SJU Portal Targets

Status
Not open for further replies.
Everyone does. They didn’t get enough looks.
Dingle got enough looks early on, but excelled once he limited his 3 point shooting and went to the mid-range game. At times, it was hard to see how he was the second leading scorer in the country. If he comes back, the midrange game is what I would like to see him emphasize. Brady, he had limited pt except in a few games. Shot looks a little funky but he showed flashes. Think with more minutes, his consistency would hopefully better.
 
Dingle got enough looks early on, but excelled once he limited his 3 point shooting and went to the mid-range game. At times, it was hard to see how he was the second leading scorer in the country. If he comes back, the midrange game is what I would like to see him emphasize. Brady, he had limited pt except in a few games. Shot looks a little funky but he showed flashes. Think with more minutes, his consistency would hopefully better.
We will have to agree to disagree. I think he was a victim of really bad chemistry and conflicting styles. At the end he resigned himself to getting his own shot just like Alleyne. He got next to no screens from Joel and he got no setups from Jenkins.

I think we would see a completely different player next season if he came back and played with Smith. My 2 cents, but goddamn am I confident on that.
 
Just gobbled together a funky, suspect, 'stat'. Scott, Richmond, and Smith scored an aggregate 40ppg last season and generated 14 apg--which, at minimum = 28 ppg, or 68 ppg that those three guys scored / generated on good, but not great, teams.

Guessing those totals 'might' rise in Rick's fast-paced game.

O-T, but bored waiting for some 'good' portal news. Hope we get Mitchell, or Ledlum.
 
The 1 bright spot of this sju portal thread is even no matter how many side threads get spun off this thread is steamrolling to 350 pages for Sir Eric whether we get a last recruit this week or not

Somewhere he is shedding a tear of joy and Pryor to Arkansas and maybe Mitchell to us maybe even 375 if Mitchell takes a week or 2 to commit
You still buyin at Novita?
 
Because it is relevant to Mitchell and really anyone we get, a good point guard gets good shots for guys. That doesn’t mean he makes bad shooters good shooters. Mitchell is not going to become a good shooter because Smith and Richmond are good passers. Will get a couple easy buckets because of them.
Mitchell might not be much of a shooter but is still quite a good scorer inside. Reminds be a bit of a slightly smaller thinner version of Trayce Jackson-Davis. Davis also doesn’t have a jumper but was always an athletic mismatch up front. I can see Mitchell playing a similar type of role.
 
Mitchell might not be much of a shooter but is still quite a good scorer inside. Reminds be a bit of a slightly smaller thinner version of Trayce Jackson-Davis. Davis also doesn’t have a jumper but was always an athletic mismatch up front. I can see Mitchell playing a similar type of role.
Is this Mitchell guy the same guy who is testing the NBA waters......without being a decent shooter? 😉
 
Dingle got enough looks early on, but excelled once he limited his 3 point shooting and went to the mid-range game. At times, it was hard to see how he was the second leading scorer in the country. If he comes back, the midrange game is what I would like to see him emphasize. Brady, he had limited pt except in a few games. Shot looks a little funky but he showed flashes. Think with more minutes, his consistency would hopefully better.
NM
 
FWIW, The Athletic ranks Dillion Mitchell the 6th best PF in the Portal, of 39 PFs ranked and #51 in the Top 200.
Oh, they rank Kasean Pryor the 13th best PF and 73rd player overall.

247Sports ranks Dillon the 6th best PF and 22nd overall.
 
I would be careful a wee bit about Smith being the second coming. I have never seen him play but was cautioned by someone who saw about 10 of his games this year that he is a good player, no question, but his stats were somewhat inflated by a terrific 4 game NIT run, particularly in 3 point shooting and assists.
Anyway, he was 10-13 from 3 which drove his % over 40. Those games certainly count obviously but in his previous 33 games shot 33%, which in itself was above his previous 3 year numbers, 28% twice being his previous highs.
Assists wise he had 38 in the 4 games, a terrific number, which drove his game average over 7; in the previous 33 games, he averaged 4.8, which was .5 an assist lower per game than Jenkins, and for Smith, a full assist a game higher than his best previous.
I realize these types of posts attempting to share a possible touch of realism regarding players very few of us have seen play are not really welcome, so please take it fwiw to you. ;)
 
