(POST GAME) Providence, Tue., Feb. 1, 9p, CBSSN

ghostzapper post=454573 said:
Just back from the Arena. Very frustrating loss. I felt that we were going to lose when we screwed up the final seconds of the first half (see Seton Hall at MSG). That said, Posh was absolutely magnificent and almost carried us to victory despite the obvious deficits by the rest of the collective group.

Stat of the game by far:  Minus Posh (3 for 4) the rest of the SJU team shot 14% from the line (1 for 7)
                                        Minus Watson (6 for 11) the rest of the Providence team shot better than 95% from the line (21 for 22)
Posh was great, and always give him the benefit of the doubt given his incredible non-stop effort levels, but he also made some bonehead fouls and sloppy turnovers that killed us.
 
gman post=454580 said:
I haven’t posted much since I can’t watch the games, but on paper this seems to end out season. We really need to win the next 3 games given the killer stretch we have coming up. This should end CMAs non-losing season stretch.

I like a lot feel bad for Julian. Maybe the pressure was too much for him and seeing his NBA bubble pop can’t feel good.

I’ll keep positive and hope for a miracle run to end the season. So many of the things you guys post about seem fixable.
This is one of the most frustrating things about this season. If Champ played anywhere close to how he played last year, or even just played decently in all these games, we would probably have 3-4 more wins and be in really good shape right now. Having the person you expected to be your best player and to carry a big role on the team be consistently terrible is tough to overcome.
 
I would like to see a game where the refs call 3-second violations and don’t let the bigs muscle their way to the basket.  And call the fouls for fending with the off-ball hand.  
 
otis post=454595 said:
Mario post=454591 said:
There were many bonehead plays. Fouling with 8 seconds left on the shot clock at the end of the game was asinine, doing a pullup on the rim after a dunk.............just to name a few.



 
——-
It is what is is…… yet another disappointing season.

CMA is, by all reports is a good and decent man, but he has not distinguished himself this season with his coaching performance.  

 College basketball has changed during the past decade to a “long ball game” that emphasizes outside shooting and the 3 point shot which seemingly CMA has not adjusted to on offense or defense (see open shots of St.John’s press, etc.).  

Yep, We Certainly Are St. John’s.


.
I don't see problems with his system or, for the most part, his coaching (just about every coach will have some things that you question). The big concern is his recruiting. We just don't have a talented enough roster, especially shooters. The offense gets plenty of good looks, and our players don't hit the shots.
 
 
Couple items now that i have had a restless night sleep cause i let the Ws and Ls of college kids effect my mood... 

- CA was fun last night- good job promoting the game and getting people to attend. By the looks of it- seemed the first two tiers were full and the 3rd tier was about 50-60% full.
- I sat in sec 9, couple rows up from the Prov bench... man- did not expect that many Providence fans. Though this section was season ticket holders. I know everyone has a price.... but think there should be a 5x threshold before you sell your tickets to opposing fans... was disappointed in that.
- Seeing Providence coaches/players up close.... they have a Team. I can see why they have kept so many older players- seemed like a very family-oriented environment. Would have no problem my kid playing for Cooley- he atleast exudes a perception that he cares/listens/encourages his guys. They got a good mix of 7-8 guys who can all contribute well.  (not saying CMA doesn't- was just close to the Prov bench)
- 25k halfcourt shot.... wtf SJU.... ? this is in no way a sexist comment, but you need to put people out there that can actually get the ball to the basket.... get a pool of three... test them out in Taffner, and choose the best ones..... unless the University didnt even want the risk of someone making it... Terribly disappointing. 
- SJU.... ughhh.... this is a sad season. I'm gonna blame us and the BE coaches for ranking us 4th, picking Champ and Posh on the All-BE teams.... encouraging us fans to have actual expectations of this group... smh lol. This group is more a collection of individual talents than TEAM. Every 4/5 games, we'll click.... but most times we are tripping over ourselves. Each time we seemed to have some Momentum....we made one or a series of bonehead plays/turnovers....

 
 
All the negatives from last night about not winning a winnable game, it was a fun atmosphere last night at CA.  I enjoyed being shoulder to shoulder again with fans glued to my backless seat because concession stand and bathroom lines are long at halftime.
 
