STJ11Redmen
Active member
Played Syracuse and Wisconsin Neutral site.
Two power conference teams g-tech and penn state and a good mid major bucknell.
Your a joke
Bucknell is not a good mid-major.
Played Syracuse and Wisconsin Neutral site.
Two power conference teams g-tech and penn state and a good mid major bucknell.
Your a joke
For a win in the BET, that should be factored as a “home” game for SJU, no home court advantage when all the schools get allocated the same number of seats.
People being stuck thinking 3 more wins gets us somewhere are only setting themselves up for disappointment.
Played Syracuse and Wisconsin Neutral site.
Two power conference teams g-tech and penn state and a good mid major bucknell.
Your a joke
2/5 victories out of the weakest teams there.
Save your joke comments. We played all of those teams without any gameplan whatsoever.
Why Wagner? Why San Fran? Lavin's strategy was to hope these teams would win their conference and thus give us an RPI boost.
We played Darthmouth in January. In January, Georgetown played Michigan State on our home court. Huge difference.
Facts are facts. We have a good SOS but there are bubble teams out there with more quality wins than us. That is ultimately what will count.
People being stuck thinking 3 more wins gets us somewhere are only setting themselves up for disappointment.
Our lack of Top 50 wins will be our demise.
The OOC schedule was Lavin's "smartest man in the room" strategy and it will end up burning us.
We played the first half of the season without any game planning whatsoever and it showed in all of the close losses and moral victories.
Disgusting.
Our lack of Top 50 wins will be our demise.
The OOC schedule was Lavin's "smartest man in the room" strategy and it will end up burning us.
We played the first half of the season without any game planning whatsoever and it showed in all of the close losses and moral victories.
Disgusting.
Our sos is 31. You are barking up he wrong tree. We had plenty of chances to bolster a resume and didn't but it wasn't for lack of chances.
Our lack of Top 50 wins will be our demise.
The OOC schedule was Lavin's "smartest man in the room" strategy and it will end up burning us.
We played the first half of the season without any game planning whatsoever and it showed in all of the close losses and moral victories.
Disgusting.
Our sos is 31. You are barking up he wrong tree. We had plenty of chances to bolster a resume and didn't but it wasn't for lack of chances.
Our lack of Top 50 wins will be our demise.
The OOC schedule was Lavin's "smartest man in the room" strategy and it will end up burning us.
We played the first half of the season without any game planning whatsoever and it showed in all of the close losses and moral victories.
Disgusting.
People being stuck thinking 3 more wins gets us somewhere are only setting themselves up for disappointment.
Played Syracuse and Wisconsin Neutral site.
Two power conference teams g-tech and penn state and a good mid major bucknell.
Your a joke
2/5 victories out of the weakest teams there.
Save your joke comments. We played all of those teams without any gameplan whatsoever.
Why Wagner? Why San Fran? Lavin's strategy was to hope these teams would win their conference and thus give us an RPI boost.
We played Darthmouth in January. In January, Georgetown played Michigan State on our home court. Huge difference.
Facts are facts. We have a good SOS but there are bubble teams out there with more quality wins than us. That is ultimately what will count.
People being stuck thinking 3 more wins gets us somewhere are only setting themselves up for disappointment.
Who we played is not the problem; how we played is.
There is no such thing as play in games anymore guys, no matter what you choose to believe if they are part of the field of 68 they are in the dance.
Does anyone know who has the better track record in predicting the field: Lunardi or Jerry Palm at CBS? Even when Lunardi had us in, Palm had us out:
"It looks like St. John's will have to make their at-large case in the Big East tournament. A home loss to Xavier puts their at-large hopes in serious danger, and games left with DePaul and Marquette don't help them much."
If I'm not mistaken 5 wins means winning our remaining games and the BE tourney. So you are wrong we don't need 5. If we get 3 winning the BE tourney, we can loose our next 2 games.People being stuck thinking 3 more wins gets us somewhere are only setting themselves up for disappointment.
I think we need five.
per realtimerpi.com
RPI: 62 SOS: 31
People being stuck thinking 3 more wins gets us somewhere are only setting themselves up for disappointment.
I think we need five.
If I'm not mistaken 5 wins means winning our remaining games and the BE tourney. So you are wrong we don't need 5. If we get 3 winning the BE tourney, we can loose our next 2 games.People being stuck thinking 3 more wins gets us somewhere are only setting themselves up for disappointment.
I think we need five.