SJU Fan Tradition Continues-Blame The Coach

It also seems to me that the big plan is to send guys to the NBA so that you can recruit more NBA-caliber players so that ultimately your guys will be better than the other team's guys almost every game.

There is nothing wrong with that particular plan. Many coaches use that plan, whether they admit it or not. Many kids nowadays pay more attention to the NBA, than they do college basketball. So, why not use the lure of NBA to get them to come to your respective school? Calipari has played that card so well (most of his players are NBA talents, regardless where they attend school) that it's now an illusion.

That way you can win on talent without actually having to worry about coaching or strategy too much
.

Is that your belief or is that what you believe the staff is actually doing? Just curiously asking....

Nobody has a problem with a plan to recruit the maximum amount of talent (though it could be argued that planning around sending a guy to the NBA can come at the expense of building a program). But it would be nice to see implementation, development and execution of a consistent basketball structure while we're racking up wins based on talent.

He's just starting his 3rd (physical) season, as the coach. How can you say any of this with absoluteness?

There's no sense painting the house until you've laid the foundation.

There's also no sense in painting (the house) with too broad of a brush, either. ;)
 
It also seems to me that the big plan is to send guys to the NBA so that you can recruit more NBA-caliber players so that ultimately your guys will be better than the other team's guys almost every game.

There is nothing wrong with that particular plan. Many coaches use that plan, whether they admit it or not. Many kids nowadays pay more attention to the NBA, than they do college basketball. So, why not use the lure of NBA to get them to come to your respective school? Calipari has played that card so well (most of his players are NBA talents, regardless where they attend school) that it's now an illusion.

That way you can win on talent without actually having to worry about coaching or strategy too much
.

Is that your belief or is that what you believe the staff is actually doing? Just curiously asking....

Nobody has a problem with a plan to recruit the maximum amount of talent (though it could be argued that planning around sending a guy to the NBA can come at the expense of building a program). But it would be nice to see implementation, development and execution of a consistent basketball structure while we're racking up wins based on talent.

He's just starting his 3rd (physical) season, as the coach. How can you say any of this with absoluteness?

There's no sense painting the house until you've laid the foundation.

There's also no sense in painting (the house) with too broad of a brush, either. ;)

Blah. Hoop Dreams were released in 1994. I think one of the premises was that 100% of inner city kids playing college basketball had high hopes of playing in the NBA whether D1, D2, or D3 athletes. Kids always have wanted to play in the NBA as a goal, and if you have to hang around 4 years today your NBA star isn't that high. Becoming a one-and-done program helps recruiting immensely. Look, it is nice to recruit to a system, but how many programs do that? Kentucky just stockpiles top 15 talent, and reloads continually. We aren't a Kentucky, North Carolina, or Duke, so why even compare their success to ours?
 
It also seems to me that the big plan is to send guys to the NBA so that you can recruit more NBA-caliber players so that ultimately your guys will be better than the other team's guys almost every game.

There is nothing wrong with that particular plan. Many coaches use that plan, whether they admit it or not. Many kids nowadays pay more attention to the NBA, than they do college basketball. So, why not use the lure of NBA to get them to come to your respective school? Calipari has played that card so well (most of his players are NBA talents, regardless where they attend school) that it's now an illusion.

That way you can win on talent without actually having to worry about coaching or strategy too much
.

Is that your belief or is that what you believe the staff is actually doing? Just curiously asking....

Nobody has a problem with a plan to recruit the maximum amount of talent (though it could be argued that planning around sending a guy to the NBA can come at the expense of building a program). But it would be nice to see implementation, development and execution of a consistent basketball structure while we're racking up wins based on talent.

He's just starting his 3rd (physical) season, as the coach. How can you say any of this with absoluteness?

There's no sense painting the house until you've laid the foundation.

