Coaching Carousel

Rhode Island package for Archie Miller

Some contract details for Archie Miller:
- 5-year deal worth $8.5M
- Staff salary pool of $765K
- Increased commitment to charter flights
- Practice facility construction starting summer 2022, completed summer 2023
- Buyout clause starting at $1M in April 2023

@BillKoch25
 
Paultzman post=464850 said:
Rhode Island package for Archie Miller

Some contract details for Archie Miller:
- 5-year deal worth $8.5M
- Staff salary pool of $765K
- Increased commitment to charter flights
- Practice facility construction starting summer 2022, completed summer 2023
- Buyout clause starting at $1M in April 2023

@BillKoch25

Archie Miller is still so young at 43 that if he kills it he will be back in a high major soon or he could bounce around and be our coach in fifteen years or so.

 
 
Last edited:
SJU85 post=464854 said:
Paultzman post=464849 said:
https://twitter.com/petethamel/status/1504867109691658274?s=21

Done deal according to The Athletic

The next time someone complains about transfers and player loyalty, keep in mind this guy was coaching San Fran less than 12 hours ago. 
 
If Willard goes to Maryland and Holloway to Seton , on some level we are going to have to recruit against him and Holloway. Will not be easy.
 
dee post=464807 said:
Amazing how Kentucky fans want Calipari's scalp after the loss to St Peters. So much different than here at st johns where we only dream of having a coach who could get us to the NCAA or even NIT. Kentucky has a much higher bar
 


Just goes to show that there are idiots on every board with unrealistic expectations.  Was the loss disappointing?  Sure. So was this season for SJU.  Stuff happens. 

Pre COVID Cal had UK in 8 of 11 sweet sixteens.  He was a projected 2 seed in the cancelled tourney and a 2 seed this year.  Freak loss and a bunch of fools go crazy.  Seen it before.  Will see it again.  Cal's going nowhere unless he wants to, coaching warts and all.
 
Was Calipari the guy who was spreading rumors about Louie’s health back in the day?
 
Knight post=464867 said:
Was Calipari the guy who was spreading rumors about Louie’s health back in the day?

Allegedly when he was AC at Pitt recruiting Bobby Martin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SJU85 post=464815 said:
Jermane Attoil post=464813 said:
dee post=464807 said:
Amazing how Kentucky fans want Calipari's scalp after the loss to St Peters. So much different than here at st johns where we only dream of having a coach who could get us to the NCAA or even NIT. Kentucky has a much higher bar
Given the current state of this program, you would be hard pressed to find a D1 Major with a lower bar then St. John’s. I’m just stunned that posters are happy about a coach returning who after high pre season expectations couldn’t even make the NIT? But I guess as long as Cragg and Anderson keep up the hype about wanting to win a National Championship some will fall for it.  
You have a one team in a situation where they are a blueblood, normal top Ten Team with Top five recruiting classes and a history of SEC and NCAA (8) championships who have not won the SEC Tourny since 2017 and a National Championship since  2012 with a demanding fan base.  Kentucky fans are not just upset over last night but this has been brewing for quite some time.  Despite his flashy recruiting classes and NBA players, they feel he hasn't brought home the bacon, championships and they are restless.

Then you have us without any of the above cache who are fighting for relevance in this City, let alone the entire college landscape.   
As long as we believe that we are a down trodden program that can’t attract a great coach, can’t recruit well, can’t compete with the Blue Bloods then we will remain that way. I have to believe that the biggest reason the program has been down for so long, not winning an NCAA tourney game in 22 years, is the low expectations held by the school administration, the alumni and most of the fan base. Oh sure, current and past administrations will talk about wanting to win championships and compete at the highest level but have they put their money where their mouth is? Whether you like Anderson or not, was he the best candidate for the job? Would a bit more money have lured a top currently employed, successful coach away from another program?  Has the school been unaware or too short sited to see the tremendous financial potential of a successful hoops program? Is it surprising that Villanova endowment is far greater then St. John’s with many less graduates?

I have always had high expectations for the program probably cause I’m old enough to remember the good years which makes me less tolerant or patient than many on this site. If I personally lower the expectations bar, I myself will lose interest. And no, I am not an Anderson hater, but I do hold him to a high standard as I did for prior coaches and will do for future ones as well (if I’m around that long) /media/kunena/emoticons/dizzy.png Simply, I’m  tired of watching NCAA tourney games without the Johnnies in it.
 
