Former staff debate (from fall visit thread)

[quote="Amaseinyourface" post=358026][quote="Logen" post=358022][quote="Amaseinyourface" post=358018][quote="Logen" post=358015][quote="alexander salem" post=358007][quote="Logen" post=358000][quote="alexander salem" post=357987][quote="Logen" post=357972][quote="Rob" post=357970]Last time was early Lavin. Chiles was the horse, Rico was involved and Lavin was great at building relationships quickly and seemingly always in touch with tons of both top and attainable prospects. Dunlap wasn't, of course, but with Lavin bringing his A game we could get away with leaving Dunlap in the lab to run practices, game plans, etc.[/quote]

This staff has done more real recruiting in 5 months than Lavin or Mullin and their staffs did in 7-8 years.[/quote]

Lavin pulled in a top 3 class his first year. Mullin and Co. were also recruiting very aggressively the first few months they were hired (Rawle Alkins, Thon Maker, Heron as a HS Senior). Obviously we know how both regimes turned out. Let's stop trying to create a false narrative and give our current staff time before we start giving them all the accolades in the world. I am excited too but CMA is doing what every other D1 Coach does their first few months on the job.[/quote]

You know not of what you speak......no false narrative; neither Lavin nor Mullin had any recruiting strategy; never mind the implementation of one. Maybe for different reasons, neither laid the groundwork for recruiting sustainment and growth, hence the program under both went nowhere.
Anderson and team are out working their butts off laying that foundation, and yes it is what every D1 coach does and Anderson is doing it because he is a pro, Lavin and Mullin did not because they weren't. Maybe each or both had legitimate reasons but neither did "what every other D1 Coach does" and it showed.[/quote]

Hindsight Bias. You're letting the previous staff's years of failure affect what you thought of them when they first got hired.[/quote]

Huh?? Of course it is hindsight; how else do you judge someone's performance until after they have performed? I never read a concert review before the music stopped. For the record, I hated the Lavin hire and thought Mullin would eventually be an off the charts terrific coach when he was hired. Obviously he did not even begin to apply his legendary work ethic during his stay here. Just curious, so your point is no one should form an opinion different than the opinion they had before something starts, in this case a coaching tenure? It must be nice to be clairvoyant.[/quote]

I think his point is that for the first 5-6 months Mullin, and definitely Lavin, we’re busting their ass on the recruiting trail. It didn’t last. I have no reason to believe it won’t last with Anderson but I believe Alex is just suggesting to wait to see how our coaches work ethic is 3-4 years from now.[/quote]

His cracks about false narratives and hindsight bias is not making a legitimate point to me, and it is me he was addressing. MY point is that Anderson and company have not just "busted their butts" in the first 5 months for this year and 2020 but they are also actively and personally laying the groundwork for recruiting 2-4 years from now, something Lavin nor Mullin never did in their cumulative 7-8 years. NEVER....Anderson is a pro with a plan being implemented from jump street, Feel free to disagree but I know what I saw and I know what I see.[/quote]

Wasn’t attacking you. Now on I’ll remember never to jump into a discussion you’re having on a discussion board.[/quote]

Nonsense, of course you were. I came back at you, that's the way it works. Dinkins never passes up a chance to dig at me, he did it on this thread and that is fine, we have been doing it for years and we virtually never agree but I certainly respect the man. Would love to meet him, have a beer and go at it in person. I guarantee we would have some laughs.
 
One of the reasons I'm particularly optimistic about the future is because I get the sense Coach Anderson is on a mission here. He's a guy who has had success for awhile but I can't imagine he's thrilled with being let go from Arkansas. I'm not saying he was failure there (he made the tournament in 3 of his last 5 seasons including a sweet 16. That would make him the most successful coach we've had here in some time) but the fact remains that he was fired.

If he was just another guy coming in here to "rebuild St John's" "Change the culture" "Bring back the glory days", etc I'd be extremely skeptical. I believe in this guy because I think he has pride, work ethic and isn't used to being fired. He has something to prove. He's coaching to get his reputation back. I think a little selfish pride and desperation is GREAT for a career. We all must know how it's personally motivated us in the past. I think he's a guy with a winning track record who has a bit of a fire under his ass right now and is determined to remind everyone that he's a winner. I think we're fortunate that he fell into our laps and seems primed to use St John's as the vehicle to reaffirm his standing in the profession.
 
