The Kentucky Kids do TV commercials for the Stud farms"What do you know about the ponies Mackensie? Nothing? Me either! I'm a kid from Queens. So all you gotta do is take a few pics with these colts and your Venmo account will never be the same."
The Kentucky Kids do TV commercials for the Stud farms"What do you know about the ponies Mackensie? Nothing? Me either! I'm a kid from Queens. So all you gotta do is take a few pics with these colts and your Venmo account will never be the same."
you are a sick manThe Kentucky Kids do TV commercials for the Stud farms
Won't matter much because if the staff pulls off the Mgbako Miracle I feel like the staff could reel in a big name guard for a visit.Thomasson obviously shopping for best NIL deal. My “lock” not one I hear. Mea Culpa mkras
NIL isn't even remotely related to signing an NBA contract which contractually binds a player to a team for a specific period of time. NBA players who are in the superstar class sign marketing contracts totally unrelated to their team contracts for their "name, image and likeness" that are used to market products or services. Their names and images are established in the marketplace and are no different than celebrity endorsements.What's the difference between what these players(I'm not using the word "kids" any more) are doing and what NBA players do? It's almost always about the money. Doesn't mean someone isn't a quality person who won't be a good addition to a team.
Don't hate the players, I hate the game.
Fair enough, and some of the decisions these kids make will no doubt be very short sighted, but when all is said and done, does that automatically mean that Noah(for instance) is going to be a bad teammate? Not sure that taking advantage of the system makes you a bad person. And rest assured, Rick is still going to have to deal with at least some kids who are only coming here because we're offering the most $.NIL isn't even remotely related to signing an NBA contract which contractually binds a player to a team for a specific period of time. NBA players who are in the superstar class sign marketing contracts totally unrelated to their team contracts for their "name, image and likeness" that are used to market products or services. Their names and images are established in the marketplace and are no different than celebrity endorsements.
High school basketball players and the vast majority of college portal transfer applicants have ZERO established marketability. Let me repeat that ZERO MARKETABILITY.
If I posted the pictures of 50 of the 1500 players in the portal, I would bet your social security check that not one player would be recognized unless you followed the player at his specific school.
So, how is the "marketing value" of a Noah Thomasson established for competitive bidding? While Niagara fans may be familiar with his name and image, is the average resident of Pittsburgh, U.S.A. even vaguely aware or cares who he is??
If Mike Maher's nephew had a choice of playing for a loser coach at Pitt for $30,000 NIL or $20,000 at St. John's and be coached by a coaching legend, Mike would tell him to "go for the money". If, theoretically, a player chooses to sign with a school and coach where he can best learn his trade, why is MONEY , and miniscule $ for the most part, a deciding factor? One can understand the difference if the player were previously nationally established and NBA lottery material. But Noah Thomasson??
Hence, that's where a coach like Rick Pitino knows when to separate the wheat from the chaff. While the player is a legend in the making "in his own mind", Rick Pitino has to weigh his offer versus other future player's value to "his team".
An example would be Gardner. A 4* decom from a Rick Pitino team in the Big East who may get a few thousand bucks more playing in Phoenix in a one bid conference.
Mommy may have told her man-child to go for the money but that greedy shortsighted advice is only advisable for true future stars and the 1% that really have any hope to ever wear an NBA uniform.
I think I mentioned something like this previously.... Players like Nick Timberlake and the likes know they aren't gonna play in the NBA, so they're trying to leverage for for big NIL payday$. Players of his ilk can be rather valuable for a collegiate team, but they're more than likely headed abroad to play professionally. Some coaches, presuming Pitino is one, doesn't and will not give those particular players what they want (ie, separating the wheat from the chaff).Hence, that's where a coach like Rick Pitino knows when to separate the wheat from the chaff. While the player is a legend in the making "in his own mind", Rick Pitino has to weigh his offer versus other future player's value to "his team".
An example would be Gardner. A 4* decom from a Rick Pitino team in the Big East who may get a few thousand bucks more playing in Phoenix in a one bid conference.
Mommy may have told her man-child to go for the money but that greedy shortsighted advice is only advisable for true future stars and the 1% that really have any hope to ever wear an NBA uniform.
Agree 100% that the the NIL-SSS craze is insane, but markets don't have to make sense to thrive. The dot.com bust and the subprime mortgage debacle are two great recent examples.NIL isn't even remotely related to signing an NBA contract which contractually binds a player to a team for a specific period of time. NBA players who are in the superstar class sign marketing contracts totally unrelated to their team contracts for their "name, image and likeness" that are used to market products or services. Their names and images are established in the marketplace and are no different than celebrity endorsements.
High school basketball players and the vast majority of college portal transfer applicants have ZERO established marketability. Let me repeat that ZERO MARKETABILITY.
If I posted the pictures of 50 of the 1500 players in the portal, I would bet your social security check that not one player would be recognized unless you followed the player at his specific school.
So, how is the "marketing value" of a Noah Thomasson established for competitive bidding? While Niagara fans may be familiar with his name and image, is the average resident of Pittsburgh, U.S.A. even vaguely aware or cares who he is??
If Mike Maher's nephew had a choice of playing for a loser coach at Pitt for $30,000 NIL or $20,000 at St. John's and be coached by a coaching legend, Mike would tell him to "go for the money". If, theoretically, a player chooses to sign with a school and coach where he can best learn his trade, why is MONEY , and miniscule $ for the most part, a deciding factor? One can understand the difference if the player were previously nationally established and NBA lottery material. But Noah Thomasson??
Hence, that's where a coach like Rick Pitino knows when to separate the wheat from the chaff. While the player is a legend in the making "in his own mind", Rick Pitino has to weigh his offer versus other future player's value to "his team".