There's also no sense in painting (the house) with too broad of a brush, either. ;)

Blah. Hoop Dreams were released in 1994. I think one of the premises was that 100% of inner city kids playing college basketball had high hopes of playing in the NBA whether D1, D2, or D3 athletes. Kids always have wanted to play in the NBA as a goal, and if you have to hang around 4 years today your NBA star isn't that high. Becoming a one-and-done program helps recruiting immensely. Look, it is nice to recruit to a system, but how many programs do that? Kentucky just stockpiles top 15 talent, and reloads continually. We aren't a Kentucky, North Carolina, or Duke, so why even compare their success to ours?

Kentucky is the only truly one and done franchise. UNC and Duke rarely have a one and done. Same with Kansas. this year is unique in that there are simply so many talented NBA level freshmen because of the NBA age rule. Remove that age restriction and the playing field is pretty level.
BTW, Calipari did exactly what he is doing at Memphis and made them perrenial top 5.
SJU, however, has not been recruiting any one and dones and is not involved with hardly a top 50 player through 2015 so unless Lav is hanging his hat on Maurice Harkless, he has little to promise thus far. This year the only three NBA prospects on the team need to develop at light speed pace to get drafted in the first round. That would mean wins and I am all for that. My concern is if that happens where are our future pros coming from in the next two years?
One and done? I wish!
 
It also seems to me that the big plan is to send guys to the NBA so that you can recruit more NBA-caliber players so that ultimately your guys will be better than the other team's guys almost every game.

There is nothing wrong with that particular plan. Many coaches use that plan, whether they admit it or not. Many kids nowadays pay more attention to the NBA, than they do college basketball. So, why not use the lure of NBA to get them to come to your respective school? Calipari has played that card so well (most of his players are NBA talents, regardless where they attend school) that it's now an illusion.

That way you can win on talent without actually having to worry about coaching or strategy too much
.

Is that your belief or is that what you believe the staff is actually doing? Just curiously asking....

Nobody has a problem with a plan to recruit the maximum amount of talent (though it could be argued that planning around sending a guy to the NBA can come at the expense of building a program). But it would be nice to see implementation, development and execution of a consistent basketball structure while we're racking up wins based on talent.

He's just starting his 3rd (physical) season, as the coach. How can you say any of this with absoluteness?

There's no sense painting the house until you've laid the foundation.

There's also no sense in painting (the house) with too broad of a brush, either. ;)

Blah. Hoop Dreams were released in 1994. I think one of the premises was that 100% of inner city kids playing college basketball had high hopes of playing in the NBA whether D1, D2, or D3 athletes. Kids always have wanted to play in the NBA as a goal, and if you have to hang around 4 years today your NBA star isn't that high. Becoming a one-and-done program helps recruiting immensely. Look, it is nice to recruit to a system, but how many programs do that? Kentucky just stockpiles top 15 talent, and reloads continually. We aren't a Kentucky, North Carolina, or Duke, so why even compare their success to ours?

Kentucky is the only truly one and done franchise. UNC and Duke rarely have a one and done. Same with Kansas. this year is unique in that there are simply so many talented NBA level freshmen because of the NBA age rule. Remove that age restriction and the playing field is pretty level.
BTW, Calipari did exactly what he is doing at Memphis and made them perrenial top 5.

Cal relied heavilly on uppperclassmen while at Memphis. He has also always had a few upperclassmen on his other great teams. People fail to realize this. You cannot win the big on with just freshmen.
 
Say if for some reason with all this talent we are just an avg team (htf can we just be avg right, but this is just an example.), and we don`t get the the ncaa tourny. There`s no way top ballers would come here to play. If Sampson and Jordan then we`ll be fine next year, but if they both go and we get good recruit but not the type to help right away. If that happened how good would we be the next two years? This year and the next two would be six total and five with his recruit but no ncaa tourny.

