Adios Tariq

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote="salty dog" post=277251][quote="Beast of the East" post=277213]We need 2 recruiters on our staff[/quote]

How can you have 2 when you’re paying one 450k to sit home until his contract runs out Dumbest situation going[/quote]

Why can't Mitch Richmond learn how to recruit while Mullin learns how to coach?:pinch: :whistle:
Salty where've you been? We've been on a low salt diet here!!
 
[quote="Class of 72" post=277253][quote="salty dog" postruns out Dumbest situation going[/quote]

Why can't Mitch Richmond learn how to recruit while Mullin learns how to coach?:pinch: :whistle:
Salty where've you been? We've been on a low salt diet here!![/quote]

Took a breather to see if it would help team :) No luck Kind of depressing watching the Tournament and knowing Johnnies aren’t close
 
[quote="salty dog" post=277251][quote="Beast of the East" post=277213]We need 2 recruiters on our staff[/quote]

How can you have 2 when you’re paying one 450k to sit home until his contract runs out Dumbest situation going[/quote]

That's a d2 excuse to an inept D1 problem
 
Holy Toledo . Way too much amateur psychology going on about a Player who thinks greener pastures await him . Maybe they do , maybe they don’t . Owens was our Big Man in height . He played like a small forward , who could block shots but, had trouble handling most BE Front court players , Delgado , Kanter, Bullock , Paschall , etc . He was continually outmuscled and really showed little interest in Rebounding , offensively or defensively . Ponds likely had more rebounds and Simon certainly did . And , for those on here who are turning Owens leaving as another indictment of Mullin , that song is getting wearisome . Very ! Why not blame Mullin for the Electric Bill being too high last month ? Where does the sniping end ? A player , Owens, and his Father think he didn’t get enough run here or , wasn’t enough of a featured player in the offensive schemes . It’s like the 12 year old in CYO whose Father thinks his Kid should be the focal point of the team . College B.B. isn’t about that by the time a player gets to this level . Owens is not a impact player . Ponds is and that will be Shamorie’s Role next year , regardless of who is here and playing along side him . Owens should stay , be happy in his Role and be part of the next year turnaround that will get us to the NCAA . Counting on him to be a dominant front court player in this league is a stretch . Tariq’s limited physicality and thin stature will still be a obstacle against the returning BE Centers . That’s a fact . He is a likeable player but, not a straw stirrer .
 
[quote="SLYFOXX1968" post=277257]Holy Toledo . Way too much amateur psychology going on about a Player who thinks greener pastures await him . Maybe they do , maybe they don’t . Owens was our Big Man in height . He played like a small forward , who could block shots but, had trouble handling most BE Front court players , Delgado , Kanter, Bullock , Paschall , etc . He was continually outmuscled and really showed little interest in Rebounding , offensively or defensively . Ponds likely had more rebounds and Simon certainly did . And , for those on here who are turning Owens leaving as another indictment of Mullin , that song is getting wearisome . Very ! Why not blame Mullin for the Electric Bill being too high last month ? Where does the sniping end ? A player , Owens, and his Father think he didn’t get enough run here or , wasn’t enough of a featured player in the offensive schemes . It’s like the 12 year old in CYO whose Father thinks his Kid should be the focal point of the team . College B.B. isn’t about that by the time a player gets to this level . Owens is not a impact player . Ponds is and that will be Shamorie’s Role next year , regardless of who is here and playing along side him . Owens should stay , be happy in his Role and be part of the next year turnaround that will get us to the NCAA . Counting on him to be a dominant front court player in this league is a stretch . Tariq’s limited physicality and thin stature will still be a obstacle against the returning BE Centers . That’s a fact . He is a likeable player but, not a straw stirrer .[/quote]

My electric bill went up last month because of all the St. John's basketball I watched that included games I dvr'd so I indirectly blame Chris Mullin for that.:lol: :p
 
[quote="Mean Gene" post=277167]Owens was a nice complimentary player but if you look at the way Mullin wants to run the offense he needs guards and athletic wings who can penetrate and shoot the three. Then what he really needs and what thus team lacked was a big 6’9 - 6’10 240 - 260 guy to play D in the paint , rebound and score some put backs and pass a little out of the post. If he has a few offensive post moves all the better. Owens is not that guy and he’s not good enough on the wing to play consistently in the offense Mullin wants to play. [/quote]

I feel like I read this exact post 22 years ago. That guy went on to contribute as a wing at Duke and even played a few years in the NBA. Of course he had to sit a year and then played two. His coach his two years at STJ sucked.
 
