BET Talk

So I was right by just using common sense. Not surprising I got an argument from MR. ;) :giggle:
But when two evenly matched teams meet for a third time in the same season, their previous results matter. When the teams split their first two games, the better team won 57.3 percent of the time; when the better team lost the previous two meetings, that team avenged those defeats at a 56.7 percent clip. But when the better team won both previous matchups, the third was a true toss-up — the better teams won only about 49.3 percent of the time.

So if Im reading this right, its not harder to beat a team the 3rd time when the are evenly matched. Its a complete toss up.
 
But when two evenly matched teams meet for a third time in the same season, their previous results matter. When the teams split their first two games, the better team won 57.3 percent of the time; when the better team lost the previous two meetings, that team avenged those defeats at a 56.7 percent clip. But when the better team won both previous matchups, the third was a true toss-up — the better teams won only about 49.3 percent of the time.

So if Im reading this right, its not harder to beat a team the 3rd time when the are evenly matched. Its a complete toss up.
Correct. I think we're probably evenly matched or close enough where it is a 50-50 game.
 
But that's a big difference then claiming they win 77% of the time!
They do overall win 77% of the time. Listen, i dont make up the stats. I just report them.

Dont you find it interesting that a stat everyone regurgitates every March isnt true?
 
They do overall win 77% of the time. Listen, i dont make up the stats. I just report them.

Dont you find it interesting that a stat everyone regurgitates every March isnt true?

1. Yes, there is little overall truth to the "it's hard to beat a team three times" trope.

2. However, it depends on what teams you're talking about. SJU beat DePaul twice; it would not be hard for SJU to beat DePaul a third time (or a fourth or a fifth) because of the quality differential between the two teams. OTOH if you have two teams that are relatively evenly matched, it is more like the coin toss theory: each time you toss the coin there is a 50% chance it will be heads. If you look at them independently, it's 50% each time. But if you look at it as a string of events, the odds of it being heads three times in a row is low.

You can make a good argument that SHU is a better team based on better record vs common opponents and more "quality wins." But they aren't MUCH better, I would mostly throw out the results of the game at SHU, and it remains my opinion that SJU has better talent and depth when properly deployed.

Bottom line is I don't think the results of the prior matchup are all that important in this game: it's a standalone proposition, I think it's pretty much a coin toss, and I expect it to be a rock fight. To me Ledlum is a big key to this game - he's the only player on our roster who I think could play for Holloway based on physical and mental toughness. The rest of the roster is going to need to step up in that department if they want to win.
 
1. Yes, there is little overall truth to the "it's hard to beat a team three times" trope.

2. However, it depends on what teams you're talking about. SJU beat DePaul twice; it would not be hard for SJU to beat DePaul a third time (or a fourth or a fifth) because of the quality differential between the two teams. OTOH if you have two teams that are relatively evenly matched, it is more like the coin toss theory: each time you toss the coin there is a 50% chance it will be heads. If you look at them independently, it's 50% each time. But if you look at it as a string of events, the odds of it being heads three times in a row is low.

You can make a good argument that SHU is a better team based on better record vs common opponents and more "quality wins." But they aren't MUCH better, I would mostly throw out the results of the game at SHU, and it remains my opinion that SJU has better talent and depth when properly deployed.

Bottom line is I don't think the results of the prior matchup are all that important in this game: it's a standalone proposition, I think it's pretty much a coin toss, and I expect it to be a rock fight. To me Ledlum is a big key to this game - he's the only player on our roster who I think could play for Holloway based on physical and mental toughness. The rest of the roster is going to need to step up in that department if they want to win.
What’s the percentage of winning the third game if you lost the first two and in the first game on the road you had your Hall of Fame coach and your starting 2Guard out and you played the second game on basically a neutral court? Statistics are like string bikinis, they show a lot but they don’t show everything.
 
Two things.

1. - Every single freaking year I ask for just one thing. Not an NCAA Championship, not a BE Tournament Championship, just to please stay out of the Wednesday night BE Tournament garbage fest. It's an accomplishment, it means SJU came in fifth (and there were no ties) in a very difficult league with teams who play an identical conference schedule. It's not the ultimate but I have a young granddaughter, and you cannot walk until you can stand, and you cannot run unless you can walk. And yes, while watching her go in one direction with all that I am going in the other direction, but that's not the point. For the longest time, SJU couldn't stand, now they are crawling, progress is progress. How long? The last non-Covid year SJU had a bye I could make it all the way across Union Turnpike by foot with one green light.

I'm floating on air today!

2. A week from now SJU will be BE tournament champs. Before the season this was proclaimed by NCJohnnie and I have no reason to doubt him. I don't forget these things. And no takebacks, NCJohnnie.

This is going to be such a fun week.

But when two evenly matched teams meet for a third time in the same season, their previous results matter. When the teams split their first two games, the better team won 57.3 percent of the time; when the better team lost the previous two meetings, that team avenged those defeats at a 56.7 percent clip. But when the better team won both previous matchups, the third was a true toss-up — the better teams won only about 49.3 percent of the time.

So if Im reading this right, its not harder to beat a team the 3rd time when the are evenly matched. Its a complete toss up.
But if a team beat a team twice so their winning % was 100% of the time technically anything less than that means it’s harder to beat a team the third time :)
 
Funny, I was genuinely looking for some stuff on yesterday’s game and stumbled into something called casual Hoya. Check out some of the comments on here. One guy wants Cooley fired. Sounds a lot like the last 30 years here on Red.Fans. Amazing how losing has an effect on a fan base. We are not alone. Hopefully this is behind us.

 
Funny, I was genuinely looking for some stuff on yesterday’s game and stumbled into something called casual Hoya. Check out some of the comments on here. One guy wants Cooley fired. Sounds a lot like the last 30 years here on Red.Fans. Amazing how losing has an effect on a fan base. We are not alone. Hopefully this is behind us.

You can't ask these fan bases to have patience, when they've been down for so long.

Whoever is going to become Depaul's coach, is going to be in for a rough ride, IMO.
 
You can't ask these fan bases to have patience, when they've been down for so long.

Whoever is going to become Depaul's coach, is going to be in for a rough ride, IMO.
My only thought here is you are 100% right on DePaul…who wants that job?
 
You can't ask these fan bases to have patience, when they've been down for so long.

Whoever is going to become Depaul's coach, is going to be in for a rough ride, IMO.
does DePaul have a base?... Even during our "Down years" (so many to choose from)- feel like there was always 7-8k at MSG at its lowest,..

If a Solid "name" coach (Moser/Hurley) takes the Job... feel like they have a leash of atleast 4 years to get to a .500 record... right?
 
Back
Top