That`s around where Norm was. Would we not want Lavin fired if he has the same results as Norm just because he recruits better then Norm, but again the same results. I don`t know but I`d think we`d have to do something.
That`s why I think this season right here is so damn huge that we have to dominate this year.
I know we only played one game and no shame to losing to a ranked team. I just can`t stop thinking about being down 18 in the first 15minutes and being pumped about the game since first finding out about it. That`s what really bothers me still about that game.
Well we should win the next four games. If we could win that Tournament at the Barclays, I`d think Penn St, Ga Tech, and Ole Miss are very beatable or am I wrong on that? Then we should be able to beat Fordham (notice I said should since I don`t take anything thing for granted with this team.
If we want to show we`re big time and we`re ready for the big time then we have to win every game going into the Syracuse, and no morebs excuses. Just win your games.

I had a hard time reading that but did you just fast forward three seasons with us missing the tourny in all 3 of them? It doesn't work like that.

Obviously if they kick ass this season then it`s a mute point, but if they for some reason don`t make the ncaa tourny, and we lose a few of our top players, and replace them with some good ballers that will take a year or two to really matter in games. How are they gonna be any better then this year?

As Dinkins said oh the Wisconsin game was the first game of the year. Okay lets see, Was Sanchez able to practice last year with the team? I`m not sure which is why I`m asking. GG started a few games two years ago. The practice and played together in the summer.
People like to make excuses.
So ok Dinkins as you said let the season play on. Just hope they`re no worse then 9-3 by B.E. play.
Is that reasonable enough or am I going over what`s realistic?
 
no one is posting that lavin should be fired.

it's frustrating, however, that we're sweating out wagner and bucknell in year four.

honestly, did anyone think that would be the case when lavin was hired?

Nope, third year with his recruits I expected SJU to be right around Arizona is. Wasn`t Sendek hired the same year as Lavin or maybe a year before him? Well it`s year three, time to get some results.
 
Say if for some reason with all this talent we are just an avg team (htf can we just be avg right, but this is just an example.), and we don`t get the the ncaa tourny. There`s no way top ballers would come here to play. If Sampson and Jordan then we`ll be fine next year, but if they both go and we get good recruit but not the type to help right away. If that happened how good would we be the next two years? This year and the next two would be six total and five with his recruit but no ncaa tourny.

That`s around where Norm was. Would we not want Lavin fired if he has the same results as Norm just because he recruits better then Norm, but again the same results. I don`t know but I`d think we`d have to do something.
That`s why I think this season right here is so damn huge that we have to dominate this year.
I know we only played one game and no shame to losing to a ranked team. I just can`t stop thinking about being down 18 in the first 15minutes and being pumped about the game since first finding out about it. That`s what really bothers me still about that game.
Well we should win the next four games. If we could win that Tournament at the Barclays, I`d think Penn St, Ga Tech, and Ole Miss are very beatable or am I wrong on that? Then we should be able to beat Fordham (notice I said should since I don`t take anything thing for granted with this team.
If we want to show we`re big time and we`re ready for the big time then we have to win every game going into the Syracuse, and no morebs excuses. Just win your games.

I had a hard time reading that but did you just fast forward three seasons with us missing the tourny in all 3 of them? It doesn't work like that.

Obviously if they kick ass this season then it`s a mute point, but if they for some reason don`t make the ncaa tourny, and we lose a few of our top players, and replace them with some good ballers that will take a year or two to really matter in games. How are they gonna be any better then this year?

As Dinkins said oh the Wisconsin game was the first game of the year. Okay lets see, Was Sanchez able to practice last year with the team? I`m not sure which is why I`m asking. GG started a few games two years ago. The practice and played together in the summer.
People like to make excuses.
So ok Dinkins as you said let the season play on. Just hope they`re no worse then 9-3 by B.E. play.
Is that reasonable enough or am I going over what`s realistic?

Sometime your best recruits are your returning players. You can't skip ahead 3 years because you never know how kids will develop and which kid may transfer in/out.
 
no one is posting that lavin should be fired.

it's frustrating, however, that we're sweating out wagner and bucknell in year four.

honestly, did anyone think that would be the case when lavin was hired?

Nope, third year with his recruits I expected SJU to be right around Arizona is. Wasn`t Sendek hired the same year as Lavin or maybe a year before him? Well it`s year three, time to get some results.

