NCAA corruption case poised to take down Hall of Fame coaches, top programs

[quote="Beast of the East" post=273881][quote="Class of 72" post=273874][quote="gman" post=273849][quote="Beast of the East" post=273810][quote="Paul Massell" post=273630]saw this on twitter which to me smacks of Collusion by the University:

Sean Miller’s contract, as written, somehow pays him more for getting fired with cause than without cause. So if Miller is fired with cause, Arizona will owe him approximately $5 million more ($10.3 million versus $5.15 million) than if they fired for

Why else would the University setup a contract like that unless both sides knew they'd be cheating and the University was basically telling him to do so. So his smart lawyer in return says, OK we will do that BUT my guy needs protection.[/quote]

I do a lot of contract work , including employment contracts. Termination with cause almost always eliminates any severance pay whatsoever. I cannot imagine what you suggest is actually true, but we are living in extraordinary times.[/quote]

My dad would say Miller's lawyers were smart enough to ask and Arizona's lawyers were dumb enough to sign the deal.[/quote]

Kind of like Slice's agent and lawyers and St. John's Oliva. All with the support, if not insistence, of a head coach who lobbied for the job while the incumbent head coach was dancing toward an NCAA bid.[/quote]

I don't think it actually went down that way. The people who make the decisions were really on the fence about Lavin. I think that if Lavin had won one or two NCAA games, he would have been back, impossible to fire. I was at the HOF induction for Mullin, CJ Nitkowski, Kia Wright, and a few others. It was long overdue for Mullin, and the first time his schedule would allow it. That was way before any decision to terminate Lavin was made. Chris did spend a pretty long time privately chatting with Coach C. at the event. Don't know the content, of course. I just think that someone could have floated the idea then that weekend. If you want to pervert that into Chris lobbying for the job, it's your prerogative, but I think it's pretty reckless of you to do so, and is just vitriol for your anger over our poor record under Mullin.

It was also pretty clear that Lavin wasn't having a stellar recruiting class coming in, and when we went out quickly in the tourney along with Obekpa's suspension, the change was made. I don't know what the obsession is with Mullin's $2 million salary. Very few people at SJU can say that their support of the team is helping to pay significantly (unless you want to count your season tix). It was a lot easier to spend that amount once Lavin was paid that. Whether Mullin demanded it, or SJU offered it, the fact is, it's his salary, and if he was making more or less wouldn't change our record or anyone's life on here.[/quote]

Let me this say again as I have stated in the past, going back to the Lavin era - I do not root for St. John’s because of who the coach may be but because I support the kids that wear our uniform. If the coach had any influence over my support I would have stopped buying tickets when Brian Mahoney was selected as coach. Although I, like most fans, whether they want to admit it or not, was flabbergasted when St. John's hired Chris Mullin 48 hours after Lavin's departure, once he became our coach along with the Slice and Matt hires, I was on board with the change. Is that crystal clear to you??

You want to sound holier than thou, be my guest!

YOU think that someone could have floated the idea then that weekend.??? NO SHIT SHERLOCK! That was long before we had any issues or final recruiting concerns. That's when it was "floated". Odd when you consider that 2015 season refusing to meet with Lavin regarding any contract extension that had hamstrung his recruiting since the previous season. Odd in that until that game on March 20th with Obekpa out, we had spent 8 weeks nationally ranked or receiving votes. Odd, that the preceeding three months of Chris Mullin's busy schedule, he and his agent had time to work out all the details of his becoming the $2 million coach, sans experience, that many here, maybe you too, criticized as being too rich for what we were getting. Odd in that Mullin was walking a fine line with that house cards that eventually fell called the Sacramento Kings.

So, when you sarcastically say "you want to pervert that into Chris lobbying for the job, it's your prerogative, but I think it's pretty reckless of you to do so, and is just vitriol for your anger over our poor record under Mullin.", it's your prerogative to accuse my opinion as reckless and being vitriolic when the circumstances, even to the most naive Homer such as yourself, dictate otherwise. Be my guest! Be defensive. Deny, deny, and doubt. It's your prerogative!
You, and your cadre, can think had Lavin won ONE NCAA game he would be renewed as coach, can continue imagining. Mullin was already on board before the Big East Tournament and before the pot smoking kid was tested. Good thing they didn't test Sheed also. Lavin’s fate was sealed on November 13, 2014. That's the day Briscoe verballed to Kentucky. No contract, no Briscoe, his days became numbered. By the start of that season fans here has written him off, he had little dialog with the administration and a few sociopaths masquerading as "supporters" privately and publicly started "vitriolic" assaults that only ended with the hire of our saviour Chris Mullin.
We'll buddy, right now it is Chris Mullin that needs saving.
I detest fake fans knocking my team, like that guy Marco Baldi, but I could give a flying fck if anyone wants to be critical of coaches because that's where the BUCK $ STOP.
 
