Welcome back Julian!

When it comes to mid to late 2nd round picks said:
OhioFan post=435483 said:
[URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nba/2021-aggregate-nba-mock-draft-6-0-updates-after-lottery/ar-AALtFCz?ocid[/URL]=msedgntp]2021 aggregate NBA mock draft 6.0: Updates after lottery (msn.com)[/url]

See third paragraph after photo
Here's the original article that list the top 82 players based on average of all the top mock draft sites.

[URL]https://hoopshype.com/lists/nba-mock-draft-prospect-rankings-combine-lotto-pistons-rockets/[/URL]

Just from reading, it appears Julian is considered a top 100 guy, but not among the top 60.  I keep seeing local reporters like Zach saying he's likely to be a mid-late 2nd round pick if he stays, but the top mock draft sites that do this for a living don't seem to think that.

ESPN Mock draft which is done by Draftexpress which is by far the most credible/popular mock draft site has him updated at #86.

[URL]https://www.espn.com/nba/draft/bestavailable/_/position/ovr/page/4[/URL]

And nbadraft.net which is probably the 2nd most popular mock draft site, who updates their mock draft all throughout the year has him at #88.

[URL]https://www.nbadraft.net/ranking/bigboard/[/URL]



 
 
QueensToCali post=435503 said:
When it comes to mid to late 2nd round picks said:
When it comes to mid to late 2nd round picks, the individual team workouts are most important and mock drafts / rankings become unreliable.  All it takes is for Julian to have one extremely impressive workout and a team with a shooting need to fall in love with him.  A team with a late 2nd round pick may then tell him that they will draft him if he's still available and with that guarantee he likely stays in the draft.  Without that guarantee he comes back...
Do you have any examples of a player that most mock sites had ranked in the 80's and 90's on the top draft sites a month before the draft and ended up getting drafted?  Because I follow the draft every year and I can't think of any of the top of my head, I'm sure there's a couple of examples, but it's not that common.  Draftexpress is usually pretty accurate on where GM's see certain players at.

And while workouts are important to perform well at. You have to remember by the time a player has worked out for a team in June/July they've already watched hundreds if not thousands of hours of that player playing. If they have several people ahead of him on their list, and that player has one better workout than them, they are not going to toss out all of the prior research they've done based on one workout.  If that was the case you wouldn't see a lot of players that are guranteed to get drafted in the first round/early 2nd round skipping 5v5 scrimmages and only choosing to workout for certain teams. Workouts are more or less just like an interview, they play against chairs and cones they just run around and do drills and maybe do some light scrimmaging at the end, it's not going to jump you 30 spots in a pecking order.
 
Duke of Earlington post=435488 said:
Bad measurables plus his 5-13 bad shooting in the 2nd scrimmage did nothing to help his stock.  

The smartest thing would be for him to have another great year in college hoops and go back to the combine next year.

I was leaning towards him leaving but now I am back to thinking he will return to SJU.
 
[video]https://thumbs.gfycat.com/HonorableOldDartfrog-size_restricted.gif[/video]
 
CBB players we're watching who may pull out of NBA Draft prior to July 7 deadline:
Johnny Juzang
Ochai Agbaji
Josh Primo
Hunter Dickinson
Julian Champagnie
Joe Wieskamp
Ron Harper Jr.
EJ Liddell
Aaron Wiggins

@CollHoopsChat
Remy Martin
Jaden Shackelford
Isaiah Mobley
Jalen Wilson
Isaiah Wong
 
Paultzman post=435561 said:
CBB players we're watching who may pull out of NBA Draft prior to July 7 deadline:
Johnny Juzang
Ochai Agbaji
Josh Primo
Hunter Dickinson
Julian Champagnie
Joe Wieskamp
Ron Harper Jr.
EJ Liddell
Aaron Wiggins

@CollHoopsChat
Remy Martin
Jaden Shackelford
Isaiah Mobley
Jalen Wilson
Isaiah Wong


I am surprised Dawson Garcia is not on that list since he just entered the portal
 
 
Anthony Mattia post=435562 said:
Paultzman post=435561 said:
CBB players we're watching who may pull out of NBA Draft prior to July 7 deadline:
Johnny Juzang
Ochai Agbaji
Josh Primo
Hunter Dickinson
Julian Champagnie
Joe Wieskamp
Ron Harper Jr.
EJ Liddell
Aaron Wiggins

@CollHoopsChat
Remy Martin
Jaden Shackelford
Isaiah Mobley
Jalen Wilson
Isaiah Wong


I am surprised Dawson Garcia is not on that list since he just entered the portal

 
He already removed his name.
 