Sendek is at Arizona State. This is his 8th year at Arizona State. He's only been to one NCAA Tournament since he's been in Tempe. Not to mention, Lavin beat him in the Great Alaska Shootout Championship game. But, you might've been referring to Miller at Arizona.

It's actually Lavin's 2nd year with his recruits, as he was out most of their freshman season.
 
Say if for some reason with all this talent we are just an avg team (htf can we just be avg right, but this is just an example.), and we don`t get the the ncaa tourny. There`s no way top ballers would come here to play. If Sampson and Jordan then we`ll be fine next year, but if they both go and we get good recruit but not the type to help right away. If that happened how good would we be the next two years? This year and the next two would be six total and five with his recruit but no ncaa tourny.

That`s around where Norm was. Would we not want Lavin fired if he has the same results as Norm just because he recruits better then Norm, but again the same results. I don`t know but I`d think we`d have to do something.
That`s why I think this season right here is so damn huge that we have to dominate this year.
I know we only played one game and no shame to losing to a ranked team. I just can`t stop thinking about being down 18 in the first 15minutes and being pumped about the game since first finding out about it. That`s what really bothers me still about that game.
Well we should win the next four games. If we could win that Tournament at the Barclays, I`d think Penn St, Ga Tech, and Ole Miss are very beatable or am I wrong on that? Then we should be able to beat Fordham (notice I said should since I don`t take anything thing for granted with this team.
If we want to show we`re big time and we`re ready for the big time then we have to win every game going into the Syracuse, and no morebs excuses. Just win your games.

I had a hard time reading that but did you just fast forward three seasons with us missing the tourny in all 3 of them? It doesn't work like that.

Obviously if they kick ass this season then it`s a mute point, but if they for some reason don`t make the ncaa tourny, and we lose a few of our top players, and replace them with some good ballers that will take a year or two to really matter in games. How are they gonna be any better then this year?

As Dinkins said oh the Wisconsin game was the first game of the year. Okay lets see, Was Sanchez able to practice last year with the team? I`m not sure which is why I`m asking. GG started a few games two years ago. The practice and played together in the summer.
People like to make excuses.
So ok Dinkins as you said let the season play on. Just hope they`re no worse then 9-3 by B.E. play.
Is that reasonable enough or am I going over what`s realistic?

Many other teams also practiced and played together in the summer. I bet you wasn't aware Wisconsin played summer games, as well. Be honest.

People like to make excuses, as to you like to overreact when the season is only 2 games old. It goes both ways.

What's realistic to you may not be realistic to me and vice-versa. My point is to allow the season to play out before being all up in arms.
 
Here's another couple of random thoughts on the subject of our coaching history.
I have always remained a fan of coach Roberts as a man and a coach. He accomplished exactly what he was charged to do at SJU.
In his final year, when the ante was raised his kids were not yet ready. They did deliver the goal in their final year both on the court, and in giving STJ a world and NCAA record of 10 out of ten college graduates in a basketball program. Further, at least 2 of his total 4 assistants now are head coaches at D-1 programs and Coach, himself, is assisting and competing for a national championship every year at Kansas. I wish him well.
I don't think Jarvis, Fraschilla, or Brian have developed any staff into head coaches and no one had the graduation rate with their own players.
The discussion about Coach Lavin's performance should really include the assistants. There are a large number of suits on our bench with records of success beyond all imagination. They are a part of the team and part of the development. If you feel we are not getting the production you expect, the criticism should be aimed at the basketball staff, not the coach, exclusively. I well know the adages "the buck stops here" and "if you can't stand the heat............." but this too is a team effort. There are probably 2000 wins in that staff . I see nothing wrong with Coach Lavin's leadership, inspirational presence, recruiting and sales ability, press and community relations, and, interaction with alumni, university staff, administration, and parents. Along with Looie, he's the best we ever had.
If the team disappoints you, my suggestion is to look to the staff bench. If they can't build a team from this talent, then it's got to be a learning problem with the kids themselves.
 