All this talk about CMA versus other coaches needs to be assessed. Folks are looking to compare this year's results with the latest "wunderkind" coach of the moment.  Holloway has done it for one season, prior to this year 42-45 at St. Peter's in his first 3 years (and has not beat CMA, losing this year by 21).  Some have said over the years that we should have hired Pikiell.  In his first 3 years at Rutgers, he went 44-54, In year 5 he went to NCAAs with a 15-11 record, the same as we had.  In Willard's first three years, at the Hall, he went 49-48.  In the next 2 years he went one game over 500 and in year 6 he got to NCAA's.  IN CMA's first 3 years, St. John's went 50-41.  While noy achieving the tournament this year was/is disappointing, I ponder if we would have thought as highly as the other 3 "wunderkinds" if they had performed here as they did in their first 3 years.
 
Sources: San Francisco is again going to promote from within and hire Chris Gerlufsen to replace Todd Golden as its head coach. This happened three years ago when Golden got the job after Kyle Smith for Washington State.

@MattNorlander
 
Jermane Attoil post=464883 said:
SJU85 post=464815 said:
Jermane Attoil post=464813 said:
dee post=464807 said:
Amazing how Kentucky fans want Calipari's scalp after the loss to St Peters. So much different than here at st johns where we only dream of having a coach who could get us to the NCAA or even NIT. Kentucky has a much higher bar
Given the current state of this program, you would be hard pressed to find a D1 Major with a lower bar then St. John’s. I’m just stunned that posters are happy about a coach returning who after high pre season expectations couldn’t even make the NIT? But I guess as long as Cragg and Anderson keep up the hype about wanting to win a National Championship some will fall for it.  
You have a one team in a situation where they are a blueblood, normal top Ten Team with Top five recruiting classes and a history of SEC and NCAA (8) championships who have not won the SEC Tourny since 2017 and a National Championship since  2012 with a demanding fan base.  Kentucky fans are not just upset over last night but this has been brewing for quite some time.  Despite his flashy recruiting classes and NBA players, they feel he hasn't brought home the bacon, championships and they are restless.

Then you have us without any of the above cache who are fighting for relevance in this City, let alone the entire college landscape.   
As long as we believe that we are a down trodden program that can’t attract a great coach, can’t recruit well, can’t compete with the Blue Bloods then we will remain that way. I have to believe that the biggest reason the program has been down for so long, not winning an NCAA tourney game in 22 years, is the low expectations held by the school administration, the alumni and most of the fan base. Oh sure, current and past administrations will talk about wanting to win championships and compete at the highest level but have they put their money where their mouth is? Whether you like Anderson or not, was he the best candidate for the job? Would a bit more money have lured a top currently employed, successful coach away from another program?  Has the school been unaware or too short sited to see the tremendous financial potential of a successful hoops program? Is it surprising that Villanova endowment is far greater then St. John’s with many less graduates?

I have always had high expectations for the program probably cause I’m old enough to remember the good years which makes me less tolerant or patient than many on this site. If I personally lower the expectations bar, I myself will lose interest. And no, I am not an Anderson hater, but I do hold him to a high standard as I did for prior coaches and will do for future ones as well (if I’m around that long) /media/kunena/emoticons/dizzy.png Simply, I’m  tired of watching NCAA tourney games without the Johnnies in it.
While it is good to remember history and learn from it, your bringing up ghosts who are no longer here who ran the program and the school for that matter as a mom and pop establishment.  Those days are gone with new regimes place who actually have a clue and a plan.

Throw out more money at an established coach and see who would come.  Okay, who are you referring to?  And why would they leave their established program?  And let’s not forget we haven’t exactly been cheap with the past three head coaches and their staffs.  And don’t give me Pitino and you can debate it all you want but he wasn’t getting the job but surely their are others right, just lining up?  So who?

We are what we are and one thing has been proven, making the tourny one year doesn’t mean a thing here because it hasn’t been maintained.  Was that because we didn’t stay the course with those coaches that were in place that time or something else.

This program has serious problems as we all know.  We’ve watched coaches implode (Fran and Jarvis), poor hires who were probably bad hires and in the first place who were kept to long (Roberts) a coach who might have been able to sustain something but lost the drive and knew he was being shown the door (Lavin) and an icon who did not really understand all it took to do the job and left with not much to help (Mullin). And while the last search was poorly done and executed, so was the one done by UCLA and they were in a helluva lot better shape as a program than us.  They got it right apparently, here’s hoping the same.

Now we already have a program that looks like it in disarray with the comings on goings of coaches.  Anderson getting fired after last season would have added more fuel to the fire and who is coming then?  And if he left for Tulsa???  I mean really, Tulsa?