[quote="Jnaw17" post=358023]
These clarifications help, but the point is lost on me. Coach Anderson has been doing this for 17 years successfully. He’s doing here what he’s done in the past. No reason to believe you have to wait 3-4 more years to see him do exactly what he’s done in the past to ensure his success.[/quote]

If anything, he might work even harder because of a possible chip on his shoulder from being let go by his dream job.

*Whoops, probably should have read the post right before mine.
 
Last edited:
[quote="L J S A" post=358035][quote="Jnaw17" post=358023]
These clarifications help, but the point is lost on me. Coach Anderson has been doing this for 17 years successfully. He’s doing here what he’s done in the past. No reason to believe you have to wait 3-4 more years to see him do exactly what he’s done in the past to ensure his success.[/quote]

If anything, he might work even harder because of a possible chip on his shoulder from being let go by his dream job.

*Whoops, probably should have read the post right before mine.[/quote]

Well, great minds such as ours...
 
[quote="Amaseinyourface" post=358026][quote="Logen" post=358022][quote="Amaseinyourface" post=358018][quote="Logen" post=358015][quote="alexander salem" post=358007][quote="Logen" post=358000][quote="alexander salem" post=357987][quote="Logen" post=357972][quote="Rob" post=357970]Last time was early Lavin. Chiles was the horse, Rico was involved and Lavin was great at building relationships quickly and seemingly always in touch with tons of both top and attainable prospects. Dunlap wasn't, of course, but with Lavin bringing his A game we could get away with leaving Dunlap in the lab to run practices, game plans, etc.[/quote]

This staff has done more real recruiting in 5 months than Lavin or Mullin and their staffs did in 7-8 years.[/quote]

Lavin pulled in a top 3 class his first year. Mullin and Co. were also recruiting very aggressively the first few months they were hired (Rawle Alkins, Thon Maker, Heron as a HS Senior). Obviously we know how both regimes turned out. Let's stop trying to create a false narrative and give our current staff time before we start giving them all the accolades in the world. I am excited too but CMA is doing what every other D1 Coach does their first few months on the job.[/quote]

You know not of what you speak......no false narrative; neither Lavin nor Mullin had any recruiting strategy; never mind the implementation of one. Maybe for different reasons, neither laid the groundwork for recruiting sustainment and growth, hence the program under both went nowhere.
Anderson and team are out working their butts off laying that foundation, and yes it is what every D1 coach does and Anderson is doing it because he is a pro, Lavin and Mullin did not because they weren't. Maybe each or both had legitimate reasons but neither did "what every other D1 Coach does" and it showed.[/quote]

Hindsight Bias. You're letting the previous staff's years of failure affect what you thought of them when they first got hired.[/quote]

Huh?? Of course it is hindsight; how else do you judge someone's performance until after they have performed? I never read a concert review before the music stopped. For the record, I hated the Lavin hire and thought Mullin would eventually be an off the charts terrific coach when he was hired. Obviously he did not even begin to apply his legendary work ethic during his stay here. Just curious, so your point is no one should form an opinion different than the opinion they had before something starts, in this case a coaching tenure? It must be nice to be clairvoyant.[/quote]

I think his point is that for the first 5-6 months Mullin, and definitely Lavin, we’re busting their ass on the recruiting trail. It didn’t last. I have no reason to believe it won’t last with Anderson but I believe Alex is just suggesting to wait to see how our coaches work ethic is 3-4 years from now.[/quote]

His cracks about false narratives and hindsight bias is not making a legitimate point to me, and it is me he was addressing. MY point is that Anderson and company have not just "busted their butts" in the first 5 months for this year and 2020 but they are also actively and personally laying the groundwork for recruiting 2-4 years from now, something Lavin nor Mullin never did in their cumulative 7-8 years. NEVER....Anderson is a pro with a plan being implemented from jump street, Feel free to disagree but I know what I saw and I know what I see.[/quote];)

Wasn’t attacking you. Now on I’ll remember never to jump into a discussion you’re having on a discussion board.[/quote]

I guess I lost track of who I was responding to but whatever and whoever; read respond or not to my posts. I enjoy the back and forth and combativeness and generally don’t take it personal....generally.
 
