The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
Lavin will probably never admit to this (I wouldn't expect anyone to), but I think, if he had to do it again, he would have resigned after his father died (at the end of that season, anyway).
He just never appeared to be the same man after that, at least not publically.
I wish him luck. He laid a good foundation for Mullin to build upon.Lavin in late stages of negotiations with Fox Sports.
I know what you are saying. Not that he left Mullin with a deep roster, but that he restored the program to respectability. He inherited a first round NIT loser, which was the pinnacle of Robert's success after 6 seasons of miserable play in conference, and left Mullin with a team that went to the NCAA's twice in 5 years. The expectation for Mullin to succeed is, as a result higher than it was for Lavin.
Beast, I think your intentions are good, but you are reaching to find reason to complement Lavin on his way out. He really didn't build a foundation for future success.
He raised the profile of the program, and excited the fanbase to some degree.
But going forward you're only as good as your future players. And our cupboard was essentially left bare.
And it's not like his successes on the court were momentous enough to leave an impression on future recruits. We weren't reaching sweet 16s or hanging banners.
Lavin left the program better off than he found it, but not by much.
There were peaks and valleys during his tenure, and unfortunately he left at a low point.
I wish him luck. He laid a good foundation for Mullin to build upon.Lavin in late stages of negotiations with Fox Sports.
I know what you are saying. Not that he left Mullin with a deep roster, but that he restored the program to respectability. He inherited a first round NIT loser, which was the pinnacle of Robert's success after 6 seasons of miserable play in conference, and left Mullin with a team that went to the NCAA's twice in 5 years. The expectation for Mullin to succeed is, as a result higher than it was for Lavin.
Beast, I think your intentions are good, but you are reaching to find reason to complement Lavin on his way out. He really didn't build a foundation for future success.
He raised the profile of the program, and excited the fanbase to some degree.
But going forward you're only as good as your future players. And our cupboard was essentially left bare.
And it's not like his successes on the court were momentous enough to leave an impression on future recruits. We weren't reaching sweet 16s or hanging banners.
Lavin left the program better off than he found it, but not by much.
There were peaks and valleys during his tenure, and unfortunately he left at a low point.
I am not responding directly to you, since there are two or three similar responses, I'll do it globally. As far as what Roberts left Lavin, please remember that if Roberts coached a 6th season, the odds of him taking that team to the NCAA's with Hardy and Brownlee as bench players and Sean Evans as a starter would be pretty astronomical. As far as I'm concerned, Lavin took lemons and made lemonade. Nothing that Roberts did suggested this was an NCAA tourney team, yet many of you choose to give Roberts the credit though Lavin's staff made the adjustments to make them a fine team.
As far as Redmannorth's comments, the only reason Roberts get drawn in is the comparison of exiting coaches. Lavin took over a program that made the NIT once in 7 seasons, and left the program as one that made the NCAA's twice in five seasons.
He recruited deep into the top 100, something we doubted could ever happen again before Lavin took over. Some college coaches quietly suggested SJU should leave the Big East and join a mid major conference.
Admittedly Lavin's recruiting the past two years stunk, no even worse, but he did land Sampson and came very close to Diallo. So far, Mullin has done a wonderful job of mopping up what was left of uncommitted guys, transfers, and jucos.
So, yes, Lavin left Mullin with a depleted roster, but there was a hair of a chance that he could have had Jordan, Obekpa, and Sampson as the big three on next season's roster. Trust me, I agree it was time for him to go if he wanted $2 million a year, but overwhelmingly Redmen.com voted to have him back for next season when surveyed at the end of the campaign.
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
Correct and congratulations for going one further than umpteen.
I would have re-voted if I knew that Mullin was in the wings. I suspect many others would have as well.
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
Correct and congratulations for going one further than umpteen.
I would have re-voted if I knew that Mullin was in the wings. I suspect many others would have as well.
You opened a thread about coach Lavin. And Beast, very rationally I might add, posted about his legacy here and what he thinks Lavin left for Mullin. Am I not allowed to respond? Is otis?
No one is setting the record straight for the umpteenth time. We're talking about the legacy of a former coach.
People need to get over their anxiety towards any posts discussing critiques of Steve Lavin.
When its offtopic or trolling, feel free to ask the mods to remove it. But too often posters are complaining about normal debate/conversation.
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
Correct and congratulations for going one further than umpteen.
I would have re-voted if I knew that Mullin was in the wings. I suspect many others would have as well.
You opened a thread about coach Lavin. And Beast, very rationally I might add, posted about his legacy here and what he thinks Lavin left for Mullin. Am I not allowed to respond? Is otis?
No one is setting the record straight for the umpteenth time. We're talking about the legacy of a former coach.
