classof2010
Well-known member
There was another big news story the week Chang committed suicide, because the scandal would’ve been national headlines.
What Harrington did years ago doesn’t justify hiring a cheating sleaze today. I’m ashamed at every alumn here calling for disregarding morals and ethics.otis post=452404 said:——-Beast of the East post=452396 said:Harrington was an outsider,
Rev. Father Donald Harrington served as President of St. John’s for 23 consecutive years and you want us to believe he was an “outsider”
spin, spin, spin.
—Proud Alumn post=452430 said:What Harrington did years ago doesn’t justify hiring a cheating sleaze today. I’m ashamed at every alumn here calling for disregarding morals and ethics.
That is a silly misdirection. This isn’t a Harrington Was Bad thread. It’s a Pitino thread. No one here is going to defend Harrington or his unethical actions. Those have nothing to do with whether a fan should favor cheating and a sleazy coach for our alma mater now.otis post=452436 said:—Proud Alumn post=452430 said:What Harrington did years ago doesn’t justify hiring a cheating sleaze today. I’m ashamed at every alumn here calling for disregarding morals and ethics.
it is disappointing that Proud’s post omitted any criticism whatsoever of the alleged misdeeds of the prior most senior administrators at our beloved St. John’s but noted that s/he is “ashamed” of opinions of posters.
let me restate; I am not advocating hiring Mr. Pitino but merely noting that the reported dealings of St. John’s officials have not always been honorable.
IMO, if you criticize Mr. Pitino you must also acknowledge that the conduct of St. John’s officials has not always been distinguishing in a positive manner.
Big difference is that when the university conducted an investigation on Chang's dealings, she was fired and subjected to criminal prosecution. When Harrington and Wile's dealings were discovered, they were both fired immediately. The discussion here is whether or not to hire a coach who has had at least 3 known significant transgressions on his reputation, and likely committed more over a lengthy career. There is no evidence that the dealings of Chang, Harrington, and Wile ever cast a wider net on the university community - and that's my point. Harrington and Wile were finished in education as a result of their deeds. Chang would have gone to jail and be finished also. Pitino, because he satisfies the greed of those wishing to cash in on the spoils of victory, survives.otis post=452436 said:—Proud Alumn post=452430 said:What Harrington did years ago doesn’t justify hiring a cheating sleaze today. I’m ashamed at every alumn here calling for disregarding morals and ethics.
it is disappointing that Proud’s post omitted any criticism whatsoever of the alleged misdeeds of the prior most senior administrators at our beloved St. John’s but noted that s/he is “ashamed” of opinions of posters.
let me restate; I am not advocating hiring Mr. Pitino but merely noting that the reported dealings of St. John’s officials have not always been honorable.
IMO, if you criticize Mr. Pitino you must also acknowledge that the conduct of St. John’s officials has not always been distinguishing in a positive manner.
Could not possibly agree with you Proud Alum. The thread is about Pitino whom everyone acknowledges is one of the greatest coaches of modern era. The only reason behind not hiring him at SJU is his past transgresssions. Posters have correctly pointed out that SJU itself has been involved in more than one horrible transgressions. So before we throw stones maybe we should look in the mirror. Comparing apples with apples.Proud Alumn post=452438 said:That is a silly misdirection. This isn’t a Harrington Was Bad thread. It’s a Pitino thread. No one here is going to defend Harrington or his unethical actions. Those have nothing to do with whether a fan should favor cheating and a sleazy coach for our alma mater now.otis post=452436 said:—Proud Alumn post=452430 said:What Harrington did years ago doesn’t justify hiring a cheating sleaze today. I’m ashamed at every alumn here calling for disregarding morals and ethics.
it is disappointing that Proud’s post omitted any criticism whatsoever of the alleged misdeeds of the prior most senior administrators at our beloved St. John’s but noted that s/he is “ashamed” of opinions of posters.
let me restate; I am not advocating hiring Mr. Pitino but merely noting that the reported dealings of St. John’s officials have not always been honorable.