Last edited:
The transfer culture in college basketball is fully in place and is as strong as it has ever been. We have greatly benefited from that culture with the additions of Tariq Owens, Marvin Clark and Justin Simon. Additionally we brought in transfers Mikey Dixon and Sedee Keita who will be part of next year's team. Now we are looking at possibly more transfers to supplement next year's roster and beyond.

At this point Tariq may stay at St. John's but is definitely going to explore his options to leave. This should not be a surprise to anyone, because when you live with the benefits of this culture you will have to deal with the defection side too. Personally I am not sure why it makes sense to praise players when they choose to come here and bash them if they choose to go. Like it or not this is just the nature of things in today's game.

The incredible UMBC upset over Virginia was historic and fascinating. It was the first time a number sixteen seed ever beat a number one seed in the NCAA men's tournament. Some believed it would never happen.

I have posted a link to an article (see below) about UMBC's star player Jairus Lyles and his unusual transfer journey that led him to the spotlight of perhaps the biggest upset in the history of the NCAA tournament. The decision for him to stay at UMBC shows what can be possible if you decide to stay the course and not transfer. Maybe we should show this article to any of our players when they are considering leaving St. John's. Players need to know that there can be some real benefits in staying.

[URL][URL]https://www.yahoo.com/spo...om-3-schools-4-coaching-staffs-033448366.html[/URL][/URL]
 
Last edited:
[quote="austour" post=277267][quote="Mean Gene" post=277167]Owens was a nice complimentary player but if you look at the way Mullin wants to run the offense he needs guards and athletic wings who can penetrate and shoot the three. Then what he really needs and what thus team lacked was a big 6’9 - 6’10 240 - 260 guy to play D in the paint , rebound and score some put backs and pass a little out of the post. If he has a few offensive post moves all the better. Owens is not that guy and he’s not good enough on the wing to play consistently in the offense Mullin wants to play. [/quote]

I feel like I read this exact post 22 years ago. That guy went on to contribute as a wing at Duke and even played a few years in the NBA. Of course he had to sit a year and then played two. His coach his two years at STJ sucked.[/quote]

Roshown was 6'8 220lbs out of high school.. He was chiseled.. He would've fit great into Mullins system..2 totally different players with totally different body types and skill sets.. Here's a good read on why he chose SJU even though he didn't want to be here really in the first place... Also why he left..

https://mobile.nytimes.com/1996/11/...ue-though-not-exactly-the-way-he-thought.html
 
[quote="salty dog" post=277251][quote="Beast of the East" post=277213]We need 2 recruiters on our staff[/quote]

How can you have 2 when you’re paying one 450k to sit home until his contract runs out Dumbest situation going[/quote]

They aren't running a candy store. You don't fire a guy without replacing him.no matter what your obligation is.
 
Last edited:
[quote="rawdognyc" post=277273][quote="austour" post=277267][quote="Mean Gene" post=277167]Owens was a nice complimentary player but if you look at the way Mullin wants to run the offense he needs guards and athletic wings who can penetrate and shoot the three. Then what he really needs and what thus team lacked was a big 6’9 - 6’10 240 - 260 guy to play D in the paint , rebound and score some put backs and pass a little out of the post. If he has a few offensive post moves all the better. Owens is not that guy and he’s not good enough on the wing to play consistently in the offense Mullin wants to play. [/quote]

I feel like I read this exact post 22 years ago. That guy went on to contribute as a wing at Duke and even played a few years in the NBA. Of course he had to sit a year and then played two. His coach his two years at STJ sucked.[/quote]