Anderson has a great record of winning. When he came here, he said he wanted to win a national championship right off the bat and I believe that. I think you have to have goals like that when relocating to a foreign place like nyc for a job. I think we all want Mike Anderson’s legacy to be as a St. John’s coach, not Arkansas etc. I think he’s hungry to do the same.
 
[quote="Logen" post=358030]Nonsense, of course you were. I came back at you, that's the way it works. Dinkins never passes up a chance to dig at me, he did it on this thread and that is fine, we have been doing it for years and we virtually never agree but I certainly respect the man. Would love to meet him, have a beer and go at it in person. I guarantee we would have some laughs.[/quote]

Wheat beer, dark ales, porters and stouts. Thank you! Sorry, maher.... IPA's are too hoppy, lol.
 
[quote="MCNPA" post=358043]Anderson has a great record of winning. When he came here, he said he wanted to win a national championship right off the bat and I believe that. I think you have to have goals like that when relocating to a foreign place like nyc for a job. I think we all want Mike Anderson’s legacy to be as a St. John’s coach, not Arkansas etc. I think he’s hungry to do the same.[/quote]

17yrs being head coach and never a losing season is freaking awesome, but until he gets that nc, there will always be something missing.
Well the first thing you gotta do is hit a hr with hire a staff, I believe he did that when hiring his assistants.
Next thing to do is target the recruits that you identify can thrive is your system and go after them. Lastly is the waiting game, see who come es and who doesn't.
Will he win that nc here, who know, only time will tell, but him and staff are hustling baby, and it's damn good to see after the last 2 head coaches.
 
[quote="oldschool Redmen" post=358101][quote="MCNPA" post=358043]Anderson has a great record of winning. When he came here, he said he wanted to win a national championship right off the bat and I believe that. I think you have to have goals like that when relocating to a foreign place like nyc for a job. I think we all want Mike Anderson’s legacy to be as a St. John’s coach, not Arkansas etc. I think he’s hungry to do the same.[/quote]

17yrs being head coach and never a losing season is freaking awesome, but until he gets that nc, there will always be something missing.
Well the first thing you gotta do is hit a hr with hire a staff, I believe he did that when hiring his assistants.
Next thing to do is target the recruits that you identify can thrive is your system and go after them. Lastly is the waiting game, see who come es and who doesn't.
Will he win that nc here, who know, only time will tell, but him and staff are hustling baby, and it's damn good to see after the last 2 head coaches.[/quote]

The last 2 head coaches?
The last decent coach we had was Frannie about 25 years ago
It's been one nightmare after another since then
It looks like our luck may have changed for the better this time around!!
 
Except maybe for Norm, and maybe including Norm, we were enthused about every single hire at this point in their tenure.

Fran is only thought highly of, as in the poem, Ode to an Athlete Dying Young.

"Now you will not swell the rout
Of lads that wore their honours out,
Runners whom renown outran
And the name died before the man."

Every single coach flamed out.

I think of the never had a losing record thing as overblown. Its a matter of never being left high and dry, often by transfer or declaring for the draft. Some HOF coaches have had that scenario, and quickly rebuilt. All it means is that year to year he had the good fortune even in a down year of having enough by not losing players unexpectedly to the draft or transfer.

Certainly there are lots of good signs. But we have never hesitated to crap on one of our coaches at the first sign of bad weather. If 30 seasons and 6 coaches post Carnesecca (and guaranteed we'd crap on Lou for all those NCAA one and dones) have taught us is to be cautiously optimistic until we prove ourselves on the court.

Until then our ardent fans should simply support the hell out of this years team by their attendance.
 
