The issue was only magnified now. All the facts were on the table 3 months ago as they are now. The same taxpayer argument and all that is true, I agree, but to me he should have chimed in back then. In my mind he is just as guilty as the others for him and/or his administration hoping it fell by the wayside.
If he didn't view the tape, like us, I'd say it's fair to change an opinion on this, no?
Yes. But maybe I'm naive to think someone in the state since they fund the school would have seen the tape when it first popped up. If not than Pernetti is a really big idiot as opposed to just an idiot.
That's what makes this so bizarre. More then Rice's maniacal style, why would Pernetti put himself in jeopardy by retaining him? Why wouldn't Barchi view the incident of his highest profile employee in Nov? Why not terminate Rice and make the tape available to the taxpayers in Dec?
Blaudschun answers it pretty well here:
http://ajerseyguy.com/?p=6391
"It would be interesting to know if anyone from the Big Ten knew if anything at all was going on with the Rutgers basketball program when the announcement was made on November 20th that Rutgers had been voted in as the 14th member of the conference.
It would be interesting to know that if the suspension to Rice had been revealed before the announcement of Rutgers approval in the conference, would the Big Ten schools have second thoughts about inviting the Scarlet Knightss.
By handing out a three-game suspension and leaving the reasons vague, the spotlight was brief. The college world quickly moved to other issues, especially during the height of the football bowl season."