It pains me to see these threads because they often reveal the irreconcilable differences between some of us and the 'student-athlete'. As fans we only care about the player's grades so long as the kid is productive on the court, so as to maintain his eligibility. We only care about their graduation rates as they affect our ranking, and not necessarily the individual. We cling to the notion that we offer an opportunity to obtain a free education that maybe transformative, when in reality we cut kids and send them off via transfer when they don't perform to our needs. I like to think we at St. John's are better than that, but we're not. Moving on to the next player is what we do, but not before we kick some dirt on the kid first, blaming him entirely for his lack of planning (he and we all embraced an idea of a 2 year stop before the NBA), ambivalence to classes, and need to keep returning to Philly for one difficulty or another.
How about the fact that no one seemed to blink that this kid was kept away from the media for two years? Or how about the fact that his homophobic tweets demonstrated a rage and lack of maturity? Or, perhaps the biggest problem, his family circle's complete and unrealistic view of his greatness and his ability to lift them from despair. A winning lottery ticket for a family living in a world not conducive to supporting and assisting a college student. Rasheed Jordan's potential ineligibility isn't lamentable, it's predictable. If there was any player I blame Coach Lavin for the predicament, it's Jordan. So highly touted, so seductive with his talent, and so vital to Lavin's future, that there was no contingency plan for him or the school. He came to school here for basketball, now we're demanding to know why he didn't care enough about classes. I hope he becomes eligible, positions himself well for the draft, and maybe wins a few games for us. But if he doesn't do any of these things, I'm not going to insult him on his way out the door, I knew what this relationship really is about.