It is our right as fans to post about what we see, hear, think and opine on in respect of the program, provided it is done within the forum rules, which by far the majority of posters comply with.
The coach was interviewed following the Marquette game and his response was ridiculous at best. He totally ignored our horrible porous defence which gave up 96 points , 53 of which came on the second half when we were in the game. He failed to mention that our défense lost the game for us. Typically when you score 94 points in college you come out on top. When you fail to address the issue often it is due to a lack of accountability.
As for his shortcomings where do we start Al :
1 Horrible défense
2 Horrible substitutions
3 Lack of player accountability
4 No half court offence
5 Average recruiting at best
6 Terrible defence of the 3 point shot
7 Complete mismanagement of Posh and Curbelo
8 Embarrassing advice given to players when the microphone was live, totally embarrassing, it pointed out the height of incompetence for many to see
9 Poor use of key personnel throughout the season
10 Terrible use of time outs and clock management
Do you really want me to continue Al ? Is that not enough in terms of shortcomings for a coach who played the game and following has been coaching for 40-41 years ?
And as I said earlier today I do not believe the board acts with a mob mentality, and that contrary to what our resident psychologist Fuschia, whom I have the greatest of respect for, has said. A few members may but certainly not the majority.
My response was to a post that said Anderson has not accepted resposibilities for his shortcomings. The oost made it sound like Anderson should agree with all the shortcomings listed in your post. Those shortcomings are your opinion and not necessarily the opinion of Anderson.
I agree with # 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, but that is my opinion, and again not necessarily Anderson's opinion. You may list more if you like. I will probably agree with you. As I have posted previously, I blame the coach and players equally for our lousy season.
Player shortcoming:
1. Can't shoot from 3 or mid-range jump shots.
2. Drive to the basket with their heads down and wind up not knowing where the defense is as the arrive for their shot.
3. Play horrible team defense.
4. Can't keep man in front of them in half-court defense.
5. Cheat too much on defense leading to easy baskets by opponents
6. Lose sight of their man leading to too many back door baskets by opponents.
7. Don't box out on defensive boards.
8. Consistently throw lazy passes.
9. Too much one on one hero ball.
10. Have extremely low basketball IQ's.
Do you really want me to continue? Is that not enough team/player shortcomings. Should the coach be held responsible for correcting these shortcomings? Sure, but up to a point.
And yes your opinion is in the majority, but that doesn't make it right.