People need to get over their anxiety towards any posts discussing critiques of Steve Lavin.
When its offtopic or trolling, feel free to ask the mods to remove it. But too often posters are complaining about normal debate/conversation.
Who would you rather live on your block now in the city. Ann Coulter or Lavin ?
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
Correct and congratulations for going one further than umpteen.
I would have re-voted if I knew that Mullin was in the wings. I suspect many others would have as well.
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
Correct and congratulations for going one further than umpteen.
I would have re-voted if I knew that Mullin was in the wings. I suspect many others would have as well.
You opened a thread about coach Lavin. And Beast, very rationally I might add, posted about his legacy here and what he thinks Lavin left for Mullin. Am I not allowed to respond? Is otis?
No one is setting the record straight for the umpteenth time. We're talking about the legacy of a former coach.
People need to get over their anxiety towards any posts discussing critiques of Steve Lavin.
When its offtopic or trolling, feel free to ask the mods to remove it. But too often posters are complaining about normal debate/conversation.
Who would you rather live on your block now in the city. Ann Coulter or Lavin ?
Not even close Mike! SL
I hope he lands a good tv gig. I have my complaints, but I wish him well.
The other one..... she might actually be evil.
She said today that it was depresssing (and Obamas fault) that more Americans watched the womens' soccer game last night than did the Kentucky derby.
Good luck understanding that haha
Secondly Lavin inherited a good team, five years later Lavin left a four man roster that combined for 10 points a game for next year.
No coach in the history of the program has ever left it in worse shape.
If not for the superb recruiting job our incomplete staff has done to date we would win 5 games next season. The only expectation we have for this staff to succeed is based on their superb effort that they have put in to date. Lavin's recruiting the past three seasons was nothing short of pathetic.
Secondly Lavin inherited a good team, five years later Lavin left a four man roster that combined for 10 points a game for next year.
No coach in the history of the program has ever left it in worse shape.
If not for the superb recruiting job our incomplete staff has done to date we would win 5 games next season. The only expectation we have for this staff to succeed is based on their superb effort that they have put in to date. Lavin's recruiting the past three seasons was nothing short of pathetic.
Norm left us Ron Roberts and 10 seniors. That meant a complete overhaul in year 2 and a totally unbalanced roster full of freshmen. Yes, Lavin should have done a better job balancing it out with JUCOs and transfers but Norm basically left us with a complete rebuild, no NBA players, and no NCAA success. He started at the bottom too trying to clean up the mess Jarvis left us (which one could argue was the worst ever).
Lavin left us with Sampson, Doughty, Barnes-Thompkins, Felix, Amar, Jordan, and Obepka. Not great but not the worst either. His job was not to leave the next guy with a great roster, it was to win games. He didn't do enough of that so he was fired.
We can't fire him again but yet we forget that he also left us as a finalist for Diallo, Lovett basically locked up, a shot at Mussini and Papa. If Amar's cousin or the big man from Our Savior comes one could say Lavin helped there too.
He recruited the schools 3rd all time leading scorer and best ever shot blocker. Those are places in our record books that will remain for a while. He also helped put 2 guys in the NBA for a school that was not getting NBA talent. I'd bet Pointer makes it this year and Obepka and Sheed will have a shot next year. Say what you want but this helps the program. Turn on a game and see St John's under an NBA player's stats and it's free advertising.
I'm pretty sure we would have put a similar or better roster on the floor next year if he wasn't fired. Lovett, Mussini, Sampson, Obepka and Papa or Diallo was very possible. No one knows for sure what the roster would have looked like but yet we criticize based upon speculation.
At the same time , I'm also confident that Chris will do better with the roster we have and that we are in better hands for the future. That's why I'd also change my vote had I known we would have replaced Lavin with Chris, Slice, and Matt A. I'm not going to pretend that the guy was awful though. I'd prefer to thank him for his contributions and move on. Why can't some of you do the same?
The 35% have set the record straight for the umpteenth time.
35% that apparently included President Gempeshaw and the Board of Trustees.
Correct and congratulations for going one further than umpteen.
I would have re-voted if I knew that Mullin was in the wings. I suspect many others would have as well.
I would have maintained my vote if Mickey Mouse was in the wings.
When discussing Lavins legacy I definitely go both ways. I think he raised the excitement surrounding the program. The overall buzz and exposure improved.
When discussing Lavins legacy I definitely go both ways. I think he raised the excitement surrounding the program. The overall buzz and exposure improved.
Was there any real buzz outside this board beyond that first season, though?
There were some exciting moments for our fans after that season, but no one outside of New York cared. I'm sure Lavin is a nice guy, but he couldn't coach his way out of a paper bag. This was the best gig for him, if for no other reason than he was following a guy who couldn't coach his way out of a wet paper bag.