I'd read this: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5845900/2024/10/28/mets-offseason-mlb-free-agency/Vientos, Mauricio and Acuna in the starting lineup helps the Mets (Cohen) salary wise and gives them a little breathing room to go after Soto.
Mets have $185 million coming off the books. They are $74 million under the initial luxury-tax threshold, and $114 million under the third.
I just don't think we should be worried about any financial flexibility if we sign Soto. We should just be going all-in for a 4-5 year window via trades and free agency. No stupid contracts like Marte, Diaz or McNeil, but re-sign Pete, take a gamble on an ace like Snell or Burnes, and another one on a guy like Buehler. Go after a guy like Crochett, Helsely, Devin Williams, etc. Stearns didn't draft or trade for any of our prospects, so maybe he doesn't really like them to begin with.
I couldn't find the quote, but I remember Cohen saying something along the lines of it doesn't make sense to be barely above the CBT/you might as well be way over.
If we don't sign Soto, I actually think we should re-set and try to stay under the CBT. Get creative and trade for one-year deals & guys under arbitration, see what our kids can do, etc.