Here's another couple of random thoughts on the subject of our coaching history.
I have always remained a fan of coach Roberts as a man and a coach. He accomplished exactly what he was charged to do at SJU.
In his final year, when the ante was raised his kids were not yet ready. They did deliver the goal in their final year both on the court, and in giving STJ a world and NCAA record of 10 out of ten college graduates in a basketball program. Further, at least 2 of his total 4 assistants now are head coaches at D-1 programs and Coach, himself, is assisting and competing for a national championship every year at Kansas. I wish him well.
I don't think Jarvis, Fraschilla, or Brian have developed any staff into head coaches and no one had the graduation rate with their own players.

You lost me with this opening paragraph. NR was hired to rebuild a SJU program that was one year removed from an NIT championship the season he was hired. He was hired to WIN, and given the nod with a losing head coach resume, primarily because he recruited for Bill Self and came across as a good guy in interviews. Jarvis and Fraschilla, who both won here, were considered anything but good guys upon their firings, and FH was sick of having guys like this represent the University. (Funny how the BOTs concluded that Harrington and Wile could no longer represent the University based on their own dealings, but that's another story)

Any notion that NR developed two assistants into head coaches is pure hogwash. Glenn Braica was a 15 year assistant at St. Francis before stepping up to a Big East assistant's position. He met NR at Queens College, where they both played, and a long friendship followed. Upon NR's firing, the head coaching position at St. Francis opened, and Braica got the job, much based on his 15 year association with the program. He is 43-48 there.

Chris Casey is the head coach at Niagara, was hired last April, one month after Father Maher, who sat on the SJU bench for years, took over as the school's President. After leaving St. John's, Casey went on to a head coaching job at CW Post, and went 62-25 there in 3 seasons. DII head coaching jobs generally pay a lot less than an assistant slot at a big time program. In Post's league, a lot of head coaches had full time day jobs elsewhere. Like Cluess before him, he was hired by Niagara on the strength of his success at Post, and the Niagara-SJU-Vincentian-Fr. Maher connection cannot be discounted here.

You are free to like NR as a person. I've met people who know him very well and say he is a swell guy. But to distort his accomplishments at SJU as anything but a failure to win are just sidebars. Graduating players is admirable, but there are guys like Bob Knight who graduated nearly every player who ever played for him, and still managed to win a little.

It's a little ironic that we are in aggregate concluding that Lavin isn't a great coach, but Lavin and co. made a lot of changes to the roles of players he inherited from NR, and the improvement was radical.

I have no problem with the rest of your post, but as far as NR accolades, spare me - I like too many of us, was there for the whole losing era.
 
as far as lawman's quote: "Let's see what actually happens, measured by more than just Ws and Ls."...W's and L's are what it's about. no one complained that norm's players weren't good citizens.

Newsie, you know exactly what I meant. Yes, he needs to produce wins. The question is, if their players better than ours, how much confidence do you have in our staff to gameplan or manage the game to create a win? Conversely, even in games where our players are better than theirs, how much confidence do you have in our staff to win the game?

Seems to me that the consensus answer to both questions by a majority of the posters is "not much." I'm in that camp, and I'm pretty sure you are too.

It also seems to me that the big plan is to send guys to the NBA so that you can recruit more NBA-caliber players so that ultimately your guys will be better than the other team's guys almost every game. That way you can win on talent without actually having to worry about coaching or strategy too much.

Nobody has a problem with a plan to recruit the maximum amount of talent (though it could be argued that planning around sending a guy to the NBA can come at the expense of building a program). But it would be nice to see implementation, development and execution of a consistent basketball structure while we're racking up wins based on talent.

There's no sense painting the house until you've laid the foundation.

