not a horrible golferI could write plenty of cons, but I'm only going to go with the pros in this post for Mike Anderson and his tenure:
1. None of his four seasons have been complete embarrassments unlike a few of his predecessors.
2. His assistants have helped mend some local fences in recruiting, and the team has more key NY-area kids than in regimes past.
3. Two lightly recruited NY kids have become stars under his watch: Champagnie and Soriano.
4. There has not been a scandal.
5. He is a gentleman, a family man and a good public representative of SJU.
More?
 
				 
 
		 
			
		
		
		
	
	
			
		 
			
		
		
		
	
	
			
		 
 
		 
 
		 . Coaches get rewarded for who they get Mike, not who they almost get. As disappointed as I am in CMA, Lav was never going to be the long term solution.
. Coaches get rewarded for who they get Mike, not who they almost get. As disappointed as I am in CMA, Lav was never going to be the long term solution. 
 
		