IMO, if you criticize Mr. Pitino you must also acknowledge that the conduct of St. John’s officials has not always been distinguishing in a positive manner.
First off, St. John's would be standing with every school who did not move to consider Pitino.redmannorth post=452441 said:Could not possibly agree with you Proud Alum. The thread is about Pitino whom everyone acknowledges is one of the greatest coaches of modern era. The only reason behind not hiring him at SJU is his past transgresssions. Posters have correctly pointed out that SJU itself has been involved in more than one horrible transgressions. So before we throw stones maybe we should look in the mirror. Comparing apples with apples.Proud Alumn post=452438 said:That is a silly misdirection. This isn’t a Harrington Was Bad thread. It’s a Pitino thread. No one here is going to defend Harrington or his unethical actions. Those have nothing to do with whether a fan should favor cheating and a sleazy coach for our alma mater now.otis post=452436 said:—Proud Alumn post=452430 said:What Harrington did years ago doesn’t justify hiring a cheating sleaze today. I’m ashamed at every alumn here calling for disregarding morals and ethics.
it is disappointing that Proud’s post omitted any criticism whatsoever of the alleged misdeeds of the prior most senior administrators at our beloved St. John’s but noted that s/he is “ashamed” of opinions of posters.
let me restate; I am not advocating hiring Mr. Pitino but merely noting that the reported dealings of St. John’s officials have not always been honorable.
IMO, if you criticize Mr. Pitino you must also acknowledge that the conduct of St. John’s officials has not always been distinguishing in a positive manner.
This is illogical. If you had some indication that the school is currently engaging in and condoning unethical behavior, that would be relevant. What Harrington did years ago, and that he was pushed out and the other actors fired for it, is irrelevant to hiring a cheating sleaze coach today.redmannorth post=452441 said:Could not possibly agree with you Proud Alum. The thread is about Pitino whom everyone acknowledges is one of the greatest coaches of modern era. The only reason behind not hiring him at SJU is his past transgresssions. Posters have correctly pointed out that SJU itself has been involved in more than one horrible transgressions. So before we throw stones maybe we should look in the mirror. Comparing apples with apples.Proud Alumn post=452438 said:That is a silly misdirection. This isn’t a Harrington Was Bad thread. It’s a Pitino thread. No one here is going to defend Harrington or his unethical actions. Those have nothing to do with whether a fan should favor cheating and a sleazy coach for our alma mater now.otis post=45243 said:otis post=45243
Fuchsia I'm not saying that you're wrong, but explain to me why the suits at the NCAA would want to sabotage the only high D1 team in the largest media market in the entire country? I don't get it purely from a monetary standpoint, but then again I don't get a lot of things.fuchsia post=452498 said:I am old enough to remember a time when there was on-going discussion about whether the NCAA or the NIT was the true national championship tournament in Men's BB. I started at NYU the year after Satch led them to the Final Four of the NCAA. Ohio St. with Jerry Lucas won the NCAA and Bradley won the NIT. Given that the National Media was centered in New York City the presence of one of New York's premier teams drew attention to whatever tournament they were in.
I bring this up because some part of me suspects that there is even today a lingering anti-STJ anti-NY bias in the NCAA. Any opportunity to taint NY hoops is too easy to pass up by the Indiana based governance of the NCAA.
It means that hiring any coach with a less than stellar cleanliness record is higher risk for STJ than any other program... which may be the bottom line on us never touching Pitino.
And of course, when Digger left Fordham, he wound up in Indiana.
Definitely trolling fan base and perhaps the coach as well.RedStormNC post=453874 said:Zach article - knows how to time articles to rile up the frustrated portion of the SJU base
In just his second year, Rick Pitino has made Iona a MAAC powerhouse
https://nypost.com/2022/01/29/how-r...utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=SocialFlow
otis post=453876 said:Gee, it seems that if Mr. Braziller did not read Redmen.com then he would have to come up with his own ideas as to what to write.
Moose post=452508 said:I want to see Pitino at SJU just for the pure enjoyment factor of seeing the little that's left of the fanbase imploding.