One plays against cupcakes, the other against the best.
Let's see McCallum drop 23 and go 5-9 from 3 pt range against Syracuse.
Let's see McCallum drop 23 and go 5-9 from 3 pt range against Syracuse.
Dinkins, it is indisputable fact that Harrison is #40 and McCallum is #43 on rivals. Go look.
False. Harrison is ranked better.
Harrison: 40 in nation
McCallum: 43rd
Dinkins, it is indisputable fact that Harrison is #40 and McCallum is #43 on rivals. Go look.
So, is Rivals totally the undisputed gospel when it comes to rankings? I'm not gonna take one particular recruiting site rankings, and use one AND only one when it comes to citing who's rated higher or not. It's best to take a cumulative of rankings when basing who's ranked higher or not.
Per the RSCI (which, is a combination of recruitnik's rankings), McCallum was the higher rated player, amongst him and Harrison, when they both came out of their respective classes.
http://rscihoops.com/
One plays against cupcakes, the other against the best.
One plays against cupcakes, the other against the best.
So what does that say about a kid like CJ McCollum from Lehigh?
Your analogies hold no weight. For the last time, stop looking at recruit rankings and player conferences to determine who should win a game and who are better players.
Austour...I'm referencing Rivals. You are referencing another scouting service. That means neither is correct and we are offering the same thing in essence. Unless the one you mentioned is a composite of ALL the services.
Austour...I'm referencing Rivals. You are referencing another scouting service. That means neither is correct and we are offering the same thing in essence. Unless the one you mentioned is a composite of ALL the services.
If you didn't know that you should really start picking your battles on these sites. Start with Old Red, Bobre45 and Dee, and then work your way up.
Austour...I'm referencing Rivals. You are referencing another scouting service. That means neither is correct and we are offering the same thing in essence. Unless the one you mentioned is a composite of ALL the services.
You better call Rivals up and tell them they don't know crap. Maybe you can get a job there since you clearly have the truth and they don't. I've never heard anyone use RSCI in the mainstream...it's Rivals and ESPN usually. Also, if your intent is to teach someone something, the whole approach of being a complete douchebag isn't that effective. Is it so hard to say "Yes, rivals rankings are included in the RSCI" instead of "OMG you are so dumb, pick your battles you fool. Detroit is like #10 in the nation!"?
Would you have preferred 1:30pm?I dont understand the start time of this game - weekday at 2