boo haarvey
Active member
Paultzman post=432780 said:Yes according to local hoops guy I spoke toBoo Harvey post=432776 said:Before everybody gets too excited, is Jamie Shaw a reputable source? Guy has close to 1,000 followers.
Awesome!
Paultzman post=432780 said:Yes according to local hoops guy I spoke toBoo Harvey post=432776 said:Before everybody gets too excited, is Jamie Shaw a reputable source? Guy has close to 1,000 followers.
Awesome!
AlexSTJ post=432782 said:Can you name a higher rated, more regarded recruit than Alvarado that SJU has a legit shot with? You really think it's a stretch to say this the most important get for CMA so far during his tenure? Unless of course you saw foresaw the tremendous success of Posh and Julian as a frosh and sophomore. Of course it's more important to recruit multi year players, no one ever argued that. SJU needs to close on guys like Alvarado before thinking about landing top HS recruits.Moose post=432766 said:AlexSTJ post=432764 said:No. I know they are prepared. Not sure where in my post I questioned that. I was simply reinforcing a point. But forget Riley, Cuffe, Curbelo, Richmond, etc. Alvarado will be the biggest possible SJU recruit during CMA's current tenure if he enters the portal. Similar to Whitehead and Brisco during the Lavin days.Paultzman post=432761 said:You honestly feel that staff was not aware of the rumor out there for weeks and is not prepared for best shot? I am sure they are. Let’s get confirmation Jose is entering portal and go from there.AlexSTJ post=432759 said:Hate to jump the gun. But if it's Alvarado, CMA and staff have to close on this. System fits a guy like him perfectly. Plenty of opportunities to grab steals and run an up-tempo offense. My mouth is watering at the thought of having our backcourt comprised of the reigning Big East AND ACC DPOYs. There's no reason for SJU to let this one slip.
If we truly want to ascend to the next level, this needs to happen. This is not an exaggeration. It's really that simple.
A 5th year Senior is the most important player of CMA's tenure?
I like Alvarado and want him here but I can't go that far. If he comes the team better win next year because they will be losing A TON next year with the real seniors and super seniors.
I happen to think multi year core players are more important recruits personally.
Just wondering, say he's only interested in one school now (presumably us), why wasn't that the case in 2017? I seem to remember many seeing him as a Rutgers lean before he went to GT. Was it just a case of lack of interest from the previous staff? I know we had a very guard heavy roster back then but obviously in hindsight it would have been very nice to have had him from the beginning.Paultzman post=432774
Been clearfordham96 post=432772 said:If Alvarado gets out of the draft and goes in the portal trust me there is one school he is really interested in.
Double J post=432790 said:Just wondering, say he's only interested in one school now (presumably us), why wasn't that the case in 2017? I seem to remember many seeing him as a Rutgers lean before he went to GT. Was it just a case of lack of interest from the previous staff? I know we had a very guard heavy roster back then but obviously in hindsight it would have been very nice to have had him from the beginning.Paultzman post=432774
Been clearfordham96 post=432772 said:If Alvarado gets out of the draft and goes in the portal trust me there is one school he is really interested in.
Yep, he's certainly a reputable guy. A couple of basketball coaches I've known for years knows Jamie Shaw and can vouch for that as well.Paultzman post=432780 said:Yes according to local hoops guy I spoke to. Sense this situation will be clearer soon re entering portal.Boo Harvey post=432776 said:Before everybody gets too excited, is Jamie Shaw a reputable source? Guy has close to 1,000 followers.
JohnnyFan post=432792 said:Double J post=432790 said:Just wondering, say he's only interested in one school now (presumably us), why wasn't that the case in 2017? I seem to remember many seeing him as a Rutgers lean before he went to GT. Was it just a case of lack of interest from the previous staff? I know we had a very guard heavy roster back then but obviously in hindsight it would have been very nice to have had him from the beginning.Paultzman post=432774
Been clearfordham96 post=432772 said:If Alvarado gets out of the draft and goes in the portal trust me there is one school he is really interested in.
