:silly:
This recruitment as I understand it is all about the staff doing the due diligence they should. If there is even a remote possibility of someone leaving, for whatever reason, the staff should have multiple backup plans. That was a big part of the undoing of the prior regime.
This may be a little more than due diligence. They may know that a particular player has other aspirations. Otherwise they could not guarantee a mid year all conference starter like this kid a possible starting job. If you had to clone one of our too current starting guards, this kid is him. That said, I don't like players that have been disruptive at their previous school.
Hopefully Matt and company are doing appropriate research and staying on top of the recruitment process better than the previous staff.