Roshown was 6'8 220lbs out of high school.. He was chiseled.. He would've fit great into Mullins system..2 totally different players with totally different body types and skill sets.. Here's a good read on why he chose SJU even though he didn't want to be here really in the first place... Also why he left..

https://mobile.nytimes.com/1996/11/...ue-though-not-exactly-the-way-he-thought.html[/quote]

Really good post
 
[quote="ghostzapper" post=277269]The transfer culture in college basketball is fully in place and is as strong as it has ever been. We have greatly benefited from that culture with the additions of Tariq Owens, Marvin Clark and Justin Simon. Additionally we brought in transfers Mikey Dixon and Sedee Keita who will be part of next year's team. Now we are looking at possibly more transfers to supplement next year's roster and beyond.

At this point Tariq may stay at St. John's but is definitely going to explore his options to leave. This should not be a surprise to anyone, because when you live with the benefits of this culture you will have to deal with the defection side too. Personally I am not sure why it makes sense to praise players when they choose to come here and bash them if they choose to go. Like it or not this is just the nature of things in today's game.

The incredible UMBC upset over Virginia was historic and fascinating. It was the first time a number sixteen seed ever beat a number one seed in the NCAA men's tournament. Some believed it would never happen.

I have posted a link to an article (see below) about UMBC's star player Jairus Lyles and his unusual transfer journey that led him to the spotlight of perhaps the biggest upset in the history of the NCAA tournament. The decision for him to stay at UMBC shows what can be possible if you decide to stay the course and not transfer. Maybe we should show this article to any of our players when they are considering leaving St. John's. Players need to know that there can be some real benefits in staying.

[URL][URL]https://www.yahoo.com/spo...om-3-schools-4-coaching-staffs-033448366.html[/URL][/URL][/quote]

Agree that the transfer culture is definitely at its peak, however even so can you point to another program that consistently loses as many players as us not counting a coaching change? Again, I feel like many in our fanbase sugarcoat things way too much at times IMO. Is it really likely that this is all by chance and has absolutely zero to do with coaching? Which one of those is more likely? Jay Wright goes out and gets 3 star kids who did not get scouted much and by the time they are seniors (usually sooner), they are absolute studs. Spellman is a freshman playing like a senior. My point is you know good coaching when you see it. You can clearly see their development. We say Tariq's but he also worked a lot with his father outside of official practices so who knows who gets some of that credit. Yakwe regressed, Amar regressed, Ponds regressed (better shooting numbers as a freshman), Clark and Simon are transfers, etc. The only evidence I see is regression overall in terms of player development which is alarming given the fact that many players get better naturally even with an average coach.

There is smoke coming from the kitchen and many of us don't seem interested in checking the oven due to fear of what they may find: that maybe, just maybe recruits and current players are losing faith in our coaching staff.
 
[quote="Class of 72" post=277253][quote="salty dog" post=277251][quote="Beast of the East" post=277213]We need 2 recruiters on our staff[/quote]

How can you have 2 when you’re paying one 450k to sit home until his contract runs out Dumbest situation going[/quote]

Why can't Mitch Richmond learn how to recruit while Mullin learns how to coach?:pinch: :whistle:
Salty where've you been? We've been on a low salt diet here!![/quote]

Toughest job in the world is selling. People buy bmw and lexus based on sales inertia, because others have bought it and not what it is. Until you've had success in a program, selling it is the hardest thing. All kids want to know is how am I getting to the NBA. If your team is in the dance every year and if you have sent a bunch to the pros success builds on itself.