Monte post=454568 said:
I really don't get this talk about giving certain kids more PT in anticipation of them being back next season. Reality is, at this point we have no clue who will and who won't be back next season. 

To add, no coach is going to bench players trying to build for next year.  They are still trying to win now, despite their record and will put the players on the court who they feel will give them the best chance.  Only difference would be if they know for sure they have a disgruntled player who has his foot out of the door already (see Roshown Mcleod)/.
 
Mean Gene post=454532 said:
That sequence at the end of the first half when we could have scored 5 pts and instead we scored 1 and they scored 3 killed us. That and foul shooting. Providence shot 82% from the line and we were 4-11. Yes, they shot 22 more free throws then us but we took 16 more shots from the field than them. All that and even with us being so undisciplined, if we get anything near normal from Champ we probably still pull this out. 

One more little key, why didn't we face guard Durham in the last minute so they couldn't pass the ball to him?  We could have taken our chances with any body else, but 4 times they inbounded to him and he was money.
 
 
This one wasn't complicated:

1.  Too many mistakes
2.  Not enough free throws
3.  Providence did Providence things, making a bunch of big shots at critical times (some superbly defended, some not)
4.  No signs of life from Champ

Some of the mistakes were player error, some of them are attributable to CMA's approach to coaching.  But the rest isn't coaching.

One thing the game showed you is the impact of a program being in Year 10 with the same coach and returning a bunch of players who have been in that system for multiple years or came in as upperclassmen.  Watson, Reeves, Horchler, Croswell, Durham and Minaya are all seniors, Bynum is a junior, the only player who gets significant time other than those guys is Breed who's a sophomore.

When you have a well-established system and players who are long familiar with it, it dramatically improves your chances of playing the way Providence plays.

We aren't there yet.
 
Mario post=454590 said:
Monte post=454542 said:
In fairness, we didn't have Pinzon 
Does anyone know what happened to Pinzon? Is he injured?

I have no  "inside" knowledge but my original thought was waiting for cardiac clearance but don't think that is now (if it ever was) the issue and think it might be related to a knee problem that has bothered him in the past.
 
SJU85 post=454648 said:
Mario post=454590 said:
Monte post=454542 said:
In fairness, we didn't have Pinzon 
Does anyone know what happened to Pinzon? Is he injured?

I have no  "inside" knowledge but my original thought was waiting for cardiac clearance but don't think that is now (if it ever was) the issue and think it might be related to a knee problem that has bothered him in the past.
So can't they at least make a statement that he is out with a lower body injury like they do in the NHL? /media/kunena/emoticons/wink.png
 
lawmanfan post=454644 said:
This one wasn't complicated:

1.  Too many mistakes
2.  Not enough free throws
3.  Providence did Providence things, making a bunch of big shots at critical times (some superbly defended, some not)
4.  No signs of life from Champ

Some of the mistakes were player error, some of them are attributable to CMA's approach to coaching.  But the rest isn't coaching.

One thing the game showed you is the impact of a program being in Year 10 with the same coach and returning a bunch of players who have been in that system for multiple years or came in as upperclassmen.  Watson, Reeves, Horchler, Croswell, Durham and Minaya are all seniors, Bynum is a junior, the only player who gets significant time other than those guys is Breed who's a sophomore.

When you have a well-established system and players who are long familiar with it, it dramatically improves your chances of playing the way Providence plays.

We aren't there yet.
Good post and would add Cooley’s staff plays transfer game extremely well as per five of seven guys you referenced.
 
SJU's expectations were always higher than PC, it is better job.  You don't get to argue this nonsense if you did not hold previous coaches to the same standard.  This is the result of Ed Cooley being at PC for 10 years?  What?  Mike Anderson has 20 years coaching experience but he can't be judged unless he has X amount of years here.

If that is the case then you should have been arguing to KEEP Steve Lavin after just 5 years and 4 post-season appearances including 2 NCAA bids.  You don't get to conveniently say "He needs more time..." when you never accorded the same thing for others.  This is why your posts are nonsense.  You simply decide "I like this guy" so I am going to make up arguments to keep him that I could have used with Norm or Lavin but I simply chose not to use those arguments because I did not like them.

lawmanfan post=454644
This one wasn't complicated:

1.  Too many mistakes
2.  Not enough free throws
3.  Providence did Providence things, making a bunch of big shots at critical times (some superbly defended, some not)
4.  No signs of life from Champ

Some of the mistakes were player error, some of them are attributable to CMA's approach to coaching.  But the rest isn't coaching.

