beast of the east
Active member
PM me.Knight post=451596 said:Anyone hear any news of Pitino’s predecessor, Kevin Cleuss?
PM me.Knight post=451596 said:Anyone hear any news of Pitino’s predecessor, Kevin Cleuss?
fordham96 post=451568 said:Most? Did you really have to think when you compare the coaching of Pitino to Mahoney, Jarvis, Roberts, Lavin, Mullin and Anderson?
Seriously? Whatever you think of Pitino personally you are talking about one of the top 2 or 3 coaches of his generation. There is no one seriously who would argue with that.
Ray Morgan post=451499
He can coach circles around most of the post Looie hires.
I was being generous. I also made it quite clear he is one of the elite basketball minds in the game.
Lets' face it., the most important skill a coach can have is bringing in a roster of great players. While he will get the most out of whatever talent he can bring here, my guess is that he will be recruiting with a pair of handcuffs he did not have to wear at his other stops. I also posted a long time ago that Pitino at Iona is a great litmus test for determining if a coach, by his mere reputation and presence, can recruit at a high level despite being limited by lesser facilities and despite having to run a clean program. As for the answer, I don't believe he has brought in a 4 star recruit yet.
Would that change if he was wearing the St. John's logo on his shirt? I doubt we will ever find out.
I would imagine his goal is to build a top 25 roster, annihilate his conference, and have a strong OOC schedule that would showcase how good they are and gain national attention.fordham96 post=451601 said:No that is not how it works. 4 and 5 star kids are not going to Iona no matter if Pitino or K or Calipari are coaching there. Again that is not the litmus test. Furthermore if they did it would simply be written here as he "buys players" and the proof would be "Why else would a top 50 kid go to a MAAC school unless they were getting paid." It would give further creedence to the idea he is a product of just cheating.
Yes he is a great coach but those kids want to be on TV and play high quality competition EVERY night. Going to Iona is not suddenly going to put Iona vs Niagara on ESPN and CBS nor is it suddenly going to make the NIagara's land similar type of players.
Agreed. I would say if it is true that he is out selling donors on new facilities, he may stick around as coach till age 75 or beyond.fordham96 post=451605 said:Yes and he already is getting a few kids that could definitely play/be recruited to Power5+BE type of schools. He said he has a kid on his team that he would have recruited to Louisville. But again that is still a far cry from consistently getting top 75 and top 50 kids to Iona no matter how good he is. Those kids for the most part are still going to want to go to schools that play high level competition and get on TV and get high seeds in the NCAA's. None of those things happen at Iona no matter how good Rick is.
But yeah his reputation and greatness will get some kids especially transfers that maybe able to make a power 5 roster but say would rather go to Iona get coached up by the best and excel at a lower level school. He is going to get that kid a lot as did Cluess. Rick will just dominate a little more and like you said try to play a better non-conference schedule.
But that doesn't mean he starts getting kids he could consistently get at Louisville at Iona. That is not how it works.
Beast of the East post=451602
I would imagine his goal is to build a top 25 roster, annihilate his conference, and have a strong OOC schedule that would showcase how good they are and gain national attention.fordham96 post=451601 said:
He is a great salesman, and a great coach, so he may be able to do things at Iona in terms of transfers and HS recruits that most coaches could not.
fordham96 post=451601 said:No that is not how it works. 4 and 5 star kids are not going to Iona no matter if Pitino or K or Calipari are coaching there. Again that is not the litmus test. Furthermore if they did it would simply be written here as he "buys players" and the proof would be "Why else would a top 50 kid go to a MAAC school unless they were getting paid." It would give further creedence to the idea he is a product of just cheating.
Yes he is a great coach but those kids want to be on TV and play high quality competition EVERY night. Going to Iona is not suddenly going to put Iona vs Niagara on ESPN and CBS nor is it suddenly going to make the NIagara's land similar type of players.
So are you saying that 4 star kids would be attracted to St. John's if Pitino was the coach, even without improving the facilities and even if he had to recruit without funny business? Every coach since Looie had MSG, nightly good competition, and every game on TV. Hasn't worked so far. Would all that change if Pitino was hired next year? I don't think anyone knows the answer. I do know that St. John's is not on the short list of schools the NCAA would protect if a scandal occurs.