Enjoyed all the posts in this thread Many valid opinions and assumptions and facts
 
The record shows that when Coach Roberts was hired, we had a an NCAA record of 15 wins and 60 losses in the preceding 4 years (yeah, I now about the asterisk) and we had an ax hanging over our head that ultimately resulted in a tourney ban along with the loss of 40+ victories. The preceding year we had a record of 1-15 in Big East competition and and a pre-rollback record of 6-21 before we vacated 4 of those wins. Recruits were tempted to join a returning base of Devon Mayo, walk on Phil Messire, Nygel Roach, Melvin Tyler Jones,......you get the point. We were not exactly on a roll.
Far more profound in the list of needs that added to SJU's sense of urgency was the almost total loss of our 100 year stellar history of running a squeaky clean program to go along with a four star reputation for sportsmanship and fair play. Tens of thousands of graduates let their heads bow in shame as we perceived the value of our degrees tarnish with each revelation in the daily papers.
Job one, job two and job three for coach Roberts was to help restore our reputation; if he won, fine. If he didn't, that was fine as well as long as we had college students representing our Catholic/ Vincention University and that they conducted themselves with dignity and honor. I would proudly point out to you that he did that with great results and with a rare dignity.
I would also hasten to point out that Coach Robert's record in his last two years was 33-34 with a BE in season record of 12-24.
You may think that that is inadequate and it may be. I would also point out that our current team's last two years have produced a "less adequate " 30-35 but a small improvement in conference 14-22. I like this coach as well as Roberts and his recruits measure up to the high standards which have been set for them.
Facts don't lie, but, having said and proven that, let's stop looking back and, complaining. Save for one bad apple, we are in a better place today because of Coach Roberts and the others and we should leave it at that.
To remind myself of what that one guy can do to destroy a 100 year fine reputation, I keep a photo above my desk of the '03-'04 team, the bravest and most representative of the average SJU student, all 9 players including 3 walk ons and 6 from the preceeding years non playing bench.
 
The record shows Norm Roberts had one of if not the worst record in Big East history.

You are what your record says you are
 
I guess I'm in the Oldfan camp. I was happy about the Roberts hire. I wish he had won more but, considering what he walked into, I appreciate and respect what he did to right the ship. Reputation is a valuable commodity, and he restored ours. I was happy that he was given a fair opportunity to try to turn things atound on the court. He couldn't, was let go, and replaced with someone with a track record of winning. Now, let's give Lavin a fair opportunity to get us back to where we want to be.
 
Here's another couple of random thoughts on the subject of our coaching history.
I have always remained a fan of coach Roberts as a man and a coach. He accomplished exactly what he was charged to do at SJU.
In his final year, when the ante was raised his kids were not yet ready. They did deliver the goal in their final year both on the court, and in giving STJ a world and NCAA record of 10 out of ten college graduates in a basketball program. Further, at least 2 of his total 4 assistants now are head coaches at D-1 programs and Coach, himself, is assisting and competing for a national championship every year at Kansas. I wish him well.
I don't think Jarvis, Fraschilla, or Brian have developed any staff into head coaches and no one had the graduation rate with their own players.
The discussion about Coach Lavin's performance should really include the assistants. There are a large number of suits on our bench with records of success beyond all imagination. They are a part of the team and part of the development. If you feel we are not getting the production you expect, the criticism should be aimed at the basketball staff, not the coach, exclusively. I well know the adages "the buck stops here" and "if you can't stand the heat............." but this too is a team effort. There are probably 2000 wins in that staff . I see nothing wrong with Coach Lavin's leadership, inspirational presence, recruiting and sales ability, press and community relations, and, interaction with alumni, university staff, administration, and parents. Along with Looie, he's the best we ever had.
If the team disappoints you, my suggestion is to look to the staff bench. If they can't build a team from this talent, then it's got to be a learning problem with the kids themselves.

Norm did a good job, and if this year's team struggles then we should blame the assistants. Got it.

Absolutely ridiculous.
 
I don't get this whole "Norm restored our reputation" thing. Why? Because there wasn't another sex scandal? How often does something like that happen, regardless of who is coach?

He certainly didn't restore our reputation with regard to win-loss record and recruiting.
 
I don't get this whole "Norm restored our reputation" thing. Why? Because there wasn't another sex scandal? How often does something like that happen, regardless of who is coach?