Honestly the Mullin bickering wont be answered any time soon. Unless he quits he will likely be here for 6 seasons. If someone ekse is here in year 7 you were right. If not...
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=277281][quote="Class of 72" post=277253][quote="salty dog" post=277251][quote="Beast of the East" post=277213]We need 2 recruiters on our staff[/quote]

How can you have 2 when you’re paying one 450k to sit home until his contract runs out Dumbest situation going[/quote]

Why can't Mitch Richmond learn how to recruit while Mullin learns how to coach?:pinch: :whistle:
Salty where've you been? We've been on a low salt diet here!![/quote]

Toughest job in the world is selling. People buy bmw and lexus based on sales inertia, because others have bought it and not what it is. Until you've had success in a program, selling it is the hardest thing. All kids want to know is how am I getting to the NBA. If your team is in the dance every year and if you have sent a bunch to the pros success builds on itself.

Honestly the Mullin bickering wont be answered any time soon. Unless he quits he will likely be here for 6 seasons. If someone ekse is here in year 7 you were right. If not...[/quote]

Just traded in my BMW for an Accord Hybrid...miss driving it but now I have peace of mind knowing I won't owe up to 7k+ if something goes wrong off warranty! Pretty cool car too. Anyway, I feel like there's always the war between the heart and the mind/logic. In my (and most if not all SJ fans') heart I want Mullin to succeed badly. I remember when he was first hired I was having daydreams of a Disney-like fairytale as he comes to save his school. In my heart, Mullin can do it (with lots of help). But then I look at the results...the empirical evidence...overall records, stats, etc. Some people will look at the overall record in the Mullin era and explain the multitude of reasons that it is clearly not due to bad coaching. Others will look at the overall record like Herman Edwards...you are what your record says you are. I'm not saying one is right and one is wrong, but IMO I tend to side more with the Herm philosophy. Please don't confuse negativity (looking for the bad even when things are good) with realism (looking at overall record/stats and basing your opinion on that).
 
[quote="Class of 72" post=277260][quote="SLYFOXX1968" post=277257]Holy Toledo . Way too much amateur psychology going on about a Player who thinks greener pastures await him . Maybe they do , maybe they don’t . Owens was our Big Man in height . He played like a small forward , who could block shots but, had trouble handling most BE Front court players , Delgado , Kanter, Bullock , Paschall , etc . He was continually outmuscled and really showed little interest in Rebounding , offensively or defensively . Ponds likely had more rebounds and Simon certainly did . And , for those on here who are turning Owens leaving as another indictment of Mullin , that song is getting wearisome . Very ! Why not blame Mullin for the Electric Bill being too high last month ? Where does the sniping end ? A player , Owens, and his Father think he didn’t get enough run here or , wasn’t enough of a featured player in the offensive schemes . It’s like the 12 year old in CYO whose Father thinks his Kid should be the focal point of the team . College B.B. isn’t about that by the time a player gets to this level . Owens is not a impact player . Ponds is and that will be Shamorie’s Role next year , regardless of who is here and playing along side him . Owens should stay , be happy in his Role and be part of the next year turnaround that will get us to the NCAA . Counting on him to be a dominant front court player in this league is a stretch . Tariq’s limited physicality and thin stature will still be a obstacle against the returning BE Centers . That’s a fact . He is a likeable player but, not a straw stirrer .[/quote]

My electric bill went up last month because of all the St. John's basketball I watched that included games I dvr'd so I indirectly blame Chris Mullin for that.:lol: :p[/quote]
I blame Obama.:(
 
[quote="Mike Zaun" post=277280]Jay Wright goes out and gets 3 star kids who did not get scouted much and by the time they are seniors (usually sooner), they are absolute studs. [/quote]

Nova recruiting since 2011

5-star recruits: 2
4-star recruits: 11
3-star recruits: 3
2-star recruit: 1



2011

****
****
***

2012

****
****

2013

****
****
***

2014

****
****

2015

*****
****
****

2016

*****
***

2017

****
****
**
 
[quote="Mike Zaun" post=277280][quote="ghostzapper" post=277269]The transfer culture in college basketball is fully in place and is as strong as it has ever been. We have greatly benefited from that culture with the additions of Tariq Owens, Marvin Clark and Justin Simon. Additionally we brought in transfers Mikey Dixon and Sedee Keita who will be part of next year's team. Now we are looking at possibly more transfers to supplement next year's roster and beyond.