Good post! We should by now all be cautiously optimistic
Like what I hear and the hard wrk but let’s see what he does with the team before we say how great he has done
 
[quote="BOB BARKER" post=358114]THE LAST DECENT COACH WAS JARVIS...WHO COULD COACH WITH FRAN'S RECRUITS BUT COULD NOT GET HIS OWN[/quote]

CAN YOU PLEASE STOP WITH THE ALL CAPS.:p
 
Those with real insight into the SJU program since Louie retired can cite serious shortcomings in ALL our subsequent coaches, from Mahoney through Mullin. Certainly the results during those decades speak for themselves. Anderson’s results remain to be seen, and SJU fans certainly have earned the right to have a “show me” skepticism, but the professionalism he and staff have brought is already “up front for everyone to see” evident from real, sincere PR to a commitment level to recruiting expected and required at this level. IMO, only two of those previous coaches brought their A game to SJU, Mahoney and Roberts, and neither of those A games were remotely good enough, each an understandable but poor hire. From FF lobbying for other jobs, etc. to Mullin’s laissez faire coaching “style” everyone else was just “stealing money” in a way.
 
[quote="Logen" post=358144]Those with real insight into the SJU program since Louie retired can cite serious shortcomings in ALL our subsequent coaches, from Mahoney through Mullin. Certainly the results during those decades speak for themselves. Anderson’s results remain to be seen, and SJU fans certainly have earned the right to have a “show me” skepticism, but the professionalism he and staff have brought is already “up front for everyone to see” evident from real, sincere PR to a commitment level to recruiting expected and required at this level. IMO, only two of those previous coaches brought their A game to SJU, Mahoney and Roberts, and neither of those A games were remotely good enough, each an understandable but poor hire. From FF lobbying for other jobs, etc. to Mullin’s laissez faire coaching “style” everyone else was just “stealing money” in a way.[/quote]

There is a BIG difference with the Mullin hire then the others. Mullin's status at the school prior to his hire was FAR different than any of the other hires. And that is why his hire was treated far differently. And that is what made is failure and more importantly his lack of work towards potentially succeeding after his initial months on the job that much more disappointing. And made it that much harder to figure out a way to move on without making him look bad.
 
[quote="Logen" post=358144]Those with real insight into the SJU program since Louie retired can cite serious shortcomings in ALL our subsequent coaches, from Mahoney through Mullin. Certainly the results during those decades speak for themselves. Anderson’s results remain to be seen, and SJU fans certainly have earned the right to have a “show me” skepticism, but the professionalism he and staff have brought is already “up front for everyone to see” evident from real, sincere PR to a commitment level to recruiting expected and required at this level. IMO, only two of those previous coaches brought their A game to SJU, Mahoney and Roberts, and neither of those A games were remotely good enough, each an understandable but poor hire. From FF lobbying for other jobs, etc. to Mullin’s laissez faire coaching “style” everyone else was just “stealing money” in a way.[/quote]

I think it’s Dylan’s line “There’s no success like failure and failure ‘s. No success at all.” It wasn’t just Lavin personal travails, nor Chris’s. Hope you enjoyed NY Coach Dunlap and welcome home “Slice”. Cragg May be able to finally put in place some system maintenance.
 
[quote="alexander salem" post=357987][quote="Logen" post=357972][quote="Rob" post=357970]Last time was early Lavin. Chiles was the horse, Rico was involved and Lavin was great at building relationships quickly and seemingly always in touch with tons of both top and attainable prospects. Dunlap wasn't, of course, but with Lavin bringing his A game we could get away with leaving Dunlap in the lab to run practices, game plans, etc.[/quote]

This staff has done more real recruiting in 5 months than Lavin or Mullin and their staffs did in 7-8 years.[/quote]

Lavin pulled in a top 3 class his first year. Mullin and Co. were also recruiting very aggressively the first few months they were hired (Rawle Alkins, Thon Maker, Heron as a HS Senior). Obviously we know how both regimes turned out. Let's stop trying to create a false narrative and give our current staff time before we start giving them all the accolades in the world. I am excited too but CMA is doing what every other D1 Coach does their first few months on the job.[/quote]

That's one way to look at it. The other is that CMA and his staff are doing precisely what their track record says they will do. That they are grinding it out every day and utilizing the entire staff to recruit in a coordinated, all hands on deck/team style.

