@Connecticut, Sat., Dec. 23, 8p, FOX

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think both Lavin and Mullin sucked as coaches but it is funny to me Mullin’s lack of effort is vilified, which is valid; while Lavin’s laziness is excused. Neither remotely put in the effort necessary to do the job they were paid for.
 
I think both Lavin and Mullin sucked as coaches but it is funny to me Mullin’s lack of effort is vilified, which is valid; while Lavin’s laziness is excused. Neither remotely put in the effort necessary to do the job they were paid for.
agree neither put in enough work ( Lavin did in the beginning ) but with Lavin I think some of us kinda think cancer, father dying getting divorced we kinda have a soft spot for whereas one of the smartest and best and most hard working players ever we don't see a valid excuse
 
Hollywood and Legend obviously > Norm and Cfc. I have no idea what went on behind the scenes but laziness seems like a very subjective and difficult to measure criteria. Even if the good 2 spent everyday at the racetrack and the bad 2 spent all day digging ditches, the good 2 were superior and deserve praise for it while the bad 2 deserve to get dumped on. Results are all that matter. And since one was Chris Mullin, that deserves a whole other level of praise.
 
agree neither put in enough work ( Lavin did in the beginning ) but with Lavin I think some of us kinda think cancer, father dying getting divorced we kinda have a soft spot for whereas one of the smartest and best and most hard working players ever we don't see a valid excuse
And Mullin’s situation with his brother‘s illness and subsequent death, his families unhappiness after moving from California to New York and returning to California don’t count. Like I said, empathy for Lavin, vilification for Mullin. One set of life’s challenges can’t count while another one does, in my mind, it doesn’t work that way.
I personally know of two times Lavin blew off scheduled workouts for HS players in NJ HIS administrators set up to go to social events in NY, calling them off at the latest possible moment. I went after Lavin big time on this board during the end of his tenure here because he was as phony as the proverbial three dollar bill. As phony as his mentor, John Wooden.
Taking a paycheck and not doing the work is stealing, and I paint both of them with that brush. If you can’t do the job, for whatever reason, leave.
 
Last edited:
Ponds lackluster final year here I think lingers in everyones mind. Thats why he doesnt get the props.

Big game tomorrow night. Real excited for this one. If Clingan is out, we have a shot here. Lets do it!!
Compare Shamorie's third year stats to Champs who everyone loves. Ponds also made the NCAA that last year. They aren't lackluster. I agree he doesn't get his due.

 
Compare Shamorie's third year stats to Champs who everyone loves. Ponds also made the NCAA that last year. They aren't lackluster. I agree he doesn't get his due.

I have no beef with Ponds, he was a terrific player for the Johnnie's, as was Champagnie. My reply has nothing to do with them but rather the use of stats only to judge players. A prime example for me is AJ Storr who I was not a big fan of as a player, because I felt he did little on the court if he wasn’t shooting. My initial opinion of Dingle is much the same although he certainly appears to be trying to expand his influence on a game in other ways; that is a very tough thing to do after years of playing one way, and I admire him greatly for that. No sulking, no chemistry upsetting, just, ok, I will TRY.
But I digress and now will enter into an area of hypocrisy, the use of stats. I have not seen Storr play for Wisconsin but it would APPEAR from his stats that he plays that same score or nothing game and that may very well be EXACTLY what Wisconsin needs from him, he might have found the perfect fit and great for him. I know he is a quality person and I will always root for those guys. But, IF true, emphasis on IF, his game IMO would not have fit into Pitino’s system, he would have had to change and expand.
I work with $ numbers all the time managing my business and I insist they be used for analysis, to ask the right questions and to make course corrections or apply lessons learned to other projects, etc. if required, Not as a static end all and be all unto themselves. I have had project teams who lost money but did a terrific job holding that number as low as possible because of things beyond their control and conversely, teams that turned a profit that could have been higher if they didn’t sit back basking in their “success”.
I feel the same way about using stats to judge players. It is interesting bar talk and all, for sure, but the only real way to judge a player is the eye test. Alleyne is a perfect example of that, so is Taylor.
 
I have no beef with Ponds, he was a terrific player for the Johnnie's, as was Champagnie. My reply has nothing to do with them but rather the use of stats only to judge players. A prime example for me is AJ Storr who I was not a big fan of as a player, because I felt he did little on the court if he wasn’t shooting. My initial opinion of Dingle is much the same although he certainly appears to be trying to expand his influence on a game in other ways; that is a very tough thing to do after years of playing one way, and I admire him greatly for that. No sulking, no chemistry upsetting, just, ok, I will TRY.
But I digress and now will enter into an area of hypocrisy, the use of stats. I have not seen Storr play for Wisconsin but it would APPEAR from his stats that he plays that same score or nothing game and that may very well be EXACTLY what Wisconsin needs from him, he might have found the perfect fit and great for him. I know he is a quality person and I will always root for those guys. But, IF true, emphasis on IF, his game IMO would not have fit into Pitino’s system, he would have had to change and expand.
I work with $ numbers all the time managing my business and I insist they be used for analysis, to ask the right questions and to make course corrections or apply lessons learned to other projects, etc. if required, Not as a static end all and be all unto themselves. I have had project teams who lost money but did a terrific job holding that number as low as possible because of things beyond their control and conversely, teams that turned a profit that could have been higher if they didn’t sit back basking in their “success”.
I feel the same way about using stats to judge players. It is interesting bar talk and all, for sure, but the only real way to judge a player is the eye test. Alleyne is a perfect example of that, so is Taylor.
That's fair but what was your eye test of Ponds?
 