One thing the game showed you is the impact of a program being in Year 10 with the same coach and returning a bunch of players who have been in that system for multiple years or came in as upperclassmen.  Watson, Reeves, Horchler, Croswell, Durham and Minaya are all seniors, Bynum is a junior, the only player who gets significant time other than those guys is Breed who's a sophomore.

When you have a well-established system and players who are long familiar with it, it dramatically improves your chances of playing the way Providence plays.

We aren't there yet.
 
Last edited:
lawmanfan post=454644 said:
This one wasn't complicated:

1.  Too many mistakes
2.  Not enough free throws
3.  Providence did Providence things, making a bunch of big shots at critical times (some superbly defended, some not)
4.  No signs of life from Champ

Some of the mistakes were player error, some of them are attributable to CMA's approach to coaching.  But the rest isn't coaching.

One thing the game showed you is the impact of a program being in Year 10 with the same coach and returning a bunch of players who have been in that system for multiple years or came in as upperclassmen.  Watson, Reeves, Horchler, Croswell, Durham and Minaya are all seniors, Bynum is a junior, the only player who gets significant time other than those guys is Breed who's a sophomore.

When you have a well-established system and players who are long familiar with it, it dramatically improves your chances of playing the way Providence plays.

We aren't there yet.

You are going soft in your old age.?

The part I disagree is that we are not there yet.

Admittedly, I have no idea where ultimately there is, or if we ever get there. But I think it was fair to expect a jump in wins in year three of Anderson’s system.

Also, the defense has been bad. The pressure is out of sorts. It leads to more open three’s than turnovers.
 
Exactly.

We aren't even there yet?  What does that even mean?  That is like saying the Giants are bad because they aren't there yet?  Uh no kidding.  And your point is?

kranmars post=454660

You are going soft in your old age.?

The part I disagree is that we are not there yet.

Admittedly, I have no idea where ultimately there is, or if we ever get there. But I think it was fair to expect a jump in wins in year three of Anderson’s system.

Also, the defense has been bad. The pressure is out of sorts. It leads to more open three’s than turnovers.
 
Providence was a good opponent to judge the success or failure of this season. While there are still a good number of games to be played last nights loss appears to end the season. Prior to the season Prov and SJU were considered two teams pretty close in expectations. Today Prov is competing for a four seed and two possible NCAA wins the first weekend and SJU is finishing out another wasted season.
One reason is the two shooters brought in to provide an outside threat did not materialize but the two glaring disappointments is the potential big east player of the year could not perform as hoped and the team and coaching staff could not perform at crunch time.
Prov won close games vs Wisc, Texas Tech, Xav, Conn and SH. SJU lost to Ind, Pitt, Conn and SH in the final minute. Now it is up to Cragg to figure out what to do.  Don’t be fooled when SJU beats Vill or some other good team next week when all the pressure has been lifted. Judge it on these past games when the SJU team looks rudderless in all close game endings.
 
fordham96 post=454665 said:
Exactly.

We aren't even there yet?  What does that even mean?  That is like saying the Giants are bad because they aren't there yet?  Uh no kidding.  And your point is?

kranmars post=454660
lawmanfan post=454644 said:

You are going soft in your old age.?

The part I disagree is that we are not there yet.

Admittedly, I have no idea where ultimately there is, or if we ever get there. But I think it was fair to expect a jump in wins in year three of Anderson’s system.

Also, the defense has been bad. The pressure is out of sorts. It leads to more open three’s than turnovers.
EXACTLY! I can take the losing far easier than all the bull spit excuse making from some on this board. Even the coach and the players don't make any of these excuses.
 
Teams that historically have been bad free throw shooting teams have been freak athletic teams whose Achilles heel was their FT shooting.
The Olajuwon Hou teams
Those McRay, Griffith Louisville teams
The Fab 5
Those Flying Illini teams
Shaq’s LSU teams 
plucky undersized unathletic teams that can’t shoot threes or FT’s are destined to fail
 
Last edited:
Back
Top