He certainly didn't restore our reputation with regard to win-loss record and recruiting.

So we are reliving the Norm years? I think we all have a short memory-or maybe I have a bad one. From what I recall, there was talk of dumping the whole program if another incident happened. The program's reputation was so tarnished that finding the right coach may have been difficult. Who did you want us to hire? Calipari? No chance we were heading there at that time. No coach would want the limitations Norm accepted, which was do it squeaky clean. No gray areas. No Grady Reynolds types. No chances of any kind. I believed then that Norm was the stopgap hire. Keep things clean, restore order, and given a thank you for your service. Father Harrington was shell shocked by the Jarvis years and the scandal that soon followed. Norm did as he was told. That's what the school was looking for, and received. If it was about wins only, he would not have be given the job.
 
The record shows that when Coach Roberts was hired, we had a an NCAA record of 15 wins and 60 losses in the preceding 4 years (yeah, I now about the asterisk) and we had an ax hanging over our head that ultimately resulted in a tourney ban along with the loss of 40+ victories. The preceding year we had a record of 1-15 in Big East competition and and a pre-rollback record of 6-21 before we vacated 4 of those wins. Recruits were tempted to join a returning base of Devon Mayo, walk on Phil Messire, Nygel Roach, Melvin Tyler Jones,......you get the point. We were not exactly on a roll.
Far more profound in the list of needs that added to SJU's sense of urgency was the almost total loss of our 100 year stellar history of running a squeaky clean program to go along with a four star reputation for sportsmanship and fair play. Tens of thousands of graduates let their heads bow in shame as we perceived the value of our degrees tarnish with each revelation in the daily papers.
Job one, job two and job three for coach Roberts was to help restore our reputation; if he won, fine. If he didn't, that was fine as well as long as we had college students representing our Catholic/ Vincention University and that they conducted themselves with dignity and honor. I would proudly point out to you that he did that with great results and with a rare dignity.
I would also hasten to point out that Coach Robert's record in his last two years was 33-34 with a BE in season record of 12-24.
You may think that that is inadequate and it may be. I would also point out that our current team's last two years have produced a "less adequate " 30-35 but a small improvement in conference 14-22. I like this coach as well as Roberts and his recruits measure up to the high standards which have been set for them.
Facts don't lie, but, having said and proven that, let's stop looking back and, complaining. Save for one bad apple, we are in a better place today because of Coach Roberts and the others and we should leave it at that.
To remind myself of what that one guy can do to destroy a 100 year fine reputation, I keep a photo above my desk of the '03-'04 team, the bravest and most representative of the average SJU student, all 9 players including 3 walk ons and 6 from the preceeding years non playing bench.

Roberts was horrible - period. He was so desperate in his final two seasons, and cast caution to the wind, leaving Lavin with a senior laden team with no succession - so that in Lavin year 2, the roster had turned over completely with an inordinate recruiting task. In conference records mean a whole lot more than overall record, and Roberts took to proclaiming a narrow victory against a low D1 team as totally satisfying, even as we sunk to the bottom of the Big East.

Make no doubt about this fact that won't lie - Norm Roberts will never again be hired as a head coach to clean up a major program with good students and a horrible record. But if and when Lavin departs here, he will get another job as a head coach.

To be clear, Jarvis did not destroy SJU's 100 year reputation - he left with his own reputation a lot more tarnished than a program that always played things above board until things crumbled under Jarvis. St.John's recovered, Jarvis himself still bear the stench of what happened here, and will for a long time.

Respecting your post, but any of us could have cleaned up the program the way Roberts did - by recruiting low end Big East talent, and having almost zero coaching talent, and losing everywhere he coached in his career - from Molloy freshmen, to Queens College varsity, to St. John's. He can claim his finest coaching accomplishment as what Lavin did with "Robert's guys". If you remember, Roberts was under the delusion that he would have had the same success, and publicly inferred as much. Goodbye, good riddance, and hopefully the program never makes a NR mistake again.
 
Back
Top