Pitino

[quote="Beast of the East" post=339149][quote="Moose" post=339142]One thing I find funny here. if you look up old posts about Pitino he would routinely ripped on this site. People saying he doesn't care about SJU etc...

I always knew he had an affinity for SJU but everyone felt it wasn't genuine or whatever.

Now he publicly speaks about his affinity for SJU and everyone is drooling and changing their boxers. Pretty funny if you ask me.[/quote]

Moose, my recollection is that when Cal was at UMASS and asked Pitino about a vacant SJU position, Pitino advised that he was better off to stay at UMASS as it was a better program. He may have steered Donovan away also, but Donovan had his own beef against Lou that was not warranted.[/quote]

I can only speak to my time as a fan 2000 on. And Pitino has always spoken highly of SJU to people. He has ties to Repole and a few other donors as well.

Curious regarding Donovan rift? Wasn't his Dad on the Board or something?

* Also Cal was never coming here after his comments about Lou
 
Last edited:
I am not endorsing, or ruling Pitino out. I am trying to look at it as objectively as I can.

If Pitino was hired, I would think a lot of research and discussions have taken place (they most likely are going anyway, as part of due diligence). Many of the concerns would have to alleviated first.

I cannot see the southern district of NY apologizing, so Pitino would have to bend on that one for example.

As far as past cheating goes (and that is the issue), Pitino could go clean. Let's face it, at SJU, he is not competing against Kentucky, Duke, NC, for example.

If Pitino gets very good foundation 3-4 star players, and coaches them up (and there is no arguing his coaching abilities), and gets this program to an elite eight in 3 years, he will be a conquering hero.

And if SJU, by the grace of St. John himself, ever gets to an elite eight, higher level kids will want to come here (just ask Mike Jarvis).

That is not a stretch, because coaching players up, and preaching defense, goes a long way. Just look at this year's championship game as an example.

Again, Pitino is a high risk. There is a lot to dislike. I am torn because of it.

First, if a high level recruit comes here, the whispering of shady recruiting will certainly pop up, and cause anxiety.

Conversely, if Pitino goes to another school and makes them a consistent top 25 program, I would sink into depression.

I would hate to make that call. I would not be able to sleep for the entire season either way.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=339129][quote="IDRAFT" post=339125][quote="Knight" post=339063][quote="IDRAFT" post=339049][quote="adavis1" post=339029]If St. John's wants to win Pitino is the obvious hire. As a non-Catholic and someone who didn't go to SJU I'm interested in what in Pitino's past is keeping St. John's from hiring him. Is it the affair(s)? Donald Trump is President (with a majority of the Catholic vote). Is it the obviously dirty programs he ran? Does anybody even pretend to care about that anymore? The NCAA is obviously immoral and I assume every school cheats or turns a blind eye to it. Is Pitino a non-starter for the important people at St. John's because he paid for an abortion? I ask this with complete respect and curiosity is paying for an abortion the unforgivable sin keeping St. John's from hiring Pitino?[/quote]

The priest at my wife’s church read a ringing endorsement of Trump during a mass from the Rockville Center Diocese! But a line gets drawn here. So hypocritical.[/quote]

Endorsement of what? I am dubious of a priest reading anything political in church. What parish?[/quote]

Endorsement for President. Notre Dame New Hyde Park.[/quote]

To my knowledge, there are strict guidelines against church's endorsing candidates for political office. They have been accused of doing this over time, but often what is and can be advocated from the pulpit are voting for candidates in line with church teachings on abortion, concerns for the poor, etc. Sometimes those in pews have to connect the dots, as in a statement like this: "There may be no greater issue than protecting the killing of innocent unborn children. With election day approaching, there are clear choices on this subject."

Saying vote for Trump or any candidate could jeopardize tax free status of churches.[/quote]

I think OP may be referring to in the months before the election, the bishop of RVC wrote a letter saying essentially to vote for the candidate who is against abortion and priests were directed to share this message. Obviously it wasn't as blunt as referring to abortion, but if you could read the tea leaves of the homily, etc. you would get the message.
 
[quote="kranmars" post=339153]I am not endorsing, or ruling Pitino out. I am trying to look at it as objectively as I can.

If Pitino was hired, I would think a lot of research and discussions have taken place (they most likely are going anyway, as part of due diligence). Many of the concerns would have to alleviated first.

I cannot see the southern district of NY apologizing, so Pitino would have to bend on that one for example.

As far as past cheating goes (and that is the issue), Pitino could go clean. Let's face it, at SJU, he is not competing against Kentucky, Duke, NC, for example.