An example would be Gardner. A 4* decom from a Rick Pitino team in the Big East who may get a few thousand bucks more playing in Phoenix in a one bid conference.
Mommy may have told her man-child to go for the money but that greedy shortsighted advice is only advisable for true future stars and the 1% that really have any hope to ever wear an NBA uniform.
Or perhaps Mr. RealisticYou might want to change you screen name to: Mr. Negative
I never characterized Noah or any recruits as a "bad person". Remember, we're not talking hundreds of thousands of dollars for the VAST majority of these guys.Fair enough, and some of the decisions these kids make will no doubt be very short sighted, but when all is said and done, does that automatically mean that Noah(for instance) is going to be a bad teammate? Not sure that taking advantage of the system makes you a bad person. And rest assured, Rick is still going to have to deal with at least some kids who are only coming here because we're offering the most $.
would love for both to sign we usZach texted:
“Of the visits this week, two names to keep an eye on: Oregon State transfer Glenn Taylor Jr. and four-star HS wing Brady Dunlap.”
...was just about to do that!Zach texted:
“Of the visits this week, two names to keep an eye on: Oregon State transfer Glenn Taylor Jr. and four-star HS wing Brady Dunlap.”
A market with a negative return doesn't thrive. It ultimately fails.Agree 100% that the the NIL-SSS craze is insane, but markets don't have to make sense to thrive. The dot.com bust and the subprime mortgage debacle are two great recent examples.
These players have been under the NCAA's thumb for decades, that they're piling into this surprise 'gold rush' to seize the day with both eyes shut.
It's human nature, Can't blame them but hope that as many as possible weight other factors besides the baskets of Benjamins.
I agree with you, but, while it may indeed be fool's gold from a career standpoint for players other than those able to play pro, say in Europe, these guys are chasing Benjamin's rhat do buy real 'stuff'.A market with a negative return doesn't thrive. It ultimately fails.
There really is no gold rush. The vast majority of NIL money is almost laughable. While the NIL is supposed to be unrelated to the college that the player is playing for, if Brony Mahoney was going to wear an Incarnate Word jersey versus wearing a Kentucky jersey, his image would be almost unmarketable. THAT is the reason the top 25 players will always wear a Kansas, Kentucky, UCLA or or similar power 5 school jersey.
What is happening for the other 95% of college players is chasing fools gold because they are and will forever be marginal talents. I can understand loving the game so much that a player enters the market for playing time.
But for that 95% the amount of NIL is negligible.
I'll leave this subject with an example. Last season a neighbor's grandson transferred from a top 100 D1 school to a school in the 200 rating academically to play more minutes and get more NIL. He got around $10,000 in NIL
which was up $5,000 from the school where he was a bench player on for 3 years. He became a starter. In the 8th game of the season he tore a tendon and never made it back to play significant minutes. Kid was a good student but instead of a degree from say Northeastern he now has a degree from an average college. To me, that's
happening way too much these days leaving academics as a low factor in the decision.
Boosters always paid players before NIL without any ROI. They will continue to do so now that it’s legal. That’s all there really is to it. The minute this benefits SJU no one will have an issue with it. Pitino seems to have gotten the top booster for SJU on board so it looks to be moving in the right direction. Everyone on here is old enough to know that money makes the world go round. A lot of these guys don’t come from money like that so 10k/20k is a pay day for them.I agree with you, but, while it may indeed be fool's gold from a career standpoint for players other than those able to play pro, say in Europe, these guys are chasing Benjamin's rhat do buy real 'stuff'.
Let's hope the NIL-$$ craze morphs into a more sane version in the years ahead---maybe driven by market realities like getting 'paid' commensurate with one's contribution to the team.
First let me congratulate you ( my inner kranmars ) on paragraphs !NIL isn't even remotely related to signing an NBA contract which contractually binds a player to a team for a specific period of time. NBA players who are in the superstar class sign marketing contracts totally unrelated to their team contracts for their "name, image and likeness" that are used to market products or services. Their names and images are established in the marketplace and are no different than celebrity endorsements.
High school basketball players and the vast majority of college portal transfer applicants have ZERO established marketability. Let me repeat that ZERO MARKETABILITY.
If I posted the pictures of 50 of the 1500 players in the portal, I would bet your social security check that not one player would be recognized unless you followed the player at his specific school.
So, how is the "marketing value" of a Noah Thomasson established for competitive bidding? While Niagara fans may be familiar with his name and image, is the average resident of Pittsburgh, U.S.A. even vaguely aware or cares who he is??
If Mike Maher's nephew had a choice of playing for a loser coach at Pitt for $30,000 NIL or $20,000 at St. John's and be coached by a coaching legend, Mike would tell him to "go for the money". If, theoretically, a player chooses to sign with a school and coach where he can best learn his trade, why is MONEY , and miniscule $ for the most part, a deciding factor? One can understand the difference if the player were previously nationally established and NBA lottery material. But Noah Thomasson??
Hence, that's where a coach like Rick Pitino knows when to separate the wheat from the chaff. While the player is a legend in the making "in his own mind", Rick Pitino has to weigh his offer versus other future player's value to "his team".
An example would be Gardner. A 4* decom from a Rick Pitino team in the Big East who may get a few thousand bucks more playing in Phoenix in a one bid conference.
Mommy may have told her man-child to go for the money but that greedy shortsighted advice is only advisable for true future stars and the 1% that really have any hope to ever wear an NBA uniform.
……. A lot of these guys don’t come from money like that so 10k/20k is a pay day for them.
Which rsr has a first name beginning with the letter D and ending in N? I've met that one.