Sometimes you have to temper expectations and goals to something achievable.  I don’t think that anyone on this Board only wants to make the NCAA’s once in awhile and be a regular the NIT or is satisfied on our current state.  Most don’t repeat themselves over and over.  But you seem to want us to turn into a blue blood over night and that isn’t realistic in our current situation.  Take the next step.  For me is to finish in the top half of the conference, make some noise in both tournaments and do it again.   Build something that can be sustained and as you do those goals become bigger.  If we are changing coaches now, the same question applies, who and I will ask why.

Last thing about, Roberts because some of the hatred thrown at him bothers me.  He was a nice guy but a horrible coach who would kids to listen but not close the deal mostly because they didn’t honk he could win and get them where they wanted to go.  I get it bad coach who stayed in the job too long but feel some have made it into more than that and personal.

Sorry for the long winded post and probable typos.
 
SJU85 post=464901 said:
Jermane Attoil post=464883 said:
SJU85 post=464815 said:
Jermane Attoil post=464813 said:
dee post=464807 said:
Amazing how Kentucky fans want Calipari's scalp after the loss to St Peters. So much different than here at st johns where we only dream of having a coach who could get us to the NCAA or even NIT. Kentucky has a much higher bar
Given the current state of this program, you would be hard pressed to find a D1 Major with a lower bar then St. John’s. I’m just stunned that posters are happy about a coach returning who after high pre season expectations couldn’t even make the NIT? But I guess as long as Cragg and Anderson keep up the hype about wanting to win a National Championship some will fall for it.  
You have a one team in a situation where they are a blueblood, normal top Ten Team with Top five recruiting classes and a history of SEC and NCAA (8) championships who have not won the SEC Tourny since 2017 and a National Championship since  2012 with a demanding fan base.  Kentucky fans are not just upset over last night but this has been brewing for quite some time.  Despite his flashy recruiting classes and NBA players, they feel he hasn't brought home the bacon, championships and they are restless.

Then you have us without any of the above cache who are fighting for relevance in this City, let alone the entire college landscape.   
As long as we believe that we are a down trodden program that can’t attract a great coach, can’t recruit well, can’t compete with the Blue Bloods then we will remain that way. I have to believe that the biggest reason the program has been down for so long, not winning an NCAA tourney game in 22 years, is the low expectations held by the school administration, the alumni and most of the fan base. Oh sure, current and past administrations will talk about wanting to win championships and compete at the highest level but have they put their money where their mouth is? Whether you like Anderson or not, was he the best candidate for the job? Would a bit more money have lured a top currently employed, successful coach away from another program?  Has the school been unaware or too short sited to see the tremendous financial potential of a successful hoops program? Is it surprising that Villanova endowment is far greater then St. John’s with many less graduates?

I have always had high expectations for the program probably cause I’m old enough to remember the good years which makes me less tolerant or patient than many on this site. If I personally lower the expectations bar, I myself will lose interest. And no, I am not an Anderson hater, but I do hold him to a high standard as I did for prior coaches and will do for future ones as well (if I’m around that long) /media/kunena/emoticons/dizzy.png Simply, I’m  tired of watching NCAA tourney games without the Johnnies in it.
While it is good to remember history and learn from it, your bringing up ghosts who are no longer here who ran the program and the school for that matter as a mom and pop establishment.  Those days are gone with new regimes place who actually have a clue and a plan.

Throw out more money at an established coach and see who would come.  Okay, who are you referring to?  And why would they leave their established program?  And let’s not forget we haven’t exactly been cheap with the past three head coaches and their staffs.  And don’t give me Pitino and you can debate it all you want but he wasn’t getting the job but surely their are others right, just lining up?  So who?

We are what we are and one thing has been proven, making the tourny one year doesn’t mean a thing here because it hasn’t been maintained.  Was that because we didn’t stay the course with those coaches that were in place that time or something else.

This program has serious problems as we all know.  We’ve watched coaches implode (Fran and Jarvis), poor hires who were probably bad hires and in the first place who were kept to long (Roberts) a coach who might have been able to sustain something but lost the drive and knew he was being shown the door (Lavin) and an icon who did not really understand all it took to do the job and left with not much to help (Mullin). And while the last search was poorly done and executed, so was the one done by UCLA and they were in a helluva lot better shape as a program than us.  They got it right apparently, here’s hoping the same.

Now we already have a program that looks like it in disarray with the comings on goings of coaches.  Anderson getting fired after last season would have added more fuel to the fire and who is coming then?  And if he left for Tulsa???  I mean really, Tulsa?