If Pitino gets very good foundation 3-4 star players, and coaches them up (and there is no arguing his coaching abilities), and gets this program to an elite eight in 3 years, he will be a conquering hero.

And if SJU, by the grace of St. John himself, ever gets to an elite eight, higher level kids will want to come here (just ask Mike Jarvis).

That is not a stretch, because coaching players up, and preaching defense, goes a long way. Just look at this year's championship game as an example.

Again, Pitino is a high risk. There is a lot to dislike. I am torn because of it.

First, if a high level recruit comes here, the whispering of shady recruiting will certainly pop up, and cause anxiety.

Conversely, if Pitino goes to another school and makes them a consistent top 25 program, I would sink into depression.

I would hate to make that call. I would not be able to sleep for the entire season either way.[/quote]

Hurley is a risk. If going to take a risk I would rather go with the HOF college coach.
 
[quote="Moose" post=339152][quote="Beast of the East" post=339149][quote="Moose" post=339142]One thing I find funny here. if you look up old posts about Pitino he would routinely ripped on this site. People saying he doesn't care about SJU etc...

I always knew he had an affinity for SJU but everyone felt it wasn't genuine or whatever.

Now he publicly speaks about his affinity for SJU and everyone is drooling and changing their boxers. Pretty funny if you ask me.[/quote]

Moose, my recollection is that when Cal was at UMASS and asked Pitino about a vacant SJU position, Pitino advised that he was better off to stay at UMASS as it was a better program. He may have steered Donovan away also, but Donovan had his own beef against Lou that was not warranted.[/quote]

I can only speak to my time as a fan 2000 on. And Pitino has always spoken highly of SJU to people. He has ties to Repole and a few other donors as well.

Curious regarding Donovan rift? Wasn't his Dad on the Board or something?

* Also Cal was never coming here after his comments about Lou[/quote]

* last comment would be true.

I believe Donovan's dad was a university employee. Not sure.

Donovan's anger at Lou was based on the fact that he badly wanted to play here. Lou told him he thought he could compete at D1, but he wasn't good enough to play at St. John's. Lou then graciously made a call to Joe Mullany at Providence and put in a strong word for him. Donovan went to Providence, was overweight and mediocre for 3 years, until Pitino arrived and told him to get in shape if he wanted to play. He lost about 20-25 lbs, started at point, and Providence I think went to the Final Four. Pitino subsequently left for the Knicks, and signed Donovan to at least some 10 days contracts. Donovan subsequently locally bad mouthed Carnesecca whenever he could for not giving him the chance to play here.
 
Last edited:
[quote="we are sju" post=339158][quote="kranmars" post=339153]I am not endorsing, or ruling Pitino out. I am trying to look at it as objectively as I can.

If Pitino was hired, I would think a lot of research and discussions have taken place (they most likely are going anyway, as part of due diligence). Many of the concerns would have to alleviated first.

I cannot see the southern district of NY apologizing, so Pitino would have to bend on that one for example.

As far as past cheating goes (and that is the issue), Pitino could go clean. Let's face it, at SJU, he is not competing against Kentucky, Duke, NC, for example.

If Pitino gets very good foundation 3-4 star players, and coaches them up (and there is no arguing his coaching abilities), and gets this program to an elite eight in 3 years, he will be a conquering hero.

And if SJU, by the grace of St. John himself, ever gets to an elite eight, higher level kids will want to come here (just ask Mike Jarvis).

That is not a stretch, because coaching players up, and preaching defense, goes a long way. Just look at this year's championship game as an example.

Again, Pitino is a high risk. There is a lot to dislike. I am torn because of it.

First, if a high level recruit comes here, the whispering of shady recruiting will certainly pop up, and cause anxiety.

Conversely, if Pitino goes to another school and makes them a consistent top 25 program, I would sink into depression.

I would hate to make that call. I would not be able to sleep for the entire season either way.[/quote]

Hurley is a risk. If going to take a risk I would rather go with the HOF college coach.[/quote]

Of course he is. All coaches are.

My point is that I think Pitino's is greater, but the reward is also much higher.
 