Making Plays post=435564 said:
Anthony Mattia post=435562 said:
Paultzman post=435561 said:
CBB players we're watching who may pull out of NBA Draft prior to July 7 deadline:
Johnny Juzang
Ochai Agbaji
Josh Primo
Hunter Dickinson
Julian Champagnie
Joe Wieskamp
Ron Harper Jr.
EJ Liddell
Aaron Wiggins

@CollHoopsChat
Remy Martin
Jaden Shackelford
Isaiah Mobley
Jalen Wilson
Isaiah Wong


I am surprised Dawson Garcia is not on that list since he just entered the portal


 
He already removed his name.

That was fast.   Thanks 
 
 
Hes coming back.  He did not put up explosive enough numbers to entice the nba guys.

Come back, win big east player of the year and try the nba again next year.
 
John Fanta on SJU & Julian

“That is the key. If he comes back, St. John’s is a top five team in the Big East, if not top three or four. If he does not come back, I can’t put them there, knowing how much instant offense he provided for that team. I still expect Julian Champagnie will come back to St. John's. I still am leaning toward that point of view. That’s what I've heard, but things could change.

I've also heard from some people he’s giving thoughts to going pro.I really do expect that he’s going to come back to St. John’s. He's spent a lot of time in Queens. You can tell he’s still deeply embedded and invested in the program, and I don’t think he’s an NBA-ready player quite yet. With another year of college basketball, could he be? Absolutely. He has the skill set to be an NBA player down the road. He's not there right now, in my humble opinion.

The kid has to do what’s best for him, but there is a reason why his brother, Justin (formerly of Pitt) is going forward with the NBA and Julian is still testing the waters.I expect Julian will come back to St. John's and I do expect Mike Anderson’s team (to be good), despite a significant amount of roster overhaul. I think they had an addition by subtraction type of thing in which the transfers they brought could be better than what they had.”

https://setonhall.rivals.com/news/zooming-in-on-the-big-east
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Paultzman post=435582 said:
John Fanta on SJU & Julian

“That is the key. If he comes back, St. John’s is a top five team in the Big East, if not top three or four. If he does not come back, I can’t put them there, knowing how much instant offense he provided for that team. I still expect Julian Champagnie will come back to St. John's. I still am leaning toward that point of view. That’s what I've heard, but things could change.

I've also heard from some people he’s giving thoughts to going pro.I really do expect that he’s going to come back to St. John’s. He's spent a lot of time in Queens. You can tell he’s still deeply embedded and invested in the program, and I don’t think he’s an NBA-ready player quite yet. With another year of college basketball, could he be? Absolutely. He has the skill set to be an NBA player down the road. He's not there right now, in my humble opinion.

The kid has to do what’s best for him, but there is a reason why his brother, Justin (formerly of Pitt) is going forward with the NBA and Julian is still testing the waters.I expect Julian will come back to St. John's and I do expect Mike Anderson’s team (to be good), despite a significant amount of roster overhaul. I think they had an addition by subtraction type of thing in which the transfers they brought could be better than what they had.”

https://setonhall.rivals.com/news/zooming-in-on-the-big-east
I don't know how accurate this article is.   Julian is NOT an instant offense type of player - Vinnie Johnson was, Allen Iverson was, Isaiah Thomas was, Michael Jordan was, Bernard King was, Cazzie Russell was.   An instant offense player can torch an opponent  and is generally unstoppable once he gets it going.   Julian is a very fine, rock solid collegian, but instant offense is not his game.