Mullin had two guys on staff with recruiting experience and lost one of them right out of the gate because he couldn't mange the egos of two alpha recruiters. The question with them after 4 months on the job wasn't if they were working hard during the "honeymoon phase" of their tenure (everyone does), but just how long they would keep it up. Rhorssen leaving so quickly answered that question loud and clear, even if people weren't quite willing to listen to that message just yet.

Based on CMA's career arc, management style and achievements you know exactly what you are getting from him on a day to day basis. The question wasn't how hard this staff would work, or how long they would put in that effort. It was whether or not he'd get traction locally, and the results needed to succeed in NY. Something they seem to have already done.

You want to wait 6 months to see if a guy who has had an unflinching work ethic his whole coaching career still has an unflinching work ethic? If you'd been paying attention to our last staff ,and to this new one, you'd know that it won't be news if in 6 months CMA and this staff are still working their asses off...it will be news if they aren't.

To recap:

We fired a staff that had no resume and didn't do much of anything, let alone recruiting.
We hired a new HC with an impeccable resume, work ethic and history of success on and off the court.
He hired a bunch of good/excellent recruiters.
They are out doing what they do and having some immediate success...
And you want to wait to see if they still have the same work ethic and effort in 6 months?

Past performance may not be indicative of future results in the stock market, but it definitely is when assessing a persons prospective job performance. CMA will ultimately be judged by his ability to land enough quality recruits to win games. That is something that will be proven out over time. Whether or not he's going to put in the long term effort needed to get those recruits and win those games really isn't debatable. There's nothing in his career that indicates he's suddenly going to stop doing what he's always done from an effort standpoint. Nothing. So until you have evidence that is the case, I think most of us are going o give him the benefit of the doubt on that front, even if you aren't. Quite frankly, he's earned that much.
 
[quote="BOB BARKER" post=358114]THE LAST DECENT COACH WAS JARVIS...WHO COULD COACH WITH FRAN'S RECRUITS BUT COULD NOT GET HIS OWN[/quote]

JARVIS WAS A GOOD COACH. BUT ITS DAMN HARD TO RECRUIT FROM THE CHEAP SEATS AT BELMONT.
 
[quote="Section9" post=358123][quote="BOB BARKER" post=358114]THE LAST DECENT COACH WAS JARVIS...WHO COULD COACH WITH FRAN'S RECRUITS BUT COULD NOT GET HIS OWN[/quote]

CAN YOU PLEASE STOP WITH THE ALL CAPS.:p[/quote]

PERHAPS IF WE ALL START POSTING IN ALL CAPS HE'LL GO TO LOWER CASE TO STAND OUT AGAIN.
 
[quote="fordham96" post=358149][quote="Logen" post=358144]Those with real insight into the SJU program since Louie retired can cite serious shortcomings in ALL our subsequent coaches, from Mahoney through Mullin. Certainly the results during those decades speak for themselves. Anderson’s results remain to be seen, and SJU fans certainly have earned the right to have a “show me” skepticism, but the professionalism he and staff have brought is already “up front for everyone to see” evident from real, sincere PR to a commitment level to recruiting expected and required at this level. IMO, only two of those previous coaches brought their A game to SJU, Mahoney and Roberts, and neither of those A games were remotely good enough, each an understandable but poor hire. From FF lobbying for other jobs, etc. to Mullin’s laissez faire coaching “style” everyone else was just “stealing money” in a way.[/quote]

There is a BIG difference with the Mullin hire then the others. Mullin's status at the school prior to his hire was FAR different than any of the other hires. And that is why his hire was treated far differently. And that is what made is failure and more importantly his lack of work towards potentially succeeding after his initial months on the job that much more disappointing. And made it that much harder to figure out a way to move on without making him look bad.[/quote]

I understand, but frankly, he made himself look bad. Not succeeding IMO is very forgivable, not working, not so much. I understand the possible familial extenuating circumstances to a degree but if you can't do the job, you have to resign citing those extenuating circumstances.
 
Back
Top