I still think we have the talent to be a tourney team. Branch back soon and in a perfect world Sanchez as well. We need to get things together and start playing well.
Lawman, regardless of who was on the court, our energy and focus were MUCH better in the South Carolina game. I think it is archived on espn3. Look at our defense, transition ans especially motion on offense. Different team in that game.
And therefore the reason for the frustration, and the negativity. No doubt we have the talent to be a tourney team,but do we have the team to be a tourney team? It's a team game. We all look at the individual pieces: One of the best scorers in school history, the best shot blocker in school history, a candidate for Big East Rookie of the Year who will be in the NBA in a year or two. Almost all top 100 recruits. A real find in Balamou. The pieces don't yet fit. It's like a jigsaw puzzle, where you try to squeeze the thick ended piece into the thin opening. A two guard playing point. A PF playing center. And so on. Branch and Sanchez will fit perfectly, and maybe complete the puzzle. Without Sanchez, we are still missing a piece.
So, my question is for Ray M and MCN, and I'm not trying to be a jerk by asking this,
but why is it obvious that we have the talent?
Yes, we have top 100 recruits, but at what point are you considered only as good as you're playing?
Sure, Dom was the 25th ranked recruit in his class according to ESPN... but when do we stop considering him an elite talent and consider him the 5pts and 4rebounds a game player that we've seen now for a year and a half?
It's still early in the season, and I'm not writing anyone off.
But if we're not playing well (and I don't think we are lately), then there's only logically a couple reasons.
1) We simply haven't "gelled" yet, and we have good individual pieces, but poor chemistry.
2) The coaching isn't good.
3) Maybe some of our players aren't as good as we thought they were.
I agree with you both that I thought we had a lot of talent on this team. But, I'm not sure that's obvious anymore.
At best, there's hidden talent. And alternatively, there could be less talent than we thought.
And to whoever responds with, "the sky isn't falling", "don't panic", I don't think it is either, and I didn't say that.
But when do we stop measuring guys on the talent we think they have, and judge them by what they're actually doing?