...Can we make the Tournament?

Amaseinyourface" post=418501 said:
Anthony Mattia" post=418499 said:
Amaseinyourface" post=418498 said:
Anthony Mattia" post=418495 said:
Duke of Earlington" post=418485 said:
Lunardi now has us as a First Four out.  But most others have us in.  A win tonight and we will be an official tournament team in all brackets.




 
Lunardi is a moron.  He has Kansas seeded higher than Creighton.  That's unranked Kansas ahead of ranked Creighton!  Can we please seed the tournament by resume and not by name of school!

I don’t really know their two tourney resumes, but poll rankings are meaningless and tournament has come out and said before that they have moved teams up or down a seed line to avoid matchups or due to location.


 
I understand that, but stop protecting the blue bloods.  They are having a down year, penalize them for it like you would any other school.


Personal opinion, but I think the BE is way down this year. Don’t see a sure fire second weekend team.
I think all of College Hoops is "down" this year.

When's the last time we were in Mid February and Duke, NC, Kentucky, Mich St, Kansas, UCLA, Louisville, and Arizona (to name a few) were all unranked?
 
Meanwhile it looks like Mike Anderson could have a link to FOUR Tournament teams this year.  UAB is crushing it, Missouri and Arkansas are both top-third SEC teams, and then of course there's the possibility of SJU being in the dance...
 
Beast of the East" post=418467 said:
I'd just remind people who are on a euphoric high that just two years ago, Mullin's senior laden team was 8-5 after 13 games and we were talking about 2nd place in the big east and a deep dive into the tournament.   Things can change quickly, so I'd say enjoy what's in front of us now, root like hell, and take it one game at a time.   These guys have already proven a lot, and the tournament is the goal at this point, but I've always tried to control the highs because around our programs.  The lows are never far away.   I'm optimistic though.
Man, as much as I enjoyed that season and rooting for those kids, it always felt like a collection of disjointed parts. A ton of talent seperately, but not always a full team effort. We also really lacked depth and size that year. 

Also just a correction Beast. After 13 games we were 7-6, and then split the next two to end up 8-7. From there was when the talk started of being at the top of the conference, but then we immediately lost 3 straight, two of those to Xavier and one to DePaul. I remember we all know the Xavier matchup was a bad one for us due to their size. 
 
Beast - I agree with what you're saying, though since that team was senior laden and Mullin's 4th year (without a strong incoming class) it felt more stressful. It really felt like we needed to perform well or we'd be in for another rebuild, which is exactly what happened. I do agree though about not being too high on this team as things can change quickly, but this time it feels more like playing with house money. 
 
Last edited:
Room112" post=418514 said:
Beast of the East" post=418467 said:
I'd just remind people who are on a euphoric high that just two years ago, Mullin's senior laden team was 8-5 after 13 games and we were talking about 2nd place in the big east and a deep dive into the tournament.   Things can change quickly, so I'd say enjoy what's in front of us now, root like hell, and take it one game at a time.   These guys have already proven a lot, and the tournament is the goal at this point, but I've always tried to control the highs because around our programs.  The lows are never far away.   I'm optimistic though.
Man, as much as I enjoyed that season and rooting for those kids, it always felt like a collection of disjointed parts. A ton of talent seperately, but not always a full team effort. We also really lacked depth and size that year. 

Also just a correction Beast. After 13 games we were 7-6, and then split the next two to end up 8-7. From there was when the talk started of being at the top of the conference, but then we immediately lost 3 straight, two of those to Xavier and one to DePaul. I remember we all know the Xavier matchup was a bad one for us due to their size. 
Thanks for the correction.   I didn't check and should have, but if I remember, we fought our way back to 7-6 and had a shot at second place.   We basically folded down the streth.   We also got embarrassed by Marquette in the BET for like 30 points.
 
Paultzman" post=418350 said:
mm52" post=418347 said:
I think all conference tournaments shoud be cancelled.  and just let the NCAA committee choose the field of 68 based on league play.
Time frame between conference tourneys and "Big Dance" are absurdly short and rife with risk of disruption imo.
 
Besides minimizing safety issues, it would give teams time to finish their conference schedules.
 
Beast of the East" post=418517 said:
Room112" post=418514 said:
Beast of the East" post=418467 said:
I'd just remind people who are on a euphoric high that just two years ago, Mullin's senior laden team was 8-5 after 13 games and we were talking about 2nd place in the big east and a deep dive into the tournament.   Things can change quickly, so I'd say enjoy what's in front of us now, root like hell, and take it one game at a time.   These guys have already proven a lot, and the tournament is the goal at this point, but I've always tried to control the highs because around our programs.  The lows are never far away.   I'm optimistic though.
Man, as much as I enjoyed that season and rooting for those kids, it always felt like a collection of disjointed parts. A ton of talent seperately, but not always a full team effort. We also really lacked depth and size that year. 

