Dunn

In the minority here, but I don't think GW's absence from the lineup and the wining streak are unrelated.  Actually, I think that combined with Dunn's reorientation as a pass first point guard has made a huge difference.  GW's inconsistency does not warrant, IMHO, the assumption that he gets starters minutes.  I don't think his track record supports that, especially when he's coming back to a team on a roll.  
 
montyaloofah" post=416315 said:
If he comes back, he needs to work on his jump shot. Developing just a mid range jump shot opens up his drive so much more

If Posh, Cole, etc are knocking down the 3, it opens up the court and  I think it's far less important that Dunn do so. Still think that with his quickness and strength, he'll be able to get to the hoop. 
 
 
redmanwest" post=416317 said:
In the minority here, but I don't think GW's absence from the lineup and the wining streak are unrelated.  Actually, I think that combined with Dunn's reorientation as a pass first point guard has made a huge difference.  GW's inconsistency does not warrant, IMHO, the assumption that he gets starters minutes.  I don't think his track record supports that, especially when he's coming back to a team on a roll.  

Could not agree more. GW is so overated on this board.
 
 
redmanwest" post=416317 said:
In the minority here, but I don't think GW's absence from the lineup and the wining streak are unrelated.  Actually, I think that combined with Dunn's reorientation as a pass first point guard has made a huge difference.  GW's inconsistency does not warrant, IMHO, the assumption that he gets starters minutes.  I don't think his track record supports that, especially when he's coming back to a team on a roll.  

I like the starting line up exactly as it is, but there's still plenty of minutes for GWill backing up Posh, Dunn and Cole. 
 
One of the main reasons for Dunn's and SJU improved play this season is the fewer three point attempts by Dunn this season.. He has never been a three point shooter and at the end of last season he had started to stop taking threes and SJU was a better team. He has played the same way this season and by limiting his game to fifteen ft jump shots and taking the ball to the rim he is a better player. He has only made two threes this season but his attempts which last year were basically turnovers are way down.
 
 
I'll gladly welcome him back since we know what we'll be getting out of him and he's a good guy. But if he moves on, I'd like to know sooner rather than later so staff can plan accordingly if they want bring in someone else in.
 
Paultzman" post=416272 said:
Zach B
St. John's guard Rasheem Dunn, a fifth-year senior, tells me he hasn't really thought about next year, but he is open to returning. Said school  has been really good to him. 

I'd love it!  He's my favorite player on the team.  He's not perfect -- who is -- but he's a high character kid who is all heart.  He has embraced his role as a mentor and distributor and  he makes others better.
 
Different team once Dunn was healthy and up to speed

Can't wait to get Greg Williams Jr back. He's a solid player. Shooting extremely well. 
 
MainMan" post=416285 said:
He has far and away the best blow-by speed of anyone on the roster. 

I hope he comes back too.
The problem occurs when 2 more guys are waiting for him, knowing he won't pull up for a 12 footer.
 
redmanwest" post=416317 said:
In the minority here, but I don't think GW's absence from the lineup and the wining streak are unrelated.  Actually, I think that combined with Dunn's reorientation as a pass first point guard has made a huge difference.  GW's inconsistency does not warrant, IMHO, the assumption that he gets starters minutes.  I don't think his track record supports that, especially when he's coming back to a team on a roll.  

GW plays within the flow.  Whether he starts or not, I'm agnostic,  but the team is better with him in the lineup.  Give him some of Cole's minutes.  He is shooting the ball better than Cole, is a better driver, and is a far superior defender.
 
 
If it works for Dunn, it would be great to have him back. He will never be a great three point shooter and he has wisely scaled back his attempts. His shooting this season inside the arc is better as is his shot selection. He struggled a little with free throw shooting after he got back from the concussion but has been lights out recently. He is making some great passes and is not turning the ball over. He always plays hard on defense and what Posh says about his leadership abilities say a lot about him and also say a lot about Posh being a team player.

Other than Toro who unfortunately hasnt worked out, I would want everyone else to return. Coach does a good job keeping everyone involved and rewards good play and effort. There doesn't appear to be any problems with team chemistry. 