The scenario I recall is that Mullin and staff backed off Alvarado some time before the end of his recruitment. His final schools included Rutgers, Seton Hall, GT and VCU (I think). Rutgers was thought to be the favorite, but he surprisingly sprung for GT.
Amaseinyourface post=432798 said:Just for fun
17 ACC games last year
14.4 pts
3.6 rebs
4.2 ast
3.1 stls
2:1 A:TO ratio
53% fg
61% 2fg
40% 3fg
87% ft
JohnnyFan post=432799 said:Amaseinyourface post=432798 said:Just for fun
17 ACC games last year
14.4 pts
3.6 rebs
4.2 ast
3.1 stls
2:1 A:TO ratio
53% fg
61% 2fg
40% 3fg
87% ft
Definitely the real deal.
Amaseinyourface post=432800 said:JohnnyFan post=432799 said:Amaseinyourface post=432798 said:Just for fun
17 ACC games last year
14.4 pts
3.6 rebs
4.2 ast
3.1 stls
2:1 A:TO ratio
53% fg
61% 2fg
40% 3fg
87% ft
Definitely the real deal.
He brings everything that Dunn brought to the table, and without slighting him, much more efficiently. Those %s for a point guard asked to do all of that are unreal.
I don’t want to get too excited about it, but it would be incredible. He was also a second team All ACC player and their defensive POY last year. If by some miracle we landed him, we’d have the returning Big East and ACC defensive POY’s here. And Alvarado can’t be compared to Dunn. Alvarado is an excellent shooter at all levels. We basically ran two PG’s here last year so I don’t think it should be any deterrent but never know. Like I said though, don’t wanna get too excited about this one just yet.
Amaseinyourface post=432800 said:JohnnyFan post=432799 said:Amaseinyourface post=432798 said:Just for fun
17 ACC games last year
14.4 pts
3.6 rebs
4.2 ast
3.1 stls
2:1 A:TO ratio
53% fg
61% 2fg
40% 3fg
87% ft
Unreal numbers, efficiency extraordinaire, 3.1 steals PG better than Posh and probably top 5 nationally!
Definitely the real deal.
He brings everything that Dunn brought to the table, and without slighting him, much more efficiently. Those %s for a point guard asked to do all of that are unreal.
The world we live in for sure, well stated & agree on all pointslawmanfan post=432808 said:I generally agree with Moose that - at least historically - the key to program-building has been to develop a pipeline of rotation players who you can develop over 2, 3, 4 years so that there is always someone in the program who can step up when the upperclassmen leave. In that world, transfers and JUCOs are fine as plug-ins when needed, and can make a real difference in a team that already has most of its players in-house.
And I've been somewhat vocal on this board that people should put less value on a recruit's star rankings because a good staff with an eye for talent and the ability to develop that talent can get you pretty far regardless of the "stars" - they can come along later.
BUT - having said that, I just don't know if we live in that world anymore. The new normal may be a lot more roster turnover than we've been used to (well that college basketball in general has been used to), and it's going to affect the way you build your team. It's going to be harder and harder to hold onto the talent you're trying to develop, and easier and easier to acquire talent that someone else was developing.
In addition, from a SJU standpoint it is really important to keep forward progress going and to take a big step forward if possible. That would immensely boost the chances of the program thriving in what's likely to be a "rich get richer and poor get poorer world." In that landscape, you need to position yourself as one of the rich to attract players.
I don't get bogged down in "most important recruit ever" or whatnot, but WRT Alvarado there's no question that he's a guy who would be a real difference-maker and would put SJU in the conversation for top-3 in the league. And if you have an opportunity to do that, you do it. It's true it would give us 4 or 5 likely departures next year, but if all goes well the 3 freshmen this year will be ready to fill some of that gap, there will be more freshmen behind them - and the transfer portal will still be there and maybe even more fruitful if it involves coming to a good and rising program, which Alvarado would most certainly help us be.