[quote="Chris7" post=339155][quote="Beast of the East" post=339129][quote="IDRAFT" post=339125][quote="Knight" post=339063][quote="IDRAFT" post=339049][quote="adavis1" post=339029]If St. John's wants to win Pitino is the obvious hire. As a non-Catholic and someone who didn't go to SJU I'm interested in what in Pitino's past is keeping St. John's from hiring him. Is it the affair(s)? Donald Trump is President (with a majority of the Catholic vote). Is it the obviously dirty programs he ran? Does anybody even pretend to care about that anymore? The NCAA is obviously immoral and I assume every school cheats or turns a blind eye to it. Is Pitino a non-starter for the important people at St. John's because he paid for an abortion? I ask this with complete respect and curiosity is paying for an abortion the unforgivable sin keeping St. John's from hiring Pitino?[/quote]

The priest at my wife’s church read a ringing endorsement of Trump during a mass from the Rockville Center Diocese! But a line gets drawn here. So hypocritical.[/quote]

Endorsement of what? I am dubious of a priest reading anything political in church. What parish?[/quote]

Endorsement for President. Notre Dame New Hyde Park.[/quote]

To my knowledge, there are strict guidelines against church's endorsing candidates for political office. They have been accused of doing this over time, but often what is and can be advocated from the pulpit are voting for candidates in line with church teachings on abortion, concerns for the poor, etc. Sometimes those in pews have to connect the dots, as in a statement like this: "There may be no greater issue than protecting the killing of innocent unborn children. With election day approaching, there are clear choices on this subject."

Saying vote for Trump or any candidate could jeopardize tax free status of churches.[/quote]

I think OP may be referring to in the months before the election, the bishop of RVC wrote a letter saying essentially to vote for the candidate who is against abortion and priests were directed to share this message. Obviously it wasn't as blunt as referring to abortion, but if you could read the tea leaves of the homily, etc. you would get the message.[/quote]

That's the kind of thing I was inferring. Not against the rules at all. Except if the priest connected the dots and said vote for Trump
 
Look, Pitino is among the best silver tongues ever to coach in college. He'd say great things about us after running us off the court. He'd heap praise on us when it didn't cost him a cent or a recruit. I don't know how different that is than anyone else, but by cmparison I would say Bobby Knight had a deep and enduring reverence for Joe Lapchick, and that impacted his positive view of SJU for his entire career.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Beast of the East" post=339166][quote="Chris7" post=339155][quote="Beast of the East" post=339129][quote="IDRAFT" post=339125][quote="Knight" post=339063][quote="IDRAFT" post=339049][quote="adavis1" post=339029]If St. John's wants to win Pitino is the obvious hire. As a non-Catholic and someone who didn't go to SJU I'm interested in what in Pitino's past is keeping St. John's from hiring him. Is it the affair(s)? Donald Trump is President (with a majority of the Catholic vote). Is it the obviously dirty programs he ran? Does anybody even pretend to care about that anymore? The NCAA is obviously immoral and I assume every school cheats or turns a blind eye to it. Is Pitino a non-starter for the important people at St. John's because he paid for an abortion? I ask this with complete respect and curiosity is paying for an abortion the unforgivable sin keeping St. John's from hiring Pitino?[/quote]

The priest at my wife’s church read a ringing endorsement of Trump during a mass from the Rockville Center Diocese! But a line gets drawn here. So hypocritical.[/quote]

Endorsement of what? I am dubious of a priest reading anything political in church. What parish?[/quote]

Endorsement for President. Notre Dame New Hyde Park.[/quote]

To my knowledge, there are strict guidelines against church's endorsing candidates for political office. They have been accused of doing this over time, but often what is and can be advocated from the pulpit are voting for candidates in line with church teachings on abortion, concerns for the poor, etc. Sometimes those in pews have to connect the dots, as in a statement like this: "There may be no greater issue than protecting the killing of innocent unborn children. With election day approaching, there are clear choices on this subject."

Saying vote for Trump or any candidate could jeopardize tax free status of churches.[/quote]

I think OP may be referring to in the months before the election, the bishop of RVC wrote a letter saying essentially to vote for the candidate who is against abortion and priests were directed to share this message. Obviously it wasn't as blunt as referring to abortion, but if you could read the tea leaves of the homily, etc. you would get the message.[/quote]

That's the kind of thing I was inferring. Not against the rules at all. Except if the priest connected the dots and said vote for Trump[/quote]

Well here it is. And what else was said I did hear secondhand, but the only person I know who is more honest than my wife is my mother-in-law. And both of them relayed the information, as they were horrified. But I will let that part go as I didn't hear it myself and maybe they were shellshocked by the actual disgusting memo. It is VERY clear who they want you to vote for - the ******grabber. So ends justifies the means for President but not a basketball coach? It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

