@Title_BU: The Big East has passed the Pac 12 and is now the 3rd-rated conference in the country.http://t.co/aLqPamR4tB
1. Big 12
2. Big 10
3. Big East
4. PAC 12
5. ACC
6. SEC
7. AAC
8. A10
9. WCC
10. MWC
Boom!
I'm confused. The AAC appears to have five teams ranked in the top 20, no? How can they be ranked 7th, and ahead of the Big East, with 2 ranked teams?
Question: If we lose and Georgetown wins, where do we finish in the Big East? Do we have to play in on Wednesday if we finish as the 7 seed?
because the AAC also has Rutgers, USF, UCF and Temple who are absolutely terrible. Houston is pretty bad too. Outside of the top 5 teams that conference has nobody while we have 7 out of 10 teams fighting for an NCAA birth
Read somewhere that in almost 50 chances this year, a team in the bottom 5 of the AAC, has beaten a team in the top 5 only 4 times.
Thnk about that. It helps the top wrt ncaa tournament selections, because there are no bad losses there.
FWIW there's only 7 such instances in the BE. That is, bad losses to RPI 100+ teams in conference by teams in the top 100. Yes that's 75% more so in one hour I'd have traveled 30 more miles but it's still just 3 games. Just saying you also don't get bad losses when you don't play bad teams which is how it works in the BE.
The AAC advantage is you rack up artificial win totals. 10 wins guaranteed. Doesn't happen in BE which is why win totals as the barometer for getting into the dance is not all it's cracked up to be. Also makes me wonder if the AAC to p5 aren't a bit overrated, ranking or not.
BE's top 5 also have one more OOC win vs. the top 25 RPI than AAC. Including X over Cincy in the only head to head upset. That counts for something . . . maybe or not.