At this point Tariq may stay at St. John's but is definitely going to explore his options to leave. This should not be a surprise to anyone, because when you live with the benefits of this culture you will have to deal with the defection side too. Personally I am not sure why it makes sense to praise players when they choose to come here and bash them if they choose to go. Like it or not this is just the nature of things in today's game.

The incredible UMBC upset over Virginia was historic and fascinating. It was the first time a number sixteen seed ever beat a number one seed in the NCAA men's tournament. Some believed it would never happen.

I have posted a link to an article (see below) about UMBC's star player Jairus Lyles and his unusual transfer journey that led him to the spotlight of perhaps the biggest upset in the history of the NCAA tournament. The decision for him to stay at UMBC shows what can be possible if you decide to stay the course and not transfer. Maybe we should show this article to any of our players when they are considering leaving St. John's. Players need to know that there can be some real benefits in staying.

[URL][URL]https://www.yahoo.com/spo...om-3-schools-4-coaching-staffs-033448366.html[/URL][/URL][/quote]

Agree that the transfer culture is definitely at its peak, however even so can you point to another program that consistently loses as many players as us not counting a coaching change? Again, I feel like many in our fanbase sugarcoat things way too much at times IMO. Is it really likely that this is all by chance and has absolutely zero to do with coaching? Which one of those is more likely? Jay Wright goes out and gets 3 star kids who did not get scouted much and by the time they are seniors (usually sooner), they are absolute studs. Spellman is a freshman playing like a senior. My point is you know good coaching when you see it. You can clearly see their development. We say Tariq's but he also worked a lot with his father outside of official practices so who knows who gets some of that credit. Yakwe regressed, Amar regressed, Ponds regressed (better shooting numbers as a freshman), Clark and Simon are transfers, etc. The only evidence I see is regression overall in terms of player development which is alarming given the fact that many players get better naturally even with an average coach.

There is smoke coming from the kitchen and many of us don't seem interested in checking the oven due to fear of what they may find: that maybe, just maybe recruits and current players are losing faith in our coaching staff.[/quote]

Think you're reading way too much into this. Mullin came in with a bare cupboard, and had to take what he could get in year 1. So it was no surprise he was already recruiting over those players with better players for year 2 and beyond. Perfect example, both Sima and Ellison were rumored to have transferred because they were getting outplayed in practice by incoming recruits and knew they'd lose playing time. Mussini and Freudenberg, who knows how long they even ever intended to stay in the US, but it's not like they went to play for other schools. They went back home. Owens is a 5th year grad transfer. Just like we take in transfers, we have the ability to lose them too. Remember in year 1 when we took on Durand Johnson and Ron Mvoika?

I dont even see how it's fair to compare to Nova. They've been a winning program, we have not. Kids are more likely to stay at a winner.
 
[quote="fun" post=277285][quote="Mike Zaun" post=277280]Jay Wright goes out and gets 3 star kids who did not get scouted much and by the time they are seniors (usually sooner), they are absolute studs. [/quote]

Nova recruiting since 2011

5-star recruits: 2
4-star recruits: 11
3-star recruits: 3
2-star recruit: 1



2011

****
****
***

2012

****
****

2013

****
****
***

2014

****
****

2015

*****
****
****

2016

*****
***

2017

****
****
**[/quote]

And to add to this, it's not just about the rating out of HS. It's about fitting the system. Just look at Donte DiVincenzo, a 3/4 star top 200 player (similar to Greg Williams). He is a player that fits the Villanova system perfectly and is going to blow up next season when Nova loses Brunson. And then next season and the year after that watch for Collin Gillespie to blow up (3 star top 300). You pair that with the occasional 5 star and you have a top 5 team year after year.
 
[quote="SJU14" post=277289][quote="fun" post=277285][quote="Mike Zaun" post=277280]Jay Wright goes out and gets 3 star kids who did not get scouted much and by the time they are seniors (usually sooner), they are absolute studs. [/quote]

Nova recruiting since 2011