Sometimes you have to temper expectations and goals to something achievable.  I don’t think that anyone on this Board only wants to make the NCAA’s once in awhile and be a regular the NIT or is satisfied on our current state.  Most don’t repeat themselves over and over.  But you seem to want us to turn into a blue blood over night and that isn’t realistic in our current situation.  Take the next step.  For me is to finish in the top half of the conference, make some noise in both tournaments and do it again.   Build something that can be sustained and as you do those goals become bigger.  If we are changing coaches now, the same question applies, who and I will ask why.

Last thing about, Roberts because some of the hatred thrown at him bothers me.  He was a nice guy but a horrible coach who would kids to listen but not close the deal mostly because they didn’t honk he could win and get them where they wanted to go.  I get it bad coach who stayed in the job too long but feel some have made it into more than that and personal.

Sorry for the long winded post and probable typos.
I appreciate the thoughtful response D. I know you remember the good times cause we sat near each other for many a home game many years right behind the St. John's bench. Much of what you are saying makes sense but as I said, Im impatient, getting old and I would like to see a tourney run before I kick the bucket. In terms of who we would have gotten as coach instead of Anderson, who knows but the necessary effort was not made. Look, who knows if there is a coach somewhere anxious to get back to the Metro area. How many feelers were sent out? At best the last selection was rushed and I believe more time could have been taken but due to Mike Cragg's inexperience in a coaches search, we. will never know if we got the best option out there.

Anyway , I appreciate the thoughtful and CIVIL response. Too often I have found that posters with differing views can become `caustic and lunge go into attack mode. My thought is that we are all entitled to our own opinions as long as discussions are met with civility.
 
You want a good coach to keep an eye on Kyle Smith at Washington St. Was at Columbia then San Francisco before WAZZU.  3 very difficult jobs and has done well at all 3. Won 20+ 2 of last 3 at Columbia, went to San Francisco and won 20+ all 3 years laying groundwork for Todd Golden his former assistant.  Then takes worst job in Pac 12 at Washington St. And this year they go to NIT their first NCAA or NIT and 20 win season since Tony Bennett was there. Again if you look at his record nothing overwhelming but if you dig deeper he builds at very tough schools. Also he has a solid coaching tree. See below.

https://twitter.com/highmajorscoop/status/1504966770586750980?t=F1SXVsxlJ96ZaeyWIEVSLg&s=19
 
fordham96 post=464909 said:
You want a good coach to keep an eye on Kyle Smith at Washington St. Was at Columbia then San Francisco before WAZZU.  3 very difficult jobs and has done well at all 3. Won 20+ 2 of last 3 at Columbia, went to San Francisco and won 20+ all 3 years laying groundwork for Todd Golden his former assistant.  Then takes worst job in Pac 12 at Washington St. And this year they go to NIT their first NCAA or NIT and 20 win season since Tony Bennett was there. Again if you look at his record nothing overwhelming but if you dig deeper he builds at very tough schools. Also he has a solid coaching tree. See below.

https://twitter.com/highmajorscoop/status/1504966770586750980?t=F1SXVsxlJ96ZaeyWIEVSLg&s=19

From his Wiki

His coaching style has been dubbed “Nerdball”, which is a system that utilizes analytics to track and make decisions on many aspects about the team
 
Seth Davis;

“Want to play coaching dominos?

As soon as Seton Hall's season ends....

Kevin Willard to Maryland.
Shaheen Holloway to Seton Hall.

Consider it a highly educated guess.”
 
Moose post=464923 said:
fordham96 post=464909 said:
You want a good coach to keep an eye on Kyle Smith at Washington St. Was at Columbia then San Francisco before WAZZU.  3 very difficult jobs and has done well at all 3. Won 20+ 2 of last 3 at Columbia, went to San Francisco and won 20+ all 3 years laying groundwork for Todd Golden his former assistant.  Then takes worst job in Pac 12 at Washington St. And this year they go to NIT their first NCAA or NIT and 20 win season since Tony Bennett was there. Again if you look at his record nothing overwhelming but if you dig deeper he builds at very tough schools. Also he has a solid coaching tree. See below.

https://twitter.com/highmajorscoop/status/1504966770586750980?t=F1SXVsxlJ96ZaeyWIEVSLg&s=19

From his Wiki

His coaching style has been dubbed “Nerdball”, which is a system that utilizes analytics to track and make decisions on many aspects about the team
Double heart-eyes emoji
 
Looks like Mizzou has found its next coach.

@PeteThamel
·Mar 18
Sources: Cleveland State's Dennis Gates has emerged as the target in Missouri's search. A deal isn't done, and there's still administrative steps to take. But there's clear mutual interest between both parties.
 
Back
Top