Curbelo too has showed the propensity to make big plays late. Also the potential to have the bad play late of course.
True.
I was thinking about the 3 spot and the more I do the more I think it’s best for Storr and the team if he got the nod. Playing with those other 4 might take some pressure off him to feel like he has to score. And in my opinion he’ll be the best hope for a catch and shoot guy on the wing.
If I am Anderson facing a key year, I say screw tradition and “moral high ground” nonsense to take a player capable of making this team a potential Dance participant. When things like rules change, adapt or perish seems equation.
Of course that will suck if/when that happens. But it’s not gonna not happen just because we don’t try to do the same. No sense getting screwed on both ends.
I see where you are coming from given the circumstance that Anderson is faced with but I also remember how most on this and other sites crucified Williard for doing the same in trying to retain his job at The Hall. Selfishly, as a Johnny fan I'm happy but I still believe the move is bad for the league and college hoops in general.
Whether something wrong was done here or not, it's still not a great look.
I agree. But Imagine how shittier of a look it would be if he chose seton hall instead.
Can't disagree with that.
Its kind of like a diabetic saying "Its my birthday, I'm going to eat all the cake I can, and worry about the consequences later. As long as I get the biggest piece, I'm good."
I've never been one to worry much about the morals of this sort of thing, but I do get your point about the ongoing hypocrisy of many of our posters. Just play by the rules, which we've been doing probably to a fault. In any event, a huge pick up and another solid piece to what I fully expect will be a tourney team next season. Let's keep the mo going and pick up a shooter now!
As I said in the transfer thread, I’d rather have the good players stay in the Big East than go elsewhere. The Posh example would sting but it is what it is.
