yesThe league likely will be stronger on the football side than before if all goes as it seems to be going.
Um, more than a hair. You can't lose two perennial top-10 (if not top-5) programs, replace them with schools that count it a good year if they get an NCAA bid, and describe the dropoff as "a hair less good."Bball will be a hair less good,
true.but the bright side is that it will still likely be the strongest league around.
yesIs it really going to upset anybody that much if SJU doesn't have Cuse and Pitt in our way to the top of the league??
it is true that the new league would need some programs, new or old, to step forward on the basketball side. I don't think it will be Houston, which is if anything worse than SJU in thinking that its glory days were yesterday as opposed to decades ago. But who knows.Fwiw, I like Houston for all sports. They have a nice basketball tradition. They have a lot more final 4's than we domand have been to a national championship. They are a good fit bball-wise. The new schools will just need to make the right coaching hires as the league itself will draw talent. If the football schools get thei BCS bid, the league will be fine and more successful than before.
Need a new commish though.
If Marinatto is able to bring in Boise, Air Force, Navy, Houston, SMU, Central Florida and maybe Temple or Memphis, get the football schools to commit to the league, provide long term stability, raise the exit fee, keep the BCS bid, get a TV contract, and stop the internecine squabbling, I think you have to give him the credit he's due. Maybe he will have been more reactive than active, and maybe he wasn't as aggressive as some would have liked (I would have liked to take 4 from the Big 12 instead of the current scenario), but at the end of the day that would be a fine result given the challenges he had and the landscape that is developing.
OTOH, he hasn't gotten it done yet, so lets' see what happens.