beast of the east
Active member
That was a ridiculous answer by Lavin. He had a misrable day yesterday, he needs to get these guys ready to play next week.
I don't understand not starting jordan. What the heck is keady there for? Shouldn't he knock some sense into lavin?
It should be obvious what game the used car salesman was playing. Jordan had played very well the past few games and had upped his draft prospects. Lav wanted to "remind" the scouts that RJ was a "problem child" who is not ready by not starting him. Its the real reason he lost his starting spot to Branch earlier in the season and Lav figured he would still get the benefit of his production by his playing starter minutes while hurting his rep with scouts by creating the image that he is not ready or mature enough yet.
Would have been different if Branch had been killing it on the court but the fact that he wasn't, not then or now makes the whole thing highly suspicious.
Not starting Jordan was asinine. IF he did something that warranted not starting then IMO he should have been suspended a la Harrison; IF he did something to deserve the sit down, enough with the never ending soap opera. Since I have heard no explanation except for the insulting one referencing Banch's practice performance I will believe it was just another team-destructive Lavin "I am smarter than anyone else" attempt at playing a mind game.
It's asinine to comment without knowing the exact reasons he was benched. Credit to Lavin to keep the exact reason private, and not throw Jordan under the bus and perhaps hasten his exit. Jordan not starting had no impact on the final result. Although he had a nice stat line, we looked no more like a team running on all cyllinders with him in or out of the game.