Anyway, Kentucky starts 3 freshman and 2 sophs.. They are 19 and 1.. While it's likely Kentucky could beat a lot of NBA teams, they have 2, maybe 3 lottery picks.. We do not.. But, they are nearly as young and inexperienced as we are. Their results are better. quote)
Reread your post.
Kentucky starts two sophomores who played in their system last season.
We don't have anyone like those two. Their 3 freshman were all ranked much higher than Mo and DLo, who are doing great.
Our starting pg who was our leading scorer quit after 9 games.
Now you understand why Kentucky which has much more experience than us has a better record.
Thank you, RMN.. i did re-read my post.. If you re-read it also, you will note I'm referring to team performance not individual performance... Can you honestly say the team's performance is appreciably better than earlier in the season? Some of our kids have had great individual games, without a doubt..
St John's should have beat Nova Today and did not.. The team did not function when the game was theirs for the taking..
That's a concern in my book.
As for Kentucky.. The reference was clear as to experience levels, etc.. Which I still submit is nearly true.. Yes, the 2 sophs were there last year but, they still start 3 freshman, one less than us..Yes, their players are better but, they are still about the same age,etc as our guys.
And, my point was simply that many fans here are excusing poor team performance solely as a function of youth..I don't think that can be continued to be used as a way of explaining some team weaknesses that haven't improved,i.e foul shooting, defense,etc.