"Thoughts for consideration as we approach Election Day – a letter from Bishop William Murphy read at all Masses in the Diocese of Rockville Centre (Long Island, New York) on Sunday, October 30, 2016 and published on the Diocesan website. Please consider sharing with others.
October 24, 2016
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ:
With Election Day just two weeks away, the decisions you and I will make are important ones. Each and every one of us has a very important role to play. We have to decide who will get our vote. Permit me the opportunity to share with you some thoughts I ask you to consider.
First and foremost, pray. Spend time in prayer asking God to guide you and your family and our country during this time. Pray before the Blessed Sacrament, pray to the Blessed Mother, pray the rosary and entrust your decision to our Lord.
Like many of you, I lament the current climate of division, and the mean spiritedness and intolerance of some toward those who do not agree with candidates and positions that do not fit their worldview. If you think you are confused and slightly battered by the noise, public protests and private misgivings, you have every reason to be so. But as responsible citizens and faithful men and women of God, we have to exercise our right to vote in a way that is serious, well-informed and reflective of who we are as Americans and Catholics.
We believe in God. We know He is the creator and thus God is intimately present in all things -- the world, human life, communities, choices and elections. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI said, “Those who deny God can lead us only in a direction that ultimately is destructive”.
The human person, made in the image and likeness of God, is the ultimate measure of what is good or bad, right or wrong. Every person is sacred and has inherent rights which political leaders must protect and serve. Those who do not are unworthy of our vote. Those who contradict themselves by saying one thing and doing another are unworthy of our vote.
Many issues are very important in our society today. But none of them can eclipse the centrality of human life, especially innocent human life in the womb or at the end of life. Above all and over all, the number one issue more fundamental and crucial than any other is abortion – that is the direct taking of innocent life, which is financed by government funds -- the diversion of our tax dollars to abortionists like Planned Parenthood as well as government insistence that we Catholics like the Little Sisters of the Poor, violate our consciences to advance such programs.
Support of abortion by a candidate for public office, some of whom are Catholics, even if they use the fallacious and deeply offensive “personally opposed but . . .” line, is reason sufficient unto itself to disqualify any and every such candidate from receiving our vote. Let me repeat that: Support of abortion by a candidate for public office, some of whom are Catholics, even if they use the fallacious and deeply offensive “personally opposed but . . .” line, is reason sufficient unto itself to disqualify any and every such candidate from receiving our vote.
I have three questions to end this letter! Please reflect upon these as you examine your conscience and prepare to exercise your right to vote.
1.Do you think our country is going in the right direction or the wrong direction? I believe it is heading in the wrong direction. If I am right, then,
2.Of the two candidates running for President, and of all of the candidates running for elective office, whether federal, state or local, which ones will continue to lead us in the current direction or which are more likely to restore justice in those areas that cry out for such a restoration?
3.Which ones are willing to lead us in a direction that is more pro life, more pro family and more pro truth? Which ones will recognize and respect the role of religion in the lives of citizens and the Church’s right to mediate the truths of the Gospel and the Church’s teaching as part of the public life of our country, in public ministries like health care, education and charitable works, without being forced to adopt and facilitate those cultural practices that are not consonant with Church teaching?
For further insight, I have written two columns on voting in The Long Island Catholic Magazine. They are also available on the diocesan website, www.drvc.org. In addition, the U.S. Bishops have prepared a teaching document on the political responsibility of Catholics called “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship”. It is also available online. I urge you to consider thoughtfully these resources along with this letter as you go through the process of deciding whom you will support with your vote.
May God bless you and your families and may God continue to bless the United States of America.
Faithfully yours in Christ,

Bishop of Rockville Centre
PO Box 9023, Rockville Centre, New York 11571–9023 • telephone 516.678.5800 • fax 516.678.3138 • www.drvc.org"
 
We have a chance to finally fix this 20+ year problem for real. The stars have aligned for this to finally happen!

Sadly, I am quite sure that they will not even conisder it for real.

It is beyond a no-brainer to get Coach Pitino in at Utopia and Union. We need eachother! Win-win! Instead, we will continue to lose-lose.
 
