It's a real slippery slope........Our administration no doubt knows why the grades did not get them over the hump, but I
think they are between a rock and a hard place. They have to be careful not to violate privacy issues of the 3 men involved. I think eventually we will get some carefully laundered explaination as to why they did not qualify. Our spokesman seemed so certain all of them would be here. very odd.,,,,,,
If what we've been reading is true, our spokesmen had every reason to be certain all would be here - likely they got an early heads up from the school that all three had PASSED all of their summer school classes, which is what was believed to be what was required. The situation is apparently no longer that the students didn't complete the requirments for acceptance, but that an arbitrary decision has been made by the clearinghouse not to accept those completed requirements.
This is all very "deja vu" for folks who have followed the Clearinghouse's dealings with Steve Lavin recruits since 1997 - McDonalds All Americans Schea Cotton in 97 and Evan Burns 5 years later. Completed all their requirements, actually enrolled in school, and the Cleariinghouse refused to accept portions of their quailfying transcripts - for Cotton it was an SAT test that he was (under a Dr's certification of a reading disorder) allowed extra time to complete his SAT test (fully accepted by the SAT administrators), and a Core english class in high school for Burns that was "questioned" by the clearinghouse, even tho they'd accepted the exact same course form the same school, same teacher for 11 other D-1 athletes over the previous 5 years.
In both cases, the Clearing house was proved wrong - AFTER the players had to elect to attend a different school. For Burns, the class was magically accepted after he re-entrolled at San Diego State to play for Steve Fisher (UCLA didn't accept partial qualifiers, so couldn't fund his scholarship - SDSU did).
In Coltton's case, it was proven in the courts that the Clearinghouse had no right to challenge the SAT result. But it took Schea and his family and a bevy of lawyers over 2 years (and a total of 3 universities) before he was allowed to play.
I often wonder, since the Cotton thing was finally completed well before Burns left high school, if Steve Lavin's support for the Cotton's lawsuit (I believe he testified for Schea in both the original case, and again in the two appleals filed by the NCAA after Schea won in court each time) didn't have something to do with the entire Burns situation and it's "magical" resolution.
Conspiracy theorist that I am (Grassy knoll, anyone?), I wonder if it doesn't have anything to do with THIS situation....