As for Greg Williams, I dont understand how you can say that we are winning because he is hurt. I think we are winning in spite of him being hurt which is a real positive. I dont care if he is or isnt "overrated" on the board. He has been a very sound player this season who will help us a lot when he plays again. His minutes will come down as he recovers and I am sure CMA will make him earn his minutes as he gets better.
 
Monte" post=416323 said:
redmanwest" post=416317 said:
In the minority here, but I don't think GW's absence from the lineup and the wining streak are unrelated.  Actually, I think that combined with Dunn's reorientation as a pass first point guard has made a huge difference.  GW's inconsistency does not warrant, IMHO, the assumption that he gets starters minutes.  I don't think his track record supports that, especially when he's coming back to a team on a roll.  

I like the starting line up exactly as it is, but there's still plenty of minutes for GWill backing up Posh, Dunn and Cole. 

What exactly has Cole done that he should be starting over Greg?
 
I dont see any way Dunn doesnt come back.  Whats the alternative?  getting a job?

The Garden and Carnesseca are going to be rocking next year and Dunn got a gift to return.  Hed be crazy not to come back.
 
If a senior returns due to this extra year of eligibility, is it on a scholarship too?  Wouldn't all schools be well over their scholarshop allotment (13, I think) with incoming freshmen included?  Please help me understand how this is going to work.
 
I seriously doubt CMA is going to mess with the starting lineup the way they are playing right now. If it's not broke, don't fix it. 
 
mm52" post=416340 said:
If a senior returns due to this extra year of eligibility, is it on a scholarship too?  Wouldn't all schools be well over their scholarshop allotment (13, I think) with incoming freshmen included?  Please help me understand how this is going to work.
NCAA instituted flexible roster caps in response to COVID for coming year. Also with transfer mania, someone here will likely leave, nature if beast.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boo Harvey" post=416337 said:
Monte" post=416323 said:
redmanwest" post=416317 said:
In the minority here, but I don't think GW's absence from the lineup and the wining streak are unrelated.  Actually, I think that combined with Dunn's reorientation as a pass first point guard has made a huge difference.  GW's inconsistency does not warrant, IMHO, the assumption that he gets starters minutes.  I don't think his track record supports that, especially when he's coming back to a team on a roll.  

I like the starting line up exactly as it is, but there's still plenty of minutes for GWill backing up Posh, Dunn and Cole. 

What exactly has Cole done that he should be starting over Greg?

He's been shooting the ball much better over the last 3 games, and his outside scoring adds another dimension to our offense and opens up the court for others to drive. Also he's playing with confidence right now.
 
 
Monte" post=416343 said:
Boo Harvey" post=416337 said:
Monte" post=416323 said:
redmanwest" post=416317 said:
In the minority here, but I don't think GW's absence from the lineup and the wining streak are unrelated.  Actually, I think that combined with Dunn's reorientation as a pass first point guard has made a huge difference.  GW's inconsistency does not warrant, IMHO, the assumption that he gets starters minutes.  I don't think his track record supports that, especially when he's coming back to a team on a roll.  

I like the starting line up exactly as it is, but there's still plenty of minutes for GWill backing up Posh, Dunn and Cole. 

What exactly has Cole done that he should be starting over Greg?

He's been shooting the ball much better over the last 3 games, and his outside scoring adds another dimension to our offense and opens up the court for others to drive. Also he's playing with confidence right now.

 
Right now I agree. Leave everything as is. Cole is running well. Even if it's mostly symbolic why give a guy who is starting to play with confidence even a symbolic demotion? Get Williams in off the bench for now. He'll get his minutes. If you look at the minute distribution. The 4 guys on this team who Anderson always gives heavy minutes to (as long as they're healthy and not in foul trouble) are Champagnie, Posh, Dunn and Williams. Those are the only 4 guys who are always guaranteed around 30 mins. Everyone else seems to fall in and out of his good graces but based on Anderson's actions those are the 4 he appears to fully trust at this point whether we agree with him or not. I feel like I'm starting to ramble but my main point is I think if Williams is healthy he's definetly playing a bunch so why mess with whatver routine has Cole playing well? Odds are he may hit a cold streak in a few games and a good, swift demotion to the bench may be a nice motivator to keep in the back pocket. Who knows.
 
Back
Top