Last edited:
[quote="IDRAFT" post=339177][quote="Beast of the East" post=339166][quote="Chris7" post=339155][quote="Beast of the East" post=339129][quote="IDRAFT" post=339125][quote="Knight" post=339063][quote="IDRAFT" post=339049][quote="adavis1" post=339029]If St. John's wants to win Pitino is the obvious hire. As a non-Catholic and someone who didn't go to SJU I'm interested in what in Pitino's past is keeping St. John's from hiring him. Is it the affair(s)? Donald Trump is President (with a majority of the Catholic vote). Is it the obviously dirty programs he ran? Does anybody even pretend to care about that anymore? The NCAA is obviously immoral and I assume every school cheats or turns a blind eye to it. Is Pitino a non-starter for the important people at St. John's because he paid for an abortion? I ask this with complete respect and curiosity is paying for an abortion the unforgivable sin keeping St. John's from hiring Pitino?[/quote]

The priest at my wife’s church read a ringing endorsement of Trump during a mass from the Rockville Center Diocese! But a line gets drawn here. So hypocritical.[/quote]

Endorsement of what? I am dubious of a priest reading anything political in church. What parish?[/quote]

Endorsement for President. Notre Dame New Hyde Park.[/quote]

To my knowledge, there are strict guidelines against church's endorsing candidates for political office. They have been accused of doing this over time, but often what is and can be advocated from the pulpit are voting for candidates in line with church teachings on abortion, concerns for the poor, etc. Sometimes those in pews have to connect the dots, as in a statement like this: "There may be no greater issue than protecting the killing of innocent unborn children. With election day approaching, there are clear choices on this subject."

Saying vote for Trump or any candidate could jeopardize tax free status of churches.[/quote]

I think OP may be referring to in the months before the election, the bishop of RVC wrote a letter saying essentially to vote for the candidate who is against abortion and priests were directed to share this message. Obviously it wasn't as blunt as referring to abortion, but if you could read the tea leaves of the homily, etc. you would get the message.[/quote]

That's the kind of thing I was inferring. Not against the rules at all. Except if the priest connected the dots and said vote for Trump[/quote]

Well here it is. And what else was said I did hear secondhand, but the only person I know who is more honest than my wife is my mother-in-law. And both of them relayed the information, as they were horrified. But I will let that part go as I didn't hear it myself and maybe they were shellshocked by the actual disgusting memo. It is VERY clear who they want you to vote for - the ******grabber. So ends justifies the means for President but not a basketball coach? It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

"Thoughts for consideration as we approach Election Day – a letter from Bishop William Murphy read at all Masses in the Diocese of Rockville Centre (Long Island, New York) on Sunday, October 30, 2016 and published on the Diocesan website. Please consider sharing with others.
October 24, 2016
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ:
With Election Day just two weeks away, the decisions you and I will make are important ones. Each and every one of us has a very important role to play. We have to decide who will get our vote. Permit me the opportunity to share with you some thoughts I ask you to consider.
First and foremost, pray. Spend time in prayer asking God to guide you and your family and our country during this time. Pray before the Blessed Sacrament, pray to the Blessed Mother, pray the rosary and entrust your decision to our Lord.
Like many of you, I lament the current climate of division, and the mean spiritedness and intolerance of some toward those who do not agree with candidates and positions that do not fit their worldview. If you think you are confused and slightly battered by the noise, public protests and private misgivings, you have every reason to be so. But as responsible citizens and faithful men and women of God, we have to exercise our right to vote in a way that is serious, well-informed and reflective of who we are as Americans and Catholics.
We believe in God. We know He is the creator and thus God is intimately present in all things -- the world, human life, communities, choices and elections. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI said, “Those who deny God can lead us only in a direction that ultimately is destructive”.
The human person, made in the image and likeness of God, is the ultimate measure of what is good or bad, right or wrong. Every person is sacred and has inherent rights which political leaders must protect and serve. Those who do not are unworthy of our vote. Those who contradict themselves by saying one thing and doing another are unworthy of our vote.
Many issues are very important in our society today. But none of them can eclipse the centrality of human life, especially innocent human life in the womb or at the end of life. Above all and over all, the number one issue more fundamental and crucial than any other is abortion – that is the direct taking of innocent life, which is financed by government funds -- the diversion of our tax dollars to abortionists like Planned Parenthood as well as government insistence that we Catholics like the Little Sisters of the Poor, violate our consciences to advance such programs.
Support of abortion by a candidate for public office, some of whom are Catholics, even if they use the fallacious and deeply offensive “personally opposed but . . .” line, is reason sufficient unto itself to disqualify any and every such candidate from receiving our vote. Let me repeat that: Support of abortion by a candidate for public office, some of whom are Catholics, even if they use the fallacious and deeply offensive “personally opposed but . . .” line, is reason sufficient unto itself to disqualify any and every such candidate from receiving our vote.
I have three questions to end this letter! Please reflect upon these as you examine your conscience and prepare to exercise your right to vote.
1.Do you think our country is going in the right direction or the wrong direction? I believe it is heading in the wrong direction. If I am right, then,
2.Of the two candidates running for President, and of all of the candidates running for elective office, whether federal, state or local, which ones will continue to lead us in the current direction or which are more likely to restore justice in those areas that cry out for such a restoration?
3.Which ones are willing to lead us in a direction that is more pro life, more pro family and more pro truth? Which ones will recognize and respect the role of religion in the lives of citizens and the Church’s right to mediate the truths of the Gospel and the Church’s teaching as part of the public life of our country, in public ministries like health care, education and charitable works, without being forced to adopt and facilitate those cultural practices that are not consonant with Church teaching?
For further insight, I have written two columns on voting in The Long Island Catholic Magazine. They are also available on the diocesan website, www.drvc.org. In addition, the U.S. Bishops have prepared a teaching document on the political responsibility of Catholics called “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship”. It is also available online. I urge you to consider thoughtfully these resources along with this letter as you go through the process of deciding whom you will support with your vote.
May God bless you and your families and may God continue to bless the United States of America.
Faithfully yours in Christ,

