redfan259999888
Active member
[quote="JohnnyFan" post=284461][quote="Logen" post=284459][quote="Mike Zaun" post=284238][quote="Logen" post=284232][quote="Chicago Days" post=284229][quote="NCJohnnie" post=284217]In my view, we should be a little less specific in our expectations in terms of recruits. I think team needs to win 20 games next year, make the dance and sign a couple of approximately 4 star recruits for 2019. Would love for one to be Kofi, but who knows. Anything less than the tournament next year is a major miss.[/quote]
Hi NCJohnnie. Minimum win totals to qualify for the NCAA aren't written in stone, but 20 wins by us may get us in the NIT--not the NCAA. That'd be a major bummer I think and likely a recruiting setback.
I agree it's likely 'healthy' to not 'expect' to get certain recruits--but Kofi and JG are the two most-mentioned of our 2019 top targets.
This Board would erupt like Mt. Kilauea on the Big Island (Hawaii) IF we missed on those two and two very credible alternatives were not 'netted' in a NY minute afterwards.
Can you imagine?!!?[/quote]
This board is an anti-Mullin pile of unrealistic expectations now and has been almost since his hiring. Why, I don’t know. By any measure he has done a decent job but many here obviously think that his yardstick is one that some of the greatest modern coaches didn’t meet. The fact he inherited NOTHING and was COMPLETELY inexperienced means nothing. I would get the criticism if pointed towards his hiring but at the end of the day, he was hired. I will not post the basketball arguments I have previously posted because no Mullin haters will address them because they can’t but most people I talk to outside of this board think Mullin has done a phenomenal job in getting the program to a quasi-respectable level this quickly. I realize that is just not good enough for most here, criticism is easy especially when one ignores context completely.
The two criticisms I agree with are the hiring of Rohressen and the inability to get a big who could play. Emphasis on “who could play.” We have tried and struck out and depth matters, having a flexible roster matters. But the fact remains we missed LoVett last year more than a big and I wonder what the tenor of the board would be had he not turned out to be a quitter.[/quote]
Battling DePaul for last place for the past 3 years is doing a "decent" job? These past 3 years have been some of the worst in program history and they might even be a low water mark in the 100+ year history. If they aren't the actual low water mark, they have to be close. We all knew it was a big task but Mullin was given a grace period. The evidence is that he is in over his head, which is why there are national articles having him firmly on the hot seat. This is a competitive business...you can't let nostalgia cloud reality. We all love Mullin the player. We all love Mullin the person. But he has shown no ability to coach this program to the point of competing for NCAA berths thus far. What is the evidence you are going by to back your claim that he has been doing "decent"? Of course he started with nothing. But guess what? He has something, and he hasn't done anything with that something other than a few shocking OOC wins. No one is talking about year 1. He just finished year 3 and is on to year 4. You can't hide behind his first year when he was afforded honeymoon status. Let's talk about the here and now. The experiment has been an objective failure, however he has 1 more season to prove he can right the ship. I will wish him the best while also trusting my gut based on the evidence thus far.[/quote]
Again, still you and others don’t recognize or acknowledge any context to Mullin’s three years. You are the type of “fan” who would have looked for Jay Wright’s, K’s, or Calhoun’s job after a similar time span as Mullin. You offer the “battling DePaul” nonsense when all it does for me is show me how little you know about the game, program building, or just basketball in general. But don’t feel bad, this board is full of people with as little knowledge or perspective as you. So keep posting, I can use the laughs. It breaks up the monotony of trying to figure out how a staff that doesn’t recruit has a full roster.[/quote]
To be fair, I think the unrest is not an issue of being impatient about results. It's more about the perception of effort, strategy and the flawed make-up of the staff. I would guess Wright, K and Calhoun were not using the hands-off, unorthodox approach that we are seeing with Mullin.[/quote]
It's ok fan, I'm sure Chris thinks this his way can work.
Gotta show that it can in year 4.
Hi NCJohnnie. Minimum win totals to qualify for the NCAA aren't written in stone, but 20 wins by us may get us in the NIT--not the NCAA. That'd be a major bummer I think and likely a recruiting setback.
I agree it's likely 'healthy' to not 'expect' to get certain recruits--but Kofi and JG are the two most-mentioned of our 2019 top targets.
This Board would erupt like Mt. Kilauea on the Big Island (Hawaii) IF we missed on those two and two very credible alternatives were not 'netted' in a NY minute afterwards.
Can you imagine?!!?[/quote]
This board is an anti-Mullin pile of unrealistic expectations now and has been almost since his hiring. Why, I don’t know. By any measure he has done a decent job but many here obviously think that his yardstick is one that some of the greatest modern coaches didn’t meet. The fact he inherited NOTHING and was COMPLETELY inexperienced means nothing. I would get the criticism if pointed towards his hiring but at the end of the day, he was hired. I will not post the basketball arguments I have previously posted because no Mullin haters will address them because they can’t but most people I talk to outside of this board think Mullin has done a phenomenal job in getting the program to a quasi-respectable level this quickly. I realize that is just not good enough for most here, criticism is easy especially when one ignores context completely.
The two criticisms I agree with are the hiring of Rohressen and the inability to get a big who could play. Emphasis on “who could play.” We have tried and struck out and depth matters, having a flexible roster matters. But the fact remains we missed LoVett last year more than a big and I wonder what the tenor of the board would be had he not turned out to be a quitter.[/quote]
Battling DePaul for last place for the past 3 years is doing a "decent" job? These past 3 years have been some of the worst in program history and they might even be a low water mark in the 100+ year history. If they aren't the actual low water mark, they have to be close. We all knew it was a big task but Mullin was given a grace period. The evidence is that he is in over his head, which is why there are national articles having him firmly on the hot seat. This is a competitive business...you can't let nostalgia cloud reality. We all love Mullin the player. We all love Mullin the person. But he has shown no ability to coach this program to the point of competing for NCAA berths thus far. What is the evidence you are going by to back your claim that he has been doing "decent"? Of course he started with nothing. But guess what? He has something, and he hasn't done anything with that something other than a few shocking OOC wins. No one is talking about year 1. He just finished year 3 and is on to year 4. You can't hide behind his first year when he was afforded honeymoon status. Let's talk about the here and now. The experiment has been an objective failure, however he has 1 more season to prove he can right the ship. I will wish him the best while also trusting my gut based on the evidence thus far.[/quote]
Again, still you and others don’t recognize or acknowledge any context to Mullin’s three years. You are the type of “fan” who would have looked for Jay Wright’s, K’s, or Calhoun’s job after a similar time span as Mullin. You offer the “battling DePaul” nonsense when all it does for me is show me how little you know about the game, program building, or just basketball in general. But don’t feel bad, this board is full of people with as little knowledge or perspective as you. So keep posting, I can use the laughs. It breaks up the monotony of trying to figure out how a staff that doesn’t recruit has a full roster.[/quote]
To be fair, I think the unrest is not an issue of being impatient about results. It's more about the perception of effort, strategy and the flawed make-up of the staff. I would guess Wright, K and Calhoun were not using the hands-off, unorthodox approach that we are seeing with Mullin.[/quote]
It's ok fan, I'm sure Chris thinks this his way can work.
Gotta show that it can in year 4.
Last edited: