Making Plays" post=418265 said:
The issue Ewing is having is not his coaching ability, it's managing 18 and 19 year old kids (which is big part of being a college basketball coach). He would have been a much better NBA coach than college coach, because he'd be dealing with grown men and his GM would handle the rosters. In college basketball these days with how easy it is to transfer, if you don't have a great relationship with your kids and know how to manage the different personalities and communicate and relate to them you're going to be in trouble. I think Ewing struggles to do that, that's why you see such high turnover with him. But, as far as X's and O's and his general ability to coach and get the most of out whatever roster he has, he does that really well, no matter who he has on the floor his teams always compete.
I don't see this the same way. Ewing has demonstrated that he is a very good strategic (how to play against a particular opponent) and tactical (in-game adjustment) coach. He know how to get the most out of what he has and how to try to minimize the other team's strengths. On that we agree.
However, I don't think the reason why his program has struggled has been an inability to relate to or manage college-age players. I think that he is demanding of them in much the same way Anderson and many other successful coaches are.
In my opinion the reason why his program has struggled is a sort of Lavin-with-St John's problem. He came in to a program where the cupboard was bare (Lavin at least inherited a team of seniors before he had to start the total rebuild in his second year). He recruited the best talent he could find regardless of character issues, and assumed that he could manage those personalities the same way his mentor John Thompson did. As it turned out, that didn't work for him, he had massive turnover, and that put him where he is now - back at the beginning with little to work with. [This is probably a good place to note that Anderson clearly takes character into consideration in his recruiting and is clearly willing to pass on players that he has character concerns about.]
The test for him is going to be whether the players he's recruited on his second effort will have better character / be better fits for his expectations than the last time. If they are, then Georgetown will be good very soon becuase he does know how to coach and Wahab and Dante Harris are very useful parts that he'll have returning to build around. If they aren't, then that will probably be it for Patrick. But I would bet that he has not repeated his mistakes and that his program is going to rise starting next year.
As for yesterday's game, Nova just did not look like a happy team to me. They executed their offense OK, but there was no crispness to it, no joy in their game, no life. They just didn't look like a team that wanted to be there. Something is off in Wright-land. The game was close because Nova has the same problem we do, they can't handle a big man, and Georgetown (to Ewing's credit) just doesn't give up and go away, they keep fighting. But ultimately I thought it was more about Nova struggling than Georgetown improving, though i guess it was a little bit of both.