It's a shame we have reached the point of making all sorts of calculations on what possible scenarios need to happen for us to get to the big dance. You have to win important games to be a contender and other than a nice win against Creighton and a must have win against G'town and Providence, it hasn't gotten done..
Weak O0C schedule and losses to Depaul and Providence hurt and not holding homecourt against Villanova and Xavier are why we are on the bubble, outside looking in. It would have helped immensely if we had beaten Creighton at Creighton. Close, it was..
A few years ago a 9-9 UCONN Team caught fire and won the BE on the way to the NCAA CHAMPIONSHIP.. We're not a NCAA championship Team but, we could surprise in the BE tourney but, this team hasn't shown much in big games so far. That's a fact.
Sometimes you have to step up. NOW , WOULD BE GOOD.
Not a weak out of conference schedule, Wisconsin, Syracuse are possibly going to be top 2 seeds, played an ACC team and Big 10 team.
TOP 2 SEEDS? Neither Wisc or Syracuse will be top 2 seeds at this point.. And, we lost to both..Also lost to a Big 10 doormat, Penn State.. Wagner, Longwood, Monmouth, Fordham are wins that don't help, other than to say "cupcake."
Thanks for putting it in caps, yes top 2 seeds, absolutely, Lunardi has them both as 2 seeds, they are both in top 6 in RPI. Negative posters keep saying 1-7 against 1-50, while factually accurate, the fair analysis is 1-5 against top 10, keep up with the negativity. Don't forget San Fran is at 70.
You can call posters "negative", I, OTOH, would consider myself more objective than negative.
Truth be told, had we taken care of business vs Penn State and DePaul, we wouldnt even be having the 1-5 vs the top 10 or 1-7 vs the top 50 conversation - we would be in the tournament at the moment with a chance to improve our seeding by beating Marquette and winning in the BET.
The structure of our schedule is set up where there are not a lot of top 50 games, and the ones that are, are, unfortunately, vs the top 10. Due to the lack of success in those games, that means there was very little margin for error in the remaining games, which means winning against depaul and PSU were absolute musts, and with our losses in those games, we have put ourselves on the outside of the NCAAs with a game vs Marquette that does nothing for us if we win but will just move us further down the ladder if we lose. What happens if we beat PC and Villanova in the Big East then lose to a Marquette team that got in the BET in the final? Do we get a bid then because we made it to the BET Title game?
Our OOC was maybe not "weak", but due to the split of the football schools from the old Big East, we are now playing against Creighton, Xavier & Butler instead of UConn, Pitt, ND, Louisville, Cincinnati, West Virginia. No disrespect to our new Big East representatives, but we do not get as many "quality" games (Top 50 games?). in 2010-11 we were 9-8 vs the top 50, so even with a loss to Fordham that season, we had such a padded resume', we can compensate for that loss with the top 50 record....not the case this season.
We just need to win the Big East. Its on our home court and none of these teams are unbeatable. We leave no doubts then.