Possible Coaching Candidates

I have said this all along. I do not know how Cragg/ Shanley can possibly spin his departure in a way that does not make them look completely incompetent. Anyone who thinks this doesn’t matter is kidding themselves.
I have thought Cragg to be incompetent for some time for many reasons. Shanley’s problem is, as a new president he put too much confidence in Cragg’s decision making. Cragg’s idiotic extension to Anderson and Shanley’s approval of it is the biggest example of that. Hopefully Shanley learned his lesson and doesn’t give Cragg any type of free rein on a coaching search.

In terms of whether Anderson will be let go, while the Johnnies almost pulled out the victory with three miraculous three point shots, if they had won, that would have given the brain-less trust more reason to give Anderson another chance. Again, hoping the season ends quickly and abruptly after the next game.
 
Outside of you financially don't want to pay his buyout there is no justification to keeping him unless you are ok with another year of bottom of the league performance. There is certainly no guarantee that his successor will be a savior and as this thread has shown there likely will not be many top choices. I still hope we go with Speedy as I personally believe he has a chance. All this said it wouldn't shock me if they kept CMA one more year but I don't expect it. Anyone have some coaching possibilities to post?
 
Funny though how Carnesseca was sold out all season for a team that was completely unwatchable.

I personally found yesterdays game extremely watchable. Same for our wins against UConn and Providence.

This is where I give Cragg some credit. Regardless of how it's done, he had "fannies in the seats" throughout an absolutely horrid season. There were at least two games when I wondered if I would be the only schmuck to show up. Yet, attendance was decent all year.
 
I this case, I will not adhere to the “the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t”.

We know what we have, and what we have is completely unwatchable.

Of course this school’s track record of coaching hires does not bring confidence that it will finally be done correctly.

But I am confident t

This is where I give Cragg some credit. Regardless of how it's done, he had "fannies in the seats" throughout an absolutely horrid season. There were at least two games when I wondered if I would be the only schmuck to show up. Yet, attendance was decent all year.
I agree with this totally.
 
I don't see him leaving either. His "never had a losing season" mantra is ideal for a program that thrives in mediocrity. There are no plans to become elite. The powers that be are elated with a mid-major program selling tix in a Big East Conference. It makes life easy and pressure free.
I have to disagree with you. The new President is not going to stand for his signature sport program to be mediocre at best.

As a leader, sometimes you make mistakes and have to cut your loses. This is one of those times.
 
Since the all ConEd coaching list has unsurprisingly, but deservedly, gone off the rails, I suggest we get it all out of our system over the next week or so.

From there, all our “please for the love of all that is college basketball holy” energy must be focused on hiring a top tier coach, and that still starts with Pitino.
The scary thing is my Con Ed CEO mention is better than some of the serious suggestions on this thread. I think this thread needs a 24 hour timeout :)
 
These recent posts have got me thinking that perhaps the posters on one hand and Cragg and Anderson on the other have different expectations of what constitutes a successful season. Posters are looking for a post season bid and competing with the top echelon of big east teams.
I don’t recall Anderson talking about post season play and with Cragg setting him up with easier and easier OOC schedules he achieves his better than 500 win loss record.
SJU hasn’t had much success at making post season play but the prior coaches always mentioned it as a goal.
Maybe Anderson figures it has been so long since we won a post season game it is not really expected.
 
These recent posts have got me thinking that perhaps the posters on one hand and Cragg and Anderson on the other have different expectations of what constitutes a successful season. Posters are looking for a post season bid and competing with the top echelon of big east teams.
I don’t recall Anderson talking about post season play and with Cragg setting him up with easier and easier OOC schedules he achieves his better than 500 win loss record.
SJU hasn’t had much success at making post season play but the prior coaches always mentioned it as a goal.
Maybe Anderson figures it has been so long since we won a post season game it is not really expected.
Not true GC. There was a much publicized New York Post article just before start of the season where CMA said this was the most talented team he'd had at SJU and also said they were definitely good enough to make the Dance and that was the goal.
 
Not true GC. There was a much publicized New York Post article just before start of the season where CMA said this was the most talented team he'd had at SJU and also said they were definitely good enough to make the Dance and that was the goal.
Totally agree! I believe there have been public comments made by Cragg, Shanley and Anderson that have indicated that getting the team into the Big Dance regularly was a standard they aspire to achieve. Additionally, I kind of remember, that when hired, Mike Anderson talked about building an NCAA tournament champion as something that he aspired to achieve here. If the bar has been lowered, it has been based largely by results not by stated aspirations or goals.
 
Pretty poor response unless it’s meant to be sarcasm. If you don’t want another mistake I wanna know these candidates strengths and weaknesses.
Pretty poor response unless it’s meant to be sarcasm. If you don’t want another mistake I wanna know these candidates strengths and weaknesses.
I like to refer to my posts as Mahercasm
 
These recent posts have got me thinking that perhaps the posters on one hand and Cragg and Anderson on the other have different expectations of what constitutes a successful season. Posters are looking for a post season bid and competing with the top echelon of big east teams.
I don’t recall Anderson talking about post season play and with Cragg setting him up with easier and easier OOC schedules he achieves his better than 500 win loss record.
SJU hasn’t had much success at making post season play but the prior coaches always mentioned it as a goal.
Maybe Anderson figures it has been so long since we won a post season game it is not really expected.
Go back to sleep 🤣 just kidding 😉😊
 
It’s a tough call to be sure. Replacing Anderson is riskier than many on this board seem to think. They will have to go with an “up and comer“ and that is always a crap shoot.
In order to assess risk, you have to determine what there is to lose. Care to explain what SJU has to lose if it parts way with Anderson?
 
In order to assess risk, you have to determine what there is to lose. Care to explain what SJU has to lose if it parts way with Anderson?
Everyone seems to be assuming that CMA is, to coin a phrase, "irredeemable" at this point. I'm not so sure. I am, on the other hand, 99.9% sure that his buyout will cause the admin to go with a mid-major "up and comer" whom the odds say will not ultimately materialize into a successful high-major coach - and in any event, will involve another lengthy rebuild. I'll take my chances with one more year of CMA.
 
Back
Top