Bishop of Rockville Centre
PO Box 9023, Rockville Centre, New York 11571–9023 • telephone 516.678.5800 • fax 516.678.3138 • www.drvc.org"[/quote]

IDRAFT- I did not say you were a liar. Sorry you took it that way. I remember reading that letter (thanks for reposting), which I had no issues with at that time, or even now. Bishop was doing his job of leading his flock and providing guidance. The differences regarding abortion between the 2 parties was and is clearly defined. But let's save that conversation for another time and a different thread.
 
[quote="kranmars" post=339153]I am not endorsing, or ruling Pitino out. I am trying to look at it as objectively as I can.

If Pitino was hired, I would think a lot of research and discussions have taken place (they most likely are going anyway, as part of due diligence). Many of the concerns would have to alleviated first.

I cannot see the southern district of NY apologizing, so Pitino would have to bend on that one for example.

As far as past cheating goes (and that is the issue), Pitino could go clean. Let's face it, at SJU, he is not competing against Kentucky, Duke, NC, for example.

If Pitino gets very good foundation 3-4 star players, and coaches them up (and there is no arguing his coaching abilities), and gets this program to an elite eight in 3 years, he will be a conquering hero.

And if SJU, by the grace of St. John himself, ever gets to an elite eight, higher level kids will want to come here (just ask Mike Jarvis).

That is not a stretch, because coaching players up, and preaching defense, goes a long way. Just look at this year's championship game as an example.

Again, Pitino is a high risk. There is a lot to dislike. I am torn because of it.

First, if a high level recruit comes here, the whispering of shady recruiting will certainly pop up, and cause anxiety.

Conversely, if Pitino goes to another school and makes them a consistent top 25 program, I would sink into depression.

I would hate to make that call. I would not be able to sleep for the entire season either way.[/quote]

Nothing to discuss, get a sure thing over a pray, and hope he doesn't cheat.
We been a not nothing program for so long, it's now or never in my eyes.
 
"Knight wrote: IDRAFT- I did not say you were a liar. Sorry you took it that way. I remember reading that letter (thanks for reposting), which I had no issues with at that time, or even now. Bishop was doing his job of leading his flock and providing guidance. The differences regarding abortion between the 2 parties was and is clearly defined. But let's save that conversation for another time and a different thread."

Fair enough even though I strongly disagree. And it has nothing to do with who is being championed. My last words on this, promise. In my opinion churches should have the following to say to people about the voting process - nothing. And I also believe the government should not tell anyone what faith to practice. I do also understand this is far from a Catholic only issue.
 
[quote="IDRAFT" post=339177][quote="Beast of the East" post=339166][quote="Chris7" post=339155][quote="Beast of the East" post=339129][quote="IDRAFT" post=339125][quote="Knight" post=339063][quote="IDRAFT" post=339049][quote="adavis1" post=339029]If St. John's wants to win Pitino is the obvious hire. As a non-Catholic and someone who didn't go to SJU I'm interested in what in Pitino's past is keeping St. John's from hiring him. Is it the affair(s)? Donald Trump is President (with a majority of the Catholic vote). Is it the obviously dirty programs he ran? Does anybody even pretend to care about that anymore? The NCAA is obviously immoral and I assume every school cheats or turns a blind eye to it. Is Pitino a non-starter for the important people at St. John's because he paid for an abortion? I ask this with complete respect and curiosity is paying for an abortion the unforgivable sin keeping St. John's from hiring Pitino?[/quote]

