also becomes very defensive.

It's generally easy to figure him out.

Dinkins.....I joined the board approximately one year ago and have had two screen names (James/JohnnyFan). You seem extremely confident that I am a previously banned poster, but I am not. I am not sure how else to prove it, so I won't try.

Yeah.... Nice try.

Weird.

That you are.

 

[Jack Williams]

Whether johnnyfan resembles real fan or not, there's no proof he is. While I find him a bit repetitive when it comes to lavin, he still is a good poster. There's no reason to label him as realfan, i don't think he is....