Last edited:
I think Mullin's hiring was the shakeup we needed, even though I supported Lavin. Health and family issues, a perceived lack of recruiting drive, and a weakness with Xs and Os contributed to his downfall. The program needed to blow things up if we really want to be a relevant top ranked team.
 
[quote="Knight" post=273926]I think Mullin's hiring was the shakeup we needed, even though I supported Lavin. Health and family issues, a perceived lack of recruiting drive, and a weakness with Xs and Os contributed to his downfall. The program needed to blow things up if we really want to be a relevant top ranked team.[/quote]

"The program needed to blow things up if we really want to be a relevant top ranked team."

I'm literally LMFO with that comment!!!!!

We blew it up alright!

 
[quote="Class of 72" post=273927][quote="Knight" post=273926]I think Mullin's hiring was the shakeup we needed, even though I supported Lavin. Health and family issues, a perceived lack of recruiting drive, and a weakness with Xs and Os contributed to his downfall. The program needed to blow things up if we really want to be a relevant top ranked team.[/quote]

"The program needed to blow things up if we really want to be a relevant top ranked team."

I'm literally LMFO with that comment!!!!!

We blew it up alright!

[/quote]

I'm so glad you agree.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=273904][quote="SJU85" post=273902][quote="Beast of the East" post=273810][quote="Paul Massell" post=273630]saw this on twitter which to me smacks of Collusion by the University:

Sean Miller’s contract, as written, somehow pays him more for getting fired with cause than without cause. So if Miller is fired with cause, Arizona will owe him approximately $5 million more ($10.3 million versus $5.15 million) than if they fired for no reason.


Why else would the University setup a contract like that unless both sides knew they'd be cheating and the University was basically telling him to do so. So his smart lawyer in return says, OK we will do that BUT my guy needs protection.[/quote]

I do a lot of contract work , including employment contracts. Termination with cause almost always eliminates any severance pay whatsoever. I cannot imagine what you suggest is actually true, but we are living in extraordinary times.[/quote]

While I do not do employment contracts, none of the contracts I have worked on include clauses for termination for cause where the terminated party actually gets “serverance” pay. The concept itself is ridiculous.[/quote]

The only possible thing I can think of that makes sense, is that Miller wanted protection against others in the program committing an offense that he would take the fall for. I cannot think that he would get severance for being fired with cause for his own offense. Whenever you begin with thinking that something ridiculous has happened, there is usually what appears to be a plausible reason behind it.[/quote]

Plausible but if the offense was committed by someone else and you had nothing to do with it, could they fire you for cause. (I mean they could but you in turn could fight it)? That is one of the arguments Pition’s lawyers are arguing regarding his termination (whether anyone believes him or not is a different story). Then again, the Contract could stipulate that you could be fired for cause if anyone on your staff commits a violation.
 
To those posters of off topic and otherwise irrelevant comments, I do not want to have to read those posts and neither does anyone else. Please stop.
 
Have the feeling Arizona will soon go into a free fall. Happy for Justin Simon to have come to St, John's as Zona was seemingly busy buying new players rather than recruiting over fairly.
 
Per @BrucePascoe
Arizona Regents have called a special board meeting for Thursday "for legal advice and discussion regarding University of Arizona men’s basketball and the multiple-year employment contract for the head men’s
basketball coach."
 
[quote="frank61" post=273890]If the NCAA does the investigation, and does not treat all schools and coaches the same way, then it would be a great time to shred the organization and start with an entire new organization. The time for 'FAVORITE COACHES OR SCHOOLS must end. Until then there will never be a level playing field. To continue knowing those things would be an act of stupidity. All schools should insist on a NEW ORGANIZATION.[/quote]
IMO starting a new organization is exactly what the Super 5 conferences hope to do in the long run. Problem is, their goal is to dominate the college $port$ market, have complete autonomy in dealing with "student-athletes" and other issues however they wish to, and have zero interest in including other conferences, to the point of trying to crush them if necessary (see Coach K's comments the last time the ACC raided Big East basketball).
 
[quote="redken" post=274120][quote="frank61" post=273890]If the NCAA does the investigation, and does not treat all schools and coaches the same way, then it would be a great time to shred the organization and start with an entire new organization. The time for 'FAVORITE COACHES OR SCHOOLS must end. Until then there will never be a level playing field. To continue knowing those things would be an act of stupidity. All schools should insist on a NEW ORGANIZATION.[/quote]
IMO starting a new organization is exactly what the Super 5 conferences hope to do in the long run. Problem is, their goal is to dominate the college $port$ market, have complete autonomy in dealing with "student-athletes" and other issues however they wish to, and have zero interest in including other conferences, to the point of trying to crush them if necessary (see Coach K's comments the last time the ACC raided Big East basketball).[/quote]

You can take that out of the opinion column, you state fact; anyone who thinks otherwise is just kidding themselves.
 
