What was often lost in the debate over disappointing early season results under prior regimes (sky is falling v. it's early/meaningless) is that there are certain things great teams - and teams that want to be great - do every single time they hit the floor. True at every level; St. Anthony's and Duke are who they are because they have talent and are well-coached, but they build habits such that watching them play you wouldn't know if it's July or October or March. That type of discipline and care factor is how winning becomes a habit.
What was refreshing about last night was for the first time in a long time (including last year), that approach was evident. There was plenty of rust, especially early, against an inferior team. But there was energy, attention to detail, ball pressure, closing out hard on shooters, huddling quickly and consistently at the foul line, diving for loose balls, and when a guy went flying into the bench the whole team sprinted over to pick him up.
Lineups and rotations are flexible but we didn't waste 40 minutes throwing lineups against the wall in revolving door fashion to see what might work. After the summer and fall and a month of practice you have an idea what it's going to look like and with less than two weeks until game 1 you use every opportunity to develop it. We did that last night too, seemingly based on merit and who gives us the best chance to win and not seniority or anything else. Beautiful.
We may not gel until February, but that isn't going to be set as the public expectation as that can have a trickle down effect on the team. To the contra if you demand the effort I saw last night it eventually becomes contagious and so does winning. We are supposed to beat Baruch by 50 and it was great to see this team do what they are supposed to do so that we aren't having the same old justification debate today. Good for them.