There has been some chatter on here that Traore seems to be taken some of Zuby’s time lately. That is not accurate. Zuby subs in for Joel at the 5 exclusively. Drissa comes in for Ledlum except when we decide to go ”small” and go with two Small Forwards or three guards and a Small Forward. The only time Drissa comes in to play center is if Zuby is in foul trouble and Joel is also in foul trouble or needs a breather.

Drissa received more minutes against Xavier as Chris ran into a hard pick and went to the bench for awhile to shake it off. Drissa is playing well and neither he or Zuby are not being over exposed. As they get more and more comfortable, hopefully that we mean some more rest time for Joel and Chris.

Stay within striking distance with four minutes to go tomorrow and anything can happen.
I agree. When I saw those comments I thought I missed something the other night.
 
I thought Ponds was a terrific offensive player, good on defense, certainly far from afraid of the moment. I thought he could have been in better shape but could have been wrong, that is mostly based on things I heard from people I respect but I don’t know if it was true.
My only knock on him is that I thought he tried to change his on court persona to become more of a pure point guard his senior year, I imagine looking toward the NBA. Not unusual at all for players to do that after getting feedback after their junior year.
But all in all a terrific college player, borderline AA, a little too small without world class quickness for the NBA though.
 
Last edited:
He wasn't good at being a HC, we all know that. The biggest mistakes in my opinion were, 1) hiring Richmond and 2) not getting between whatever the frick allegedly went bad between Matt and Slice.
Your point 2 is honest. « whatever the frick happened between Matt and Slice. « You acknowledge that you don’t know. For the 1000 th time nothing happened between Matt and Slice and for people to keep bringing up Matts name in connection with Slices departure is just unfair to Matt and tarnishes his good name.
Slice left because of a disagreement between himself and Mullin, no more no less, which had zero to do with Matt.
It is more than time for posters to accept that.
Matt has worked ever since the incident and was brought back to his Alma mater, Slice to my knowledge has not.
 
And Mullin’s situation with his brother‘s illness and subsequent death, his families unhappiness after moving from California to New York and returning to California don’t count. Like I said, empathy for Lavin, vilification for Mullin. One set of life’s challenges can’t count while another one does, in my mind, it doesn’t work that way.
I personally know of two times Lavin blew off scheduled workouts for HS players in NJ HIS administrators set up to go to social events in NY, calling them off at the latest possible moment. I went after Lavin big time on this board during the end of his tenure here because he was as phony as the proverbial three dollar bill. As phony as his mentor, John Wooden.
Taking a paycheck and not doing the work is stealing, and I paint both of them with that brush. If you can’t do the job, for whatever reason, leave.
Who cares? A coach should be judged by the results on the court. Neither got it done but Lavin was much more successful here and we obviously would’ve been better off keeping him at the time (which isn’t just hindsight, many were against that decision).

I really don’t know how anyone can argue that 2 tourney appearances in 5 years (and another 2 NITs) at St. John’s didn’t deserve a paycheck. Look at the recent history of this program.
 
Your point 2 is honest. « whatever the frick happened between Matt and Slice. « You acknowledge that you don’t know. For the 1000 th time nothing happened between Matt and Slice and for people to keep bringing up Matts name in connection with Slices departure is just unfair to Matt and tarnishes his good name.
Slice left because of a disagreement between himself and Mullin, no more no less, which had zero to do with Matt.
It is more than time for posters to accept that.
Matt has worked ever since the incident and was brought back to his Alma mater, Slice to my knowledge has not.
Appreciate your response. I don't verify every rumor especially sensitive ones. Matt is a good guy and very hard worker. He even came to Novitas and explained NIL to the guys.
 
agree neither put in enough work ( Lavin did in the beginning ) but with Lavin I think some of us kinda think cancer, father dying getting divorced we kinda have a soft spot for whereas one of the smartest and best and most hard working players ever we don't see a valid excuse
Mike to be fair they both suffered tragedies while coaching at SJU. Lavin’s dad died at 83 after living what seemed to be a very nice life. Mullins brother got sick in his 50s and passed away. Not comparing, as a loss of a family member is a loss, but it seems both suffered great tragedies while coaching at SJU.
Bottom line is many like myself believed the BS as we knew Mullin the player, having watched him play for 4 years, having watched him work out morning day and night 365 days a year, believed he had the keys to every gym in the city and would put the same effort into coaching as he did in playing. Fact is, and for whatever reason, he didn’t come close to putting in the effort required to succeed at SJU.
Lavin had zero ties to SJU, Chris had the greatest of ties, we believed he came home to make us great and not just to collect a large pay cheque. Chris’s lack of effort hurts much more than that of Lavin.
Sorry Carmine but that’s the way I see it.
 
Rick after tomorrow night's W
View attachment 1673
Mullin stole money from the school. Hindsight is 20-20 but Lavin should have never have been let go. Doesn’t matter now we have RP if he can’t resurrect this program then no one can.
This mess all started with Louie selfishly retiring. If he was still coaching we could have avoided the last 20+ years of misery.
 
hard to believe it’s 30 yrs since coach retired. Thought he’d stay for his 25th yr He was still young
There is a great interview with Coach K on Max with Chris Wallace. He said he loved coaching and the games were no problem, but he started to dread all the prep work before games, watching tape, learning what other teams do and preparing to stop them, identifying weaknesses, etc. That's the reason he knew it was time to go.

It appears CRP still has that drive and work ethic. He's in great health and works out. He loves it all (coaching), says it's the only thing he really loves to do, but also knows he may not feel that way forever.

I would guess that Looie at 67, knew it was time. He could have been nudged, but likely not.
 
Below is a link to a scouting report for this evenings game that appears on UConn’s fan website. Note the classy thing the author wrote about Brady Dunlap.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top