Per Rothstein
Arizona has announced a press conference with Sean Miller today at 12:30 MT, per release.

Contract extension ? :)
 
[quote="Paultzman" post=274384]Per Rothstein
Arizona has announced a press conference with Sean Miller today at 12:30 MT, per release.

Contract extension ? :)[/quote]


Poor Coach Miller is underpaid and under-appreciated - dealing with the stress of financial recruiting...therefore...

How about a $40 mil and a private jet extension as with Mr.Goodell? :silly:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really thought he'd get fired, but now I think he stays. And now I hope they win it all just so the NCAA looks even more corrupt than it already is when the FBI releases all its info.
 
[quote="L J S A" post=274389]I really thought he'd get fired, but now I think he stays. And now I hope they win it all just so the NCAA looks even more corrupt than it already is when the FBI releases all its info.[/quote]

Press conference was basically just Sean Miller saying he’s innocent and he will continue coaching.
 
When the Ariz. U board and the AD signed Miller to a contract that guaranteed him almost full pay no matter what violations he committed weren't they telling him to do whatever it takes to compete with the other cheaters, Pitino, Williams, Calipari etc?
 
[quote="Logen" post=274379][quote="redken" post=274120][quote="frank61" post=273890]If the NCAA does the investigation, and does not treat all schools and coaches the same way, then it would be a great time to shred the organization and start with an entire new organization. The time for 'FAVORITE COACHES OR SCHOOLS must end. Until then there will never be a level playing field. To continue knowing those things would be an act of stupidity. All schools should insist on a NEW ORGANIZATION.[/quote]
IMO starting a new organization is exactly what the Super 5 conferences hope to do in the long run. Problem is, their goal is to dominate the college $port$ market, have complete autonomy in dealing with "student-athletes" and other issues however they wish to, and have zero interest in including other conferences, to the point of trying to crush them if necessary (see Coach K's comments the last time the ACC raided Big East basketball).[/quote]

You can take that out of the opinion column, you state fact; anyone who thinks otherwise is just kidding themselves.[/quote]

Logen, I added the "IMO" at the last moment, trying not to sound like I had inside information. But you're right, it's plain to see that if and when it happens the entire collegiate sports landscape will be changed dramatically and possibly irreparably, especially for conferences like the Big East. The idea of participating in a non-Super-5 NCAA tournament would almost certainly put an end to signing Top 100 talent.
 
Last edited:
[quote="redken" post=274410][quote="Logen" post=274379][quote="redken" post=274120][quote="frank61" post=273890]If the NCAA does the investigation, and does not treat all schools and coaches the same way, then it would be a great time to shred the organization and start with an entire new organization. The time for 'FAVORITE COACHES OR SCHOOLS must end. Until then there will never be a level playing field. To continue knowing those things would be an act of stupidity. All schools should insist on a NEW ORGANIZATION.[/quote]
IMO starting a new organization is exactly what the Super 5 conferences hope to do in the long run. Problem is, their goal is to dominate the college $port$ market, have complete autonomy in dealing with "student-athletes" and other issues however they wish to, and have zero interest in including other conferences, to the point of trying to crush them if necessary (see Coach K's comments the last time the ACC raided Big East basketball).[/quote]

You can take that out of the opinion column, you state fact; anyone who thinks otherwise is just kidding themselves.[/quote]

Logen, I added the "IMO" at the last moment, trying not to sound like I had inside information. But you're right, it's plain to see that if and when it happens the entire collegiate sports landscape will be changed dramatically and possibly irreparably, especially for conferences like the Big East. The idea of participating in a non-Super-5 NCAA tournament would almost certainly put an end to signing Top 100 talent.[/quote]

I hear you Redken, but doesn’t CBS have contract with the NCAA through 2022 to televise the NCAA Tournament for a ton of money? I would think that contract would keep things the way they are at least until that contract runs out.
 
The NCAA Tournament will be broadcast on CBS/Turner through 2032. The companies signed an eight-year, $8.8 billion extension with the NCAA for the broadcast rights to March Madness, putting the tournament's yearly TV value at over a billion dollars for the first time.
 
That’s a lot of money for even the power 5 conferences to walk away from. Plus FOX is a major player and has a contract with the Big East, Big Ten and PAC 12. A lot of major players and moving parts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top