I would be careful a wee bit about Smith being the second coming. I have never seen him play but was cautioned by someone who saw about 10 of his games this year that he is a good player, no question, but his stats were somewhat inflated by a terrific 4 game NIT run, particularly in 3 point shooting and assists.
Anyway, he was 10-13 from 3 which drove his % over 40. Those games certainly count obviously but in his previous 33 games shot 33%, which in itself was above his previous 3 year numbers, 28% twice being his previous highs.
Assists wise he had 38 in the 4 games, a terrific number, which drove his game average over 7; in the previous 33 games, he averaged 4.8, which was .5 an assist lower per game than Jenkins, and for Smith, a full assist a game higher than his best previous.
I realize these types of posts attempting to share a possible touch of realism regarding players very few of us have seen play are not really welcome, so please take it fwiw to you. ;)
Thanks, good counterbalance to a fan base that tends to overhype every single recruit every year (myself included).
 
Assists wise he had 38 in the 4 games, a terrific number, which drove his game average over 7; in the previous 33 games, he averaged 4.8, which was .5 an assist lower per game than Jenkins, and for Smith, a full assist a game higher than his best previous.
I realize these types of posts attempting to share a possible touch of realism regarding players very few of us have seen play are not really welcome, so please take it fwiw to you. ;)
Are you going back to include games from his previous season in that total?

Take out the NIT and Smith averaged 6.7 assists on the season.

Edit: Just looked, over his previous 33 games prior to the NIT (spans over 2 seasons) he averaged 6 assists.
 
I would be careful a wee bit about Smith being the second coming. I have never seen him play but was cautioned by someone who saw about 10 of his games this year that he is a good player, no question, but his stats were somewhat inflated by a terrific 4 game NIT run, particularly in 3 point shooting and assists.
Anyway, he was 10-13 from 3 which drove his % over 40. Those games certainly count obviously but in his previous 33 games shot 33%, which in itself was above his previous 3 year numbers, 28% twice being his previous highs.
Assists wise he had 38 in the 4 games, a terrific number, which drove his game average over 7; in the previous 33 games, he averaged 4.8, which was .5 an assist lower per game than Jenkins, and for Smith, a full assist a game higher than his best previous.
I realize these types of posts attempting to share a possible touch of realism regarding players very few of us have seen play are not really welcome, so please take it fwiw to you. ;)
It’s not about stats, it’s about his abilities. He can do things nobody on the team could last year. I couldn’t care less if he gets half the assists if his play helps whoever gets credit for the assist.

I think he’s a 25 minute guy that you bottle up and let go at certain points. He’s going to make plenty of mistakes.
 
I would be careful a wee bit about Smith being the second coming. I have never seen him play but was cautioned by someone who saw about 10 of his games this year that he is a good player, no question, but his stats were somewhat inflated by a terrific 4 game NIT run, particularly in 3 point shooting and assists.
Anyway, he was 10-13 from 3 which drove his % over 40. Those games certainly count obviously but in his previous 33 games shot 33%, which in itself was above his previous 3 year numbers, 28% twice being his previous highs.
Assists wise he had 38 in the 4 games, a terrific number, which drove his game average over 7; in the previous 33 games, he averaged 4.8, which was .5 an assist lower per game than Jenkins, and for Smith, a full assist a game higher than his best previous.
I realize these types of posts attempting to share a possible touch of realism regarding players very few of us have seen play are not really welcome, so please take it fwiw to you. ;)
So you’re saying he played his best games in the post season against legit competition?
 
I would be careful a wee bit about Smith being the second coming. I have never seen him play but was cautioned by someone who saw about 10 of his games this year that he is a good player, no question, but his stats were somewhat inflated by a terrific 4 game NIT run, particularly in 3 point shooting and assists.
Anyway, he was 10-13 from 3 which drove his % over 40. Those games certainly count obviously but in his previous 33 games shot 33%, which in itself was above his previous 3 year numbers, 28% twice being his previous highs.
Assists wise he had 38 in the 4 games, a terrific number, which drove his game average over 7; in the previous 33 games, he averaged 4.8, which was .5 an assist lower per game than Jenkins, and for Smith, a full assist a game higher than his best previous.
I realize these types of posts attempting to share a possible touch of realism regarding players very few of us have seen play are not really welcome, so please take it fwiw to you. ;)

Wait.....the math is off here. For him to lift his assist average from 4.8 to 7 in just his last four games, wouldn't he need about 25 assist per game in those four games?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top