Also just a correction Beast. After 13 games we were 7-6, and then split the next two to end up 8-7. From there was when the talk started of being at the top of the conference, but then we immediately lost 3 straight, two of those to Xavier and one to DePaul. I remember we all know the Xavier matchup was a bad one for us due to their size. 
Thanks for the correction.   I didn't check and should have, but if I remember, we fought our way back to 7-6 and had a shot at second place.   We basically folded down the streth.   We also got embarrassed by Marquette in the BET for like 30 points.
I was very thankful Mullin got us back into the winning column in the Big East Tournament, after I believe Lavin only won one game (his first, against Rutgers). 

But man, we had some inexcusable losses. 

2017: Beat Georgetown by 1, then lost to Villanova by 41

2018: Beat Georgetown by 11, then lost to Xavier by 28

2019: Beat Depaul by 8, then lost to Marquette by 32

Yes, I know the quick turnaround, back to back games etc. But those loss margins are inexcusable and speak to a team totally unprepared. 
 
lawmanfan" post=418509 said:
Meanwhile it looks like Mike Anderson could have a link to FOUR Tournament teams this year.  UAB is crushing it, Missouri and Arkansas are both top-third SEC teams, and then of course there's the possibility of SJU being in the dance...



The winter of Mike.
 
 
bamafan" post=418547 said:
lawmanfan" post=418509 said:
Meanwhile it looks like Mike Anderson could have a link to FOUR Tournament teams this year.  UAB is crushing it, Missouri and Arkansas are both top-third SEC teams, and then of course there's the possibility of SJU being in the dance...



The winter of Mike.

 
And you can bet your life the committee would want to find a way to match St. John's and Arkansas if feasible, but then deny that it was intentional.
 
Nothing has changed.  The prescription remains winning 3 more games (assuming we have 5 left and no UConn rematch) and then at least one in the BET.  Fail to win 3 more games and it becomes winning a minimum of 2 in the BET. 

Of course some of it depends on which 2 or 3 we win (obviously beating Nova, Seton Hall and X goes farther than beating Providence and DePaul, but the latter two are now must-wins and we probably need to find a third).
 
We were a first 4 in before last nights game, we are now probably a first 4 out.  Beat Xavier and we are right back in the field of 68.
 
I agree we were bubble team before, we are a bubble team now. The next 3 weeks will decide which side if the bubble we are on.
 
St. John’s Red Storm
NET: 70, Resume: 65.0, Quality: 64.0
Q1: 2-5 | Q2: 2-2 | Q3: 5-1 | Q4: 4-0St. John’s has been trending in the right direction lately and a six-game winning streak plugged it into the bubble watch. The Red Storm followed that up with an overtime Q2 loss on the road to Butler, though, and that puts them once again with a fair amount of work left. The win over Villanova (NET 11) is certainly great, but there’s not a whole lot else on the resume. The Red Storm have mostly avoided bad losses but their second-best win is over another bubble team (UConn) and they are just 4-7 in Q1+2 games. It also doesn’t help that they rank sub-55 in every single team sheet metric. Due to their baseline of an excellent win and only one “bad” loss, though, they can still make a run. Four of SJU’s next five scheduled games (subject to change) are all at home with the lone road game coming against Villanova. I hesitate to name a record that they need to go in those games because they could still add a couple of games to their schedule, but taking two of three against Xavier, Villanova and Seton Hall over those five would be huge.

Rest of conference on link;
https://heatcheckcbb.com/ncaa-tournament-bubble-watch-2021-what-will-it-take-to-dance/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Based on my view of the strength of the teams, I thought a split with Butler was in order.  Now that we did not get that, a split with Xavier and Seton Hall are paramount; can't count on wins against Nova and UConn (if scheduled).  DePaul, at home, is likely winnable, but I've been to DePaul at CA where they came in and won.  Same with PC. 

Let's just hope for being around .500 in BE regular season play. That'd be a successful season in my book.
 
Last edited:
The post from Paultz says we can still add some games. I assume that means OOC? Are we trying to do that?
 
We are maxed out on OOC games as far as I am aware. Only game we could add is UCONN which is probably best left alone at this point. Win 3 of last 5 and a game in BE tourney and we are solidly on the bubble imho. Win 4 remaining home games (Xavier, Depaul, PC & Hall) and we are in. 
 
They'll count us out, then we'll just have to win the BET.
 
How is Rutgers position any better than ours? Two good wins. 2-5 against top Big 10 teams. If anything it's worse because they have a really bad loss to MSU.

If it ended today I could see the NCAA doing SJU-Rutgers play in game. 
 
Last edited:
gman" post=419157 said:
How is Rutgers position any better than ours? Two good wins. 2-5 against top Big 10 teams. If anything it's worse because they have a really bad loss to MSU.

If it ended today I could see the NCAA doing SJU-Rutgers play in game. 
The Big Ten has (or did recently) something like 7 or 8 teams ranked in the top 50.  Almost no amount of losing in that conference is going to hurt you too much, and wins will jump your rankings significantly. 

It is far and away the best league this year, which is probably why no one is going to come out of there with a great record (I could also see all of those tough games taking a toll on their teams come tournament time).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top