[quote="Beast of the East" post=287753][quote="Paultzman" post=287750][quote="Logen" post=287745]Been a Met fan since Day 1 but let's face it, with infrequent short interludes the Mets have just been a consistently bad organization. I certainly still root but it is tough. I agree with LaDuca to the point that the Mets (Alderson and co.) basically put all their eggs in the young arms and outside of deGrom and to a lesser extent Syndegaard they have been busts. Every day players? Really no one on the team worth getting excited over. Rosario, has serious potential but he is still a baby with a lot of holes in that swing. Conforto? Potential has to turn into production eventually so also a disappointment. It appears someone or something convinced him to forego that beautiful swing to uppercut for homers, a la David Wright a few years into his career. . Cespedes? Ton of ability but in reality an inconsistent too often injured player. Bullpen, a disaster. No help on the farm. Adds up to same old Mets.[/quote]
Spot on.[/quote]
Mets typically cheap out. Their big investment was Cespedes. They could have guaranteed a killer 1-3 in the rotation by investing in Arrieta, which would have made them front runners. Instead they invested in a bust.[/quote]
How about Moustakas instead of Frazier? Cain instead of Bruce? Insert Cain and he leads off. Mouse plays 3rd and bats 3rd or 4th. Line-up would have made more sense and defense of Cain would have pushed Conforto to more natural RF. Also Cain would help produce runs instead of waiting for HRs. Both are closer to .300 hitters than Bruce or Frazier.
The common thread? Bruce and Frazier were CHEAPER. Guess who Mets signed?