The priest at my wife’s church read a ringing endorsement of Trump during a mass from the Rockville Center Diocese! But a line gets drawn here. So hypocritical.[/quote]

Endorsement of what? I am dubious of a priest reading anything political in church. What parish?[/quote]

Endorsement for President. Notre Dame New Hyde Park.[/quote]

To my knowledge, there are strict guidelines against church's endorsing candidates for political office. They have been accused of doing this over time, but often what is and can be advocated from the pulpit are voting for candidates in line with church teachings on abortion, concerns for the poor, etc. Sometimes those in pews have to connect the dots, as in a statement like this: "There may be no greater issue than protecting the killing of innocent unborn children. With election day approaching, there are clear choices on this subject."

Saying vote for Trump or any candidate could jeopardize tax free status of churches.[/quote]

I think OP may be referring to in the months before the election, the bishop of RVC wrote a letter saying essentially to vote for the candidate who is against abortion and priests were directed to share this message. Obviously it wasn't as blunt as referring to abortion, but if you could read the tea leaves of the homily, etc. you would get the message.[/quote]

That's the kind of thing I was inferring. Not against the rules at all. Except if the priest connected the dots and said vote for Trump[/quote]

Well here it is. And what else was said I did hear secondhand, but the only person I know who is more honest than my wife is my mother-in-law. And both of them relayed the information, as they were horrified. But I will let that part go as I didn't hear it myself and maybe they were shellshocked by the actual disgusting memo. It is VERY clear who they want you to vote for - the ******grabber. So ends justifies the means for President but not a basketball coach? It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

"Thoughts for consideration as we approach Election Day – a letter from Bishop William Murphy read at all Masses in the Diocese of Rockville Centre (Long Island, New York) on Sunday, October 30, 2016 and published on the Diocesan website. Please consider sharing with others.
October 24, 2016
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ:
With Election Day just two weeks away, the decisions you and I will make are important ones. Each and every one of us has a very important role to play. We have to decide who will get our vote. Permit me the opportunity to share with you some thoughts I ask you to consider.
First and foremost, pray. Spend time in prayer asking God to guide you and your family and our country during this time. Pray before the Blessed Sacrament, pray to the Blessed Mother, pray the rosary and entrust your decision to our Lord.
Like many of you, I lament the current climate of division, and the mean spiritedness and intolerance of some toward those who do not agree with candidates and positions that do not fit their worldview. If you think you are confused and slightly battered by the noise, public protests and private misgivings, you have every reason to be so. But as responsible citizens and faithful men and women of God, we have to exercise our right to vote in a way that is serious, well-informed and reflective of who we are as Americans and Catholics.
We believe in God. We know He is the creator and thus God is intimately present in all things -- the world, human life, communities, choices and elections. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI said, “Those who deny God can lead us only in a direction that ultimately is destructive”.
The human person, made in the image and likeness of God, is the ultimate measure of what is good or bad, right or wrong. Every person is sacred and has inherent rights which political leaders must protect and serve. Those who do not are unworthy of our vote. Those who contradict themselves by saying one thing and doing another are unworthy of our vote.
Many issues are very important in our society today. But none of them can eclipse the centrality of human life, especially innocent human life in the womb or at the end of life. Above all and over all, the number one issue more fundamental and crucial than any other is abortion – that is the direct taking of innocent life, which is financed by government funds -- the diversion of our tax dollars to abortionists like Planned Parenthood as well as government insistence that we Catholics like the Little Sisters of the Poor, violate our consciences to advance such programs.
Support of abortion by a candidate for public office, some of whom are Catholics, even if they use the fallacious and deeply offensive “personally opposed but . . .” line, is reason sufficient unto itself to disqualify any and every such candidate from receiving our vote. Let me repeat that: Support of abortion by a candidate for public office, some of whom are Catholics, even if they use the fallacious and deeply offensive “personally opposed but . . .” line, is reason sufficient unto itself to disqualify any and every such candidate from receiving our vote.
I have three questions to end this letter! Please reflect upon these as you examine your conscience and prepare to exercise your right to vote.
1.Do you think our country is going in the right direction or the wrong direction? I believe it is heading in the wrong direction. If I am right, then,
2.Of the two candidates running for President, and of all of the candidates running for elective office, whether federal, state or local, which ones will continue to lead us in the current direction or which are more likely to restore justice in those areas that cry out for such a restoration?
3.Which ones are willing to lead us in a direction that is more pro life, more pro family and more pro truth? Which ones will recognize and respect the role of religion in the lives of citizens and the Church’s right to mediate the truths of the Gospel and the Church’s teaching as part of the public life of our country, in public ministries like health care, education and charitable works, without being forced to adopt and facilitate those cultural practices that are not consonant with Church teaching?
For further insight, I have written two columns on voting in The Long Island Catholic Magazine. They are also available on the diocesan website, www.drvc.org. In addition, the U.S. Bishops have prepared a teaching document on the political responsibility of Catholics called “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship”. It is also available online. I urge you to consider thoughtfully these resources along with this letter as you go through the process of deciding whom you will support with your vote.
May God bless you and your families and may God continue to bless the United States of America.
Faithfully yours in Christ,

