Penders on a roll
I am just stunned Penders is still with us, since he replaced Abe Vigoda in most death pools.
Penders on a roll
I get the feeling that they use the various “metrics” to muddy the water so to speak.I had noticed this in a prior post and it is the only metric in which Virginia was ahead of the BE teams. I did not look at the other marginal teams but its use does seem to line up with the committee's choices.
Oddly, the committee has not (thus far) pointed to KPI as a basis for its decision instead of mouthing insubstantial rationalizations. I wonder if the reason is that while teams had notice (clearly falsely) that NET mattered, I am not aware of anyone ever saying that KPI was the relevant metric. So if in fact that committee used KPI it can't say so because that would amount to a bait-and-switch.
Personally, this is the first time in my long life of watching basketball that I think the committee's choices were heavily influenced by political considerations, and if they used KPI it was only to justify doing what they wanted to do. There have been some controversial decisions in the past but I always felt those had some basketball logic to them and they often played out in a way that justified the committee's decision.
Possibly Virginia and a couple of other teams will live up to that standard and make the committee look good in the end, but it is not a good look.
I am just stunned Penders is still with us, since he replaced Abe Vigoda in most death pools.
That’s why I said in a previous post, the AD from Butler was on the committee, what the hell was this guy doing????!!!Lunardi just published an article on the teams who got snubbed. Check out this comment:
I also wonder if the ACC had more powerful in-room lobbying than the Big East. The latter had three legitimate bubble teams to the ACC's one, yet only Virginia broke through.
Hits, misses from Joe Lunardi and the men's selection committee
We need to talk about Florida Atlantic, Virginia and everything else the men's selection committee got right, and wrong, with the 68-team bracket.www.espn.com
That’s why I said in a previous post, the AD from Butler was on the committee, what the hell was this guy doing????!!!
I am going to Barclays for the Friday night session also. I admit not that excited for this tournament and I will be home to watch all the games Thursday and Friday (except for Friday night).It's truly the first tournament that has no juice to me because of that. Bait and switch is exactly right.
After attending the Duke/Vermont & Wisconsin/James Madison games, I'm probably not watching anything else before or after. Just rooting for the three Big East schools from afar.
Both us and The Hall should've been in.If you think my argument is wrong then there is zero justification for Seton Hall being out. Either you like predictive measures or you like results. Either way either we should be in or SH should be in.
bcollier@butler.edu
I filled out my obligatory bracket 15 minutes after the selection show, and haven't looked at it once since.I am going to Barclays for the Friday night session also. I admit not that excited for this tournament and I will be home to watch all the games Thursday and Friday (except for Friday night).
The NET and Kenpom should follow as well.I wish the term and profession known as “Bracketologists“ goes the same way as the dodo bird.
100%. They made up minds before conf tourneys. Now that they just ignored conf tourneys, don’t be surprised to see top teams start resting starters.Seems committee had teams set and could only play way in over weekend if you won conference tournament.
Truly sad. I went from going to BET semi's thinking I need to go every year, to now being like "why did I spend $225 on a glorified exhibition game?"100%. They made up minds before conf tourneys. Now that they just ignored conf tourneys, don’t be surprised to see top teams start resting starters.
They're not even saying KPI still. Instead just engaging in the same nonsense that doesn't make any consistent sense.
They're not even saying KPI still. Instead just engaging in the same nonsense that doesn't make any consistent sense.
I can't be outraged about STJ not making it but Michigan State was 3-9. Dayton has NO WINS over at-large teams in the NCAA. FAU has one, Arizona, which is equal to ours. This basis just doesn't hold up.St. John's: "When you start talking about St. John's, they were 4-10 in Quad 1. They had seven opportunities at the Top 3 teams from the BE and went just 1-6 with a home win over Creighton and no non-conference win of real note"
He's not wrong about this.
Seton Hall got screwed though, no doubt about it.