So to sum it up:
Dunn positives: physical and mental toughness, takes ball-handling pressure off of Posh, experience, good on-ball defense, makes some good passes, willing to attack the rim, unafraid of having the ball in his hands at crunch time, a decent-but-not-great overall free-throw shooter but tends to make them at the end of the game.
Dunn negatives: Can't shoot the 3 at all; doesn't shoot the midrange jumper enough to know whether it's good, bad or just streaky; doesn't use the pull-up in the lane that would really help his game; makes some bad decisions with the ball (what point guard doesn't); and (my personal pet peeve) if he gets the ball with 12 seconds or less on the shot clock there is a 90% probability that he will drive the lane, a 10% probability that he will take some other shot, and a 0% probability that he will kick it to an open teammate.
What I would say about the various end-of-game comments which as Logen noted range from wants the ball in his hands to turnovers to freezes is that it's all part of the Dunn package: he is a tough kid who is willing to take the game on his shoulders. The result of that is that he sometimes (too often) tries to do too much in pressure situations and that's what results in the fumbles and turnovers in those spots. I don't think it's remotely fair to say he "freezes," that is not a characteristic of a guy who's looking to make a play to win the game.
Is he a good player to have on your team? Absolutely - in the correct role and correct situations. Unlike most of the others on the roster, he's past the point where you can expect him to add that many tools to his toolkit. But he has useful tools when used properly.
Fair enough?
Fair points. Maybe I shouldn't of said he freezes is up. But there have been one to many times we were not able to get a shot off at the end of games