Bishop of Rockville Centre
PO Box 9023, Rockville Centre, New York 11571–9023 • telephone 516.678.5800 • fax 516.678.3138 • www.drvc.org"[/quote]

One thing I will say, and your response is a perfect example of how deeply polarized we are, is that Murphy is not a dope and probably was well within bounds legally by sending the letter you referenced.

I remember vaguely the letter, but honestly Bishop Murphy is not my moral guide on any matter. But he likely was within bounds sending it. I can't speak to what the priest said or didn't say about it, and I can see why someone would be offended by it.

To be fair about the church, while adamant against abortion, they are also on the front lines of immigration reform and services to undocumented or illegal aliens.
 
Woah. Triggered. Beast, you are absolutely right. Polarization at it's finest (aka worst).


Back to people relaying tweets and pipedreams as fact. Like Bobby G hiring Pitino.
 
Last edited:
Not the point at all. St John's is not the church. St. John's is a UNIVERSITY that seeks to express a mission consistent with the Catholic Church whilst teaching kids how to be adults and get a job etc.

It is in that framework that Pitino is wholly unsuited to be hired here.

The whole point of a university is to instill knowledge and wisdom in its students. The additional point of a Catholic university is to do so with a Catholic mission and philosophy.

To hire Pitino flies in the face of fulfilling those goals.

Students have the choice to go to a Catholic school or not. If they chose to go to St. Johns they do so knowing the atmosphere and educational approach will be tinged with Catholicism. Some actually demand it.

So, unless SJU wants to replicate Marist (which a few years/decades ago separated itself from being a Catholic affiliated school), Pitino is a non-starter.

SJU is not a basketball franchise. The basketball team is an adjunct to the school and is subject to all of the attributes that the school has. Catholicism and instruction in that context included.

The BOT has the obligation to maintain that, and past failings to do so don't justify future knowing failures to do so.
 
Maybe we strip Pitino naked and do a "Shame Walk" around campus. Great coach, yes. Flawed, yes. I don't remember Pitino owning up to doing anything wrong with his Louisville program.
 
[quote="redmanwest" post=339207]Not the point at all. St John's is not the church. St. John's is a UNIVERSITY that seeks to express a mission consistent with the Catholic Church whilst teaching kids how to be adults and get a job etc.

It is in that framework that Pitino is wholly unsuited to be hired here.

The whole point of a university is to instill knowledge and wisdom in its students. The additional point of a Catholic university is to do so with a Catholic mission and philosophy.

To hire Pitino flies in the face of fulfilling those goals.

Students have the choice to go to a Catholic school or not. If they chose to go to St. Johns they do so knowing the atmosphere and educational approach will be tinged with Catholicism. Some actually demand it.

So, unless SJU wants to replicate Marist (which a few years/decades ago separated itself from being a Catholic affiliated school), Pitino is a non-starter.

SJU is not a basketball franchise. The basketball team is an adjunct to the school and is subject to all of the attributes that the school has. Catholicism and instruction in that context included.

The BOT has the obligation to maintain that, and past failings to do so don't justify future knowing failures to do so.[/quote]

Not that I am any authority on religion but isn't part of any religion a right to redeem and have a second chance? If this angle is used it could be the right justification hook :)
 
[quote="Knight" post=339212]Maybe we strip Pitino naked and do a "Shame Walk" around campus. Great coach, yes. Flawed, yes. I don't remember Pitino owning up to doing anything wrong with his Louisville program.[/quote]

Pete Rose either.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=339216][quote="Knight" post=339212]Maybe we strip Pitino naked and do a "Shame Walk" around campus. Great coach, yes. Flawed, yes. I don't remember Pitino owning up to doing anything wrong with his Louisville program.[/quote]

Pete Rose either.[/quote]

Rose however did time.
 
Back
Top