That poll wasn't really a ranking of desirability. It was a ranking of 8 criteria and then an equal weighting of the scores of all 8. But some criteria are more important than others which that poll did not take into account.fordham96 post=451621 said:And one last thing on the facilities and other things. Jeff Goodman polled the BE coaches a few years ago to rank the BE jobs, best to worst. SJU was top half, number 5 using a series of criteria.
Now since then UCONN has joined and you would probably have to put them in the top half certainly. But this idea SJU is bottom 3-4 jobs is nonsense. It is still a good job. And there is a money.
The most interesting thing is they still ranked Georgetown as the BEST BE job even at a time when they were swooning and Nova was coming off 2 NC's in 3 years.
https://watchstadium.com/big-east-b...k-the-best-jobs-in-the-conference-11-02-2018/
salty dog post=451573 said:What an absolute waste of time this thread is
I don't think we want to go down that rabbit hole. Whether true or not, it's a message board on a college basketball team. You have to go back 6 presidents to the last time they won a NCAA game, and most were 2 term presidents. If it keeps the fans posting, then it serves a purpose.
You are not expressing the poll correctly. The coaches didn't rank the programs, they ranked the criteria, then the publication just equal-weighted the different criteria.fordham96 post=451628 said:Facilities was a part of that poll. And the poll was done by the coaches themselves. Not by fans so not sure why your opinion should be weighed greater than theirs. I am not suggesting SJU has great facilities but most of the other BE schools are not great or very poor.
The fact is SJU is not a bad job relative to other BE schools. It just isn't. The fact that the coaches put Georgetown above Villanova is evidence that Georgetown despite not having much recent success is still considered a good job.
Proud Alumn post=451623
That poll wasn't really a ranking of desirability. It was a ranking of 8 criteria and then an equal weighting of the scores of all 8. But some criteria are more important than others which that poll did not take into account.fordham96 post=451621 said:
What makes the St. John's job desirable compared to other BE schools?
-The ability to live and earn a good income in the NY area, for those that love NY.
- Media. Not really. We don't get much coverage with all the pro teams in the area. It could be a positive with winning teams but that is a chicken and egg dynamic.
- The fan base. Eh, not a big differentiator from other schools.
- MSG. It is a positive, but again, not the differentiator that it used to be.
- Recruiting NY area talent. Same thing, not a big factor anymore.
- Facilities. Among the worst.
The key way to improve the program would be to improve the facilities and focus on NY as showplace to be.
Proud Alumn post=451623 said:That poll wasn't really a ranking of desirability. It was a ranking of 8 criteria and then an equal weighting of the scores of all 8. But some criteria are more important than others which that poll did not take into account.fordham96 post=451621 said:And one last thing on the facilities and other things. Jeff Goodman polled the BE coaches a few years ago to rank the BE jobs, best to worst. SJU was top half, number 5 using a series of criteria.
Now since then UCONN has joined and you would probably have to put them in the top half certainly. But this idea SJU is bottom 3-4 jobs is nonsense. It is still a good job. And there is a money.
The most interesting thing is they still ranked Georgetown as the BEST BE job even at a time when they were swooning and Nova was coming off 2 NC's in 3 years.
https://watchstadium.com/big-east-b...k-the-best-jobs-in-the-conference-11-02-2018/
What makes the St. John's job desirable compared to other BE schools?
-The ability to live and earn a good income in the NY area, for those that love NY.
- Media. Not really. We don't get much coverage with all the pro teams in the area. It could be a positive with winning teams but that is a chicken and egg dynamic.
- The fan base. Eh, not a big differentiator from other schools.
- MSG. It is a positive, but again, not the differentiator that it used to be.
- Recruiting NY area talent. Same thing, not a big factor anymore.
- Facilities. Among the worst.
The key way to improve the program would be to improve the facilities and focus on NY as showplace to be.
You do know the school president's name is Shanley, and not Stanley? Just asking, How do you know how clean he is at Iona? Did they invite you to Newman Club when you were recruited?richard A Steinfeld post=451638 said:Say what you want about Pitino, but IMO he would have turned our program around in 2 years a lot more the the Cragg,Stanley plan will in 5 years. He’s squicky clean at Iona.
richard A Steinfeld post=451640 said:Sorry for the spelling error. I don’t KNOW any thing, except the higher ups have a tall task restoring our BB program. Furthermore, I was just giving my opinion.