Monte post=429066 said:
Moose post=429045 said:
What I just don't get is kids transfer and posters come out of the woodwork blaming the coach. Is the coach supposed to keep an unhappy kid around? Is coach supposed to start them as Seniors because they are Seniors? I wished Greg and Marcellus well. They gave us 3 years and want to try something else.
Funny how nobody blames kids for leaving, because they are 'kids', right? Can't have it both ways.
I don't hide in the woodwork. I have praised CMA plenty over the past 2 years, but how you and others can absolve him of blame for this mass exodus is beyond me. The buck stops with the coach, and while it's way to soon to pass judgement on next year's team, what's going on right now is extremely worrisome. And rest assured, if he does not replace the defectors with better players, we will once again be on the outside looking in on selection Sunday. And I'm sure if that happens, a lot of our fan base will blame the system and the kids who left as the reason.
You've been here all year. This week thought has been a blast from the past for me by quite a few.
But I still am not understanding your take. It's worrisome that 6 kids left. 2 didnt play a lick. 2 were hated by most of the fan base and 2 were fan favorites from the last coach who while contributors weren't going to start next year (their last year technically). I'd be more worried if a coach begged some of them to stay to have unhappy kids on the bench.
I was very critical of Anderson during the year. Mostly about his in game coaching, rotations, etc. In terms of roster management again call me crazy but if a kid wants to leave tough to beg them to return unless they are your top 3-4 players.
All valid points, but
-it's a coaches job to establish a connection with his players and get them to buy in to doing what's best for the team. It isn't always going to work, but it's got to work with most kids if a coach is going to be successful.
-CMA's system does not lend itself to high roster turnover
-Our program has been in rebuilding mode for years. CMA was supposed to be creating a new culture and establishing some stability. This "mass exodus"(as it was described in the Post) only lends itself to the perception that our program continues to be in shambles. Now, whether that's true or not is debatable, but the perception of it is not good for many reasons.
-Individually none of the departures is a huge loss, but collectively they are.
Again, if CMA goes out and gets better talent, and puts together a tournament team next year, then all will be forgotten. But that is a very tall task based on where we stand right now.
-