MakingPlays
Well-known member
Uh oh. I may have spoke to soon. When I was writing that last post, they were down 11 with like 4 minutes to go. Only down 1 right now. Nova needs this one.
Only one year at Fordham, a place that never wins and only had 7 combined conference wins the 3 prior years. I think the 8-10 is impressive in its own right. Don’t know if it means he’s gonna be a good coach but definitely doesn’t mean he can’t be one either IMO. But of course I tend to agree that the anointment was rushed, and keeping it within the family no matter what is a silly move.The way they are looking NIT would be a stretch. Neptune is not looking like a good Jay Wright replacement so far.
My general thought is if a coach doesn't dominate in a mid-major/low major conference there's no way they can compete in high major conference. Kyle Neptune, went 8-10 in the Atlantic 10 last year. If you're a really good coach, if you have half-way decent players, you at least finish .500 in that conference, and make the NIT or CIT or something. You're only playing against 2-3 tournament caliber teams in all of conference play.
It doesn't matter if it's 1 year, typically if you're an elite level coach, which you should be if you're the Nova head coach, just coaching ability alone in a mid-major conference you at least have a winning record, just by going .500 in conference and beating up on enough low majors in the non-conference. Look at Pitino at Iona he can get 20 wins in the MAAC in his sleep.Only one year at Fordham, a place that never wins and only had 7 combined conference wins the 3 prior years. I think the 8-10 is impressive in its own right. Don’t know if it means he’s gonna be a good coach but definitely doesn’t mean he can’t be one either IMO. But of course I tend to agree that the anointment was rushed, and keeping it within the family no matter what is a silly move.
I mean he took over a team that won 7 conference games the last 3 years. Combined. I know you know college ball. The MAAC is not the A10 and Fordham and Iona are two different animals completely. Iona was winning the conference before Pitino took over. Fordham was Fordham.It doesn't matter if it's 1 year, typically if you're an elite level coach, which you should be if you're the Nova head coach, just coaching ability alone in a mid-major conference you at least have a winning record, just by going .500 in conference and beating up on enough low majors in the non-conference. Look at Pitino at Iona he can get 20 wins in the MAAC in his sleep.
Look at some teams Neptune lost to last year, Manhattan, Maryland-Eastern Shore, St. Joes, UMass. These are really bad teams, that on paper, do not have more talent than Fordham. If he would have won 20 games, I would be with you that would be good at Fordham, but 16-16, to take over the Nova job... meh.
Fordham has been a doormat for decadesThe way they are looking NIT would be a stretch. Neptune is not looking like a good Jay Wright replacement so far.
My general thought is if a coach doesn't dominate in a mid-major/low major conference there's no way they can compete in high major conference. Kyle Neptune, went 8-10 in the Atlantic 10 last year. If you're a really good coach, if you have half-way decent players, you at least finish .500 in that conference, and make the NIT or CIT or something. You're only playing against 2-3 tournament caliber teams in all of conference play.
You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. If you are some random up and coming coach who's first high major opportunity will likely come at DePaul, Vanderbilt, Boston College, or some school like that, then yea 16-16 is a good job at Fordham. If you're taking over a program like Villanova, one of the winningest programs in the past 20 years, you want an elite level coach that dominated the lower level. 8-10 is not dominating.I mean he took over a team that won 7 conference games the last 3 years. Combined. I know you know college ball. The MAAC is not the A10 and Fordham and Iona are two different animals completely. Iona was winning the conference before Pitino took over. Fordham was Fordham.
I don't care if Fordham hasn't won a game in 100 years. This Nova team doesn't look good under Neptune. I've watched them play 3 times now. I'd rank them in the bottom 4 in the BE right now.Fordham has been a doormat for decades
And I don't care what he's doing at Nova my response was to what you had to say about what he did at Fordham.I don't care if Fordham hasn't won a game in 100 years. This Nova team doesn't look good under Neptune. I've watched them play 3 times now. I'd rank them in the bottom 4 in the BE right now.
Well, you're in the wrong thread then. The title of this thread is "Around the Big East."And I don't care what he's doing at Nova my response was to what you had to say about what he did at Fordham.
Lot of Kyle Neptune fans online tonight. Me personally I'm not impressed, I'm not going to talk anymore about him.
Back on topic, rough night for BE, DePaul losses as well. Finished the Gavitt Games 2-6.
They didn’t hire him because they thought he was the best coach right now. They hired him because they thought he could be. That’s where I agree with you that it’s a dumb hire. As is often the case when making a legacy/family hire.You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. If you are some random up and coming coach who's first high major opportunity will likely come at DePaul, Vanderbilt, Boston College, or some school like that, then yea 16-16 is a good job at Fordham. If you're taking over a program like Villanova, one of the winningest programs in the past 20 years, you want an elite level coach that dominated the lower level. 8-10 is not dominating.
And let's throw out anything at Fordham, This same roster Neptune has right now at Nova, Jay Wright would have them ranked in the top 10 and undefeated right now, this roster has several players from a final 4 roster and brought in a top 20 recruiting class and he lost to Temple and struggled to beat Delaware State at home... Delaware State was 2-22 last year. Nova's walk-on's are typically better than the players on Delaware State, that's not elite level coaching.
Only one year at Fordham, a place that never wins and only had 7 combined conference wins the 3 prior years. I think the 8-10 is impressive in its own right. Don’t know if it means he’s gonna be a good coach but definitely doesn’t mean he can’t be one either IMO. But of course I tend to agree that the anointment was rushed, and keeping it within the family no matter what is a silly move.
UConn, X, Creighton seem best bets to dance w remaining one or maybe two a crap shoot. Those three have a ton of size. To me Creighton stands above all BE, but w injuries you never know. If they avoid injuries of consequence Creighton has final 8 potential.