MarkRedman post=457807 said:
fordham96 post=457806 said:
Put a better product on the court and games at MSG become much more exciting and fun even with the opposing team having their fans there as well.
And if you want to schedule major programs in the non-conference obviously you have no choice but MSG. Duke and Kansas are not playing in Carnesecca.
Absolutely, Fordham
This is New York City
Win and they will come
Lose and they will stay home
Saying "win, and we'll fill MSG" is true, but also an oversimplification of the problem.
I contend that playing at MSG right now is preventing the program from taking the next step to winning. In other words, our current agreement with MSG is doing us more harm than good.
Too many teams talk about how MSG is "comfortable" for them, and how it's a "home away from home." The more we keep doing that, the comfortable it will be for opponents, especially when they're only playing there once or twice per year, they're going to give their best. For our guys, it's probably old hat.
Maybe we overachieved last year, because we played everyone at CA? No reason for any team to be insulted by not getting a game at MSG, and if they were upset about it, maybe we didn't get opposing teams best efforts night after night (or at least, they didn't kick it into an extra gear)?
Now, I don't want to do that, but I still think (as I've said before) that the best immediate option is to try and make UBS our full-time home, and hope to do what Seton Hall does at the Rock, and curtain off the upper bowl. Even if you only draw 5K with that, sound reverberation would make the place seem more packed then it actually is.
Right now, WRT to MSG, we are in a position where less (or maybe none) is more.