And that's what Pat was asking as well, I totally get it. It's like the Drissa situation, kid obviously wants to play. So as far as what's in it for the kid? Don't know truthfully, likelihood of playing time is near zero so...St John's degree?
Maybe we’re saving some money for the trade deadline.
Agree - what Paultzman proposed is underwhelming and if we want to win BIG like Pitino stated in his opening presser got to do better than Cliffy and his runts 
Are you not counting clayton in your players if you say nobody moves the needle?
Maybe we’re saving some money for the trade deadline.
I never saw him play, but there are some red flags in his stats. Only a one-year starter at lower level D1. While he shot 43% this year, he shot 29%, 23% and 18% in previous years. He was not a high-volume shooter from 3 this year. 2.1 attempts per game, made less than 1 per game. In such a small sample size (25 for 58), just a few more missed shots here or there would dramatically affect his 3pt%. It's like batting averages in baseball at the beginning of the season.
I agree with whoever it was that posted cliff and clayton and then whoever from that point on. I am very intrigued and interested in dubar though so I hope he is here as well.
looks good
There has been some chatter on him. I sure hope so.
you have to recognize by now your posts are dissected here like a Biology class...
To be clear, not suggesting anything, just in a “what if” mood. I do think the next two additions are likely Cliff and a hard to come by PG and maybe the exercise is more reasonable then. No more “Paultz moods”
Which I failed in high school, dissecting the frog took me a month
Agree Clayton and Cliff would "move the needle" for me. and Dubar would be a very nice additional piece.
Actually I did understand that Paultzie was just throwing that proposal out there to see if it would be enough to satisfy us fanatics but can understand why he felt the need to clarify. Cliff would be a great start but IMO we would still need one other high impact transfer to allow us to make a big jump with a chance to win big. Clayton or another high scoring player otherwise we are relying on guys like Wilcher, Luis and to lesser extent Zuby and Dunlap to not only make a jump but a big jump. I would like someone that has already established himself as an impact player.
I would feel underwhelmed. So far, despite what Marallac says, no guard mentioned except an unlikely Clayton comes anywhere near to replace Danis Jenkins. As of now we have no proven back court. Everyone keeps counting on Wilcher but Wilcher has only shown glimpses, and that was rare. We need to bring in two high powered back court guys with Cliff and an improved Luis if we have any hope of breaking into the top three in the conference. Cliff alone won’t move the needle nor will mediocre mid major talent.
