[quote="SJU61982" post=354600][quote="Moose" post=354597][quote="SJU61982" post=354594][quote="oldschool Redmen" post=354583][quote="oldschool Redmen" post=354379][quote="SJU61982" post=354371][quote="Delaware" post=354370]And the Red Sux lost at home again last night! Let's get 3 of 4 from the Rays.[/quote]
Even a split would be OK, since we only have two games left with the Rays after this week, but 3 out of 4 should be the minimum goal.[/quote]
Asplit at home is never ok.
Lets bury tb is sweep them, but 3 of 4 is ok.
We'll take the first step 3, then the genius will rest 3 regs and use the b tesm pen guys and lose thursday.[/quote]
Got that 3 of 4. TB was getting all happy, thinking ok we got that 8.5 game deficit down to 5, now it's doable.
Lol Then we decide to get serious and take the next 3.
Smackkkkkk back to 8.
Know your role TB, and never think you'll catch us again.[/quote]
Although he has not been great for us, acquiring Edwin Encarnacion, just to stop Tampa from getting him, has worked out, in that regard.
Watching these 11 games against the Yankees over this past month (all of a sudden, I'm not too upset that we only play them 2 more games the rest of the season), it's pretty clear that they are lacking at least one power bat. I know what D'Arnould did the other night, but it was just one game. They have no one who strikes fear in you (although Meadows is a very good player), and no one who could keep the team afloat by carrying them during a 2 week slump.
I generally don't like the mindset of moves like the Encarnacion one, but in this case, mission accomplished, so far.[/quote]
What can you NOT like about acquiring a power hitting bat like Edwin who will be a FA after the year for next to nothing?[/quote]
Oh, I had no problem with the trade. I just didn't like when they said that a big reason for it, was to keep him away from Tampa. That should be a bonus. The Yankees did that with Jose Canseco in 2000, and it was a disaster. Also, when they signed the reliever Mike Myers, they said it was because he could get David Ortiz out. Well, what about the rest of the league?[/quote]
How was Canseco a disaster, it did not costs them anything but the waiver claim and his salary the rest of the season. He hit a few homeruns (including at least one to win a game) and had a few hits. We won the World Series that year.
As far as Myers, he was the designated LOOGY and for the most part did his job (although he struggled down the stretch his first year). His overall stats were not bad at but he was pretty bad during a stretch that first year.
Even a split would be OK, since we only have two games left with the Rays after this week, but 3 out of 4 should be the minimum goal.[/quote]
Asplit at home is never ok.
Lets bury tb is sweep them, but 3 of 4 is ok.
We'll take the first step 3, then the genius will rest 3 regs and use the b tesm pen guys and lose thursday.[/quote]
Got that 3 of 4. TB was getting all happy, thinking ok we got that 8.5 game deficit down to 5, now it's doable.
Lol Then we decide to get serious and take the next 3.
Smackkkkkk back to 8.
Know your role TB, and never think you'll catch us again.[/quote]
Although he has not been great for us, acquiring Edwin Encarnacion, just to stop Tampa from getting him, has worked out, in that regard.
Watching these 11 games against the Yankees over this past month (all of a sudden, I'm not too upset that we only play them 2 more games the rest of the season), it's pretty clear that they are lacking at least one power bat. I know what D'Arnould did the other night, but it was just one game. They have no one who strikes fear in you (although Meadows is a very good player), and no one who could keep the team afloat by carrying them during a 2 week slump.
I generally don't like the mindset of moves like the Encarnacion one, but in this case, mission accomplished, so far.[/quote]
What can you NOT like about acquiring a power hitting bat like Edwin who will be a FA after the year for next to nothing?[/quote]
Oh, I had no problem with the trade. I just didn't like when they said that a big reason for it, was to keep him away from Tampa. That should be a bonus. The Yankees did that with Jose Canseco in 2000, and it was a disaster. Also, when they signed the reliever Mike Myers, they said it was because he could get David Ortiz out. Well, what about the rest of the league?[/quote]
How was Canseco a disaster, it did not costs them anything but the waiver claim and his salary the rest of the season. He hit a few homeruns (including at least one to win a game) and had a few hits. We won the World Series that year.
As far as Myers, he was the designated LOOGY and for the most part did his job (although he struggled down the stretch his first year). His overall stats were not bad at but he was pretty bad during a stretch that first year.