I'm shocked at how many people have such low expectations for the program. Or how many people see "20 wins" and no farther.
We see the risk involved in replacing coaching staffs. We saw what SHU did when they were not satisfied with just making the dance. Two coaches later they have two NIT's in nine seasons. That's what their two "up and coming coaches" have produced - in addition to more off the court trouble than this program has ever had.
We also know that coaches do not bang down the door to come here. In the two previous searches it was becoming an embarrassment. In the last search NY talk radio picked this up and spoke loudly questioning why anyone would consider a "small school in Queens" as our former coach incorrectly referred to SJU.
Why are you so confident that five years later it will be any different?
I have little confidence that Miller or either Hurley would take this job over the many others that will be coming their way. I am not even confident that if they landed this job they would succeed.
Next year is a down year. Wright has had a losing season while retooling. The year after we should be back in good shape in the top half of the league again.
Extend him - load it with incentives and hopefully a buy out that the school can afford.
See Jack Williams post above, which is a partial answer to your question.
Lavin's teams play awful basketball. He is a terrible tactician, which is exacerbated by his inability to make in-game adjustments and his mind boggling substitution patterns. This year he avoided the latter problem by constructing a team with no subs -or at least none he chose to use.
His vaunted recruiting had consisted of two one-and-dones who are now marginal NBA players, a dozen players who were ineligible, transferred, etc, and zero program building. We will be starting next year with Alibegovic, Delarosa, and Balamou. Oh, and Christian Jones. Good luck with that.
Even if by some stroke of "luck" the two head cases who have remaining eligibility return, it will only be because they didn't have any better options. And it will still put the team in the bottom half of the league next year.
I can't imagine more haphazard, disorganized, unintelligent approach to constructing a Division 1 basketball program.
I can only imagine that those who want Lavin to return are either undisturbed by the terrible product Lavin has put on the floor for the past 5 years (and they should watch some of the tournament to see how real basketball is played, there is a lot of it to see) or are still using the Norm years as their barometer, which in my opinion is misguided.
Bottom line is that he wins 63% over 12 years of coaching in the most competitive conferences. I hear the coaches sitting 200 feet away from the bench after every loss. I also see them scratching their heads when this coach beats a Chris Mack twice in a row. Every coach has his negatives and positives, but at the end of the day they are judged by their record. His record is as good as most of the coaches his detractors envy and his players graduate - look it up.
The vocal minority on this board may get what they want. They may regret what they wish for. Just as the many SHU fans regret what they got back in 2005.