redfan25976l
Member
Just looked at Net Rankings...1 of 11 big east teams are quad1.....8 of 14 big 10 teams are quad one....ARE YOU KIDDING....its a shame and a crime...
johnny redman" post=418056 said:Just looked at Net Rankings...1 of 11 big east teams are quad1.....8 of 14 big 10 teams are quad one....ARE YOU KIDDING....its a shame and a crime...
scam
This is the first time they've played in many years where neither team was ranked. While it's unusual to be totally unimpressed by Duke v Unc, this year it was somewhat expected.MCNPA" post=418011 said:Just watched Duke va UNC. Totally unimpressed. This is the best year for us to make a run at the tourney. These teams are far from their old glory. Let's keep rolling and make a run!
You are correct. Most bubble teams have fairly weak resumes. That's what puts them on the bubble. We will have to see how things turn out, but I suspect that more Q1 and definately Q2 wins are out there since its easier to win road games without fans.Adam" post=418076 said:weathermannyc - I mostly agree. One thing to keep in mind about our 2019 resume is that our NET (#72) was really bad. We actually had the worst NET (previously RPI) of any at-large Tournament team in history. The only reason we were selected was because of our strong Q1 wins. Without them we never would've been close to the bubble. Our NET this year is better than it was then, so we won't need nearly as many Q1 wins. Generally bubble teams only have 1-2 Q1 wins, so I think we're doing a fine job there. Could always do better, though, and we will have at least 1 more chance to get one. Mostly we just need to keep winning and improving our NET, I'm not concerned about our Q1 resume.
Agree. Yesterday was a potential trap game. So is Butler on Tuesday. (It'll be the first time we face a team that we've already beaten) I was most impressed with the response after blowing a 17 point lead to find ourselves down 5 with PC dictating style of play. I thought the game was over and we had blown a golden opportunity. But, we battled back and answered with a 20-3 run that basically served as a knockout punch. We have developed the ability to put an impressive game changing run on anyone. Sometimes we do it more than once per game. We also seem to give up one of these per game. Maybe its a function of our style of play and its natural ebb and flow. But, if we ever figure out how to hold the other teams run to 10-2 instead of allowing 18-4 or something...espken" post=418091 said:Listening to all pre and postgame interviews, CMA seems to have all the players locked-in, staying humble. This group is hungry. Yesterdays game was a huge mental test coming off the upset of Villanova. Not worried at all about perceived brackets, they will let their play decide their fate.
I think 4-2 is very doable. It's possible Johnnies will be favored in all the remaining games except the Villanova road game.lawmanfan" post=418292 said:Degree of difficulty of the remaining games, ranked easiest to hardest to win:
DePaul
@Butler
Providence
Xavier
@Nova
Seton Hall
IMO the most likely outcome is 3-3, which would be 16-10, 10-9, probably 5th in the league depending on what UConn does (they have 2 v Georgetown, 2 v Providence, at X, at Nova, Marq, at the Hall left - my guess is they finish either 9-10 or 10-9 and we have the tiebreaker).
Considering that the ACC is looking like a 6 or 7 bid league as opposed to a 9 bid league, I think the Big East will get either 5 or 6 teams into the NCAA tournament.
Winning a couple of games in the BET would seal the deal.
espken" post=418091 said:Listening to all pre and postgame interviews, CMA seems to have all the players locked-in, staying humble. This group is hungry. Yesterdays game was a huge mental test coming off the upset of Villanova. Not worried at all about perceived brackets, they will let their play decide their fate.
And we all want the Red Storm in the NCAA "big dance" but after two decades of crap would it be so bad if we "only" make the NITs?
Just make a damn tournament - preferably the 64 team variety.