Also, addition by subtraction means that simply by removing a player from the roster, the team is better because he is either a liability as a player or is a problem child.   Not a single kid who left fits that description, and does not deserve to be categorized as such.   The roster appears to be upgraded with better talent, simply addition by addition.
 
Respectfully disagree on your second point.  I mean I disrespect to the kids who left, but in several of those cases was definitely + by -   
 
redmanwest post=435591 said:
Respectfully disagree on your second point.  I mean I disrespect to the kids who left, but in several of those cases was definitely + by -   
Guessing who you mean, but he was also a pretty big producer and I don't think anyone would have been upset had he stayed.
 
Beast of the East post=435590 said:
Paultzman post=435582 said:
John Fanta on SJU & Julian

“That is the key. If he comes back, St. John’s is a top five team in the Big East, if not top three or four. If he does not come back, I can’t put them there, knowing how much instant offense he provided for that team. I still expect Julian Champagnie will come back to St. John's. I still am leaning toward that point of view. That’s what I've heard, but things could change.

I've also heard from some people he’s giving thoughts to going pro.I really do expect that he’s going to come back to St. John’s. He's spent a lot of time in Queens. You can tell he’s still deeply embedded and invested in the program, and I don’t think he’s an NBA-ready player quite yet. With another year of college basketball, could he be? Absolutely. He has the skill set to be an NBA player down the road. He's not there right now, in my humble opinion.

The kid has to do what’s best for him, but there is a reason why his brother, Justin (formerly of Pitt) is going forward with the NBA and Julian is still testing the waters.I expect Julian will come back to St. John's and I do expect Mike Anderson’s team (to be good), despite a significant amount of roster overhaul. I think they had an addition by subtraction type of thing in which the transfers they brought could be better than what they had.”

https://setonhall.rivals.com/news/zooming-in-on-the-big-east
I don't know how accurate this article is.   Julian is NOT an instant offense type of player - Vinnie Johnson was, Allen Iverson was, Isaiah Thomas was, Michael Jordan was, Bernard King was, Cazzie Russell was.   An instant offense player can torch an opponent  and is generally unstoppable once he gets it going.   Julian is a very fine, rock solid collegian, but instant offense is not his game.

Also, addition by subtraction means that simply by removing a player from the roster, the team is better because he is either a liability as a player or is a problem child.   Not a single kid who left fits that description, and does not deserve to be categorized as such.   The roster appears to be upgraded with better talent, simply addition by addition.


Is he not capable of scoring a bunch of points quickly? I think that’s what he meant by it. And I think that’s accurate. That game at providence is just one example.

Agree with you on the second point.
 
Last edited:
We lost a big moper and a big pain in the ass. Unfortunately, we also lost some great members of the team both in the locker room and the larger campus.
 
Couldn't have the additions without many of the subtractions due to scholarship numbers so it is indeed addition by subtraction if you believe the new guys are better.
 
Addition by subtraction means one or more left the team but you are better off without them even though you didn’t add anyone (see Boeheim’s comments regarding Jalen Johnson when he left Duke).  “We’re better off without them”.

In this case we replaced them so we “hopefully” got better players.
 
bamafan post=435609 said:
Couldn't have the additions without many of the subtractions due to scholarship numbers so it is indeed addition by subtraction if you believe the new guys are better.


We have 2 open spots not including Champ.
 
Last edited:
SJU85 post=435616 said:
Addition by subtraction means one or more left the team but you are better off without them even though you didn’t add anyone (see Boeheim’s comments regarding Jalen Johnson when he left Duke).  “We’re better off without them”.

In this case we replaced them so we “hopefully” got better players.
The expression taken in a vacuum yes but Fanta explained what he meant by it under these circumstances.
 
Amaseinyourface post=435618 said:
bamafan post=435609 said:
Couldn't have the additions without many of the subtractions due to scholarship numbers so it is indeed addition by subtraction if you believe the new guys are better.


We have 2 open spots not including Champ.
I did said many not all, 2 open schollies would not have been enough to add all the new players.
 
 
Back
Top