Back to Mussini. I think one of the reasons we, as an avid fan base, latch onto guys like Mussini and others is the fact that it had been so long since we had anyone who could knock down 3s. So, when recruits come along that show any signs that they may fill the void we "adopt" them and hope beyond hope that they live up to the potential.
That said, seems like a good kid and has definitely had his moments - good and bad.
I agree that he seems like a good kid and I wish him no harm and think he should get the same opportunity that similar player - eg Heath Orvis and Liam Beasty - got. But I think that the reason that we adopt him is that we identify with him: like most of us he's slow, white and not very good at basketball.
Or we adopted him because he played his butt off last year, out of position, didn't whine or bitch, just played hard as he could for us? Bringing up his name with Orvis and Beasty is wrong.
I don't get the hate fest. Kid is shooting over 40 percent from three and is by all accounts a greate teammate and representative of the university. Nothing wrong with having a specialist. If he's forced to do too much, that's a reflection of the state of the program.
I dont remember Beasty, but Mussini is much better that Fred Lyson, Sergio Luyk, Heath Orvis, Max Hooper, Marc-Antoine Bourgault or any of those other stiffs we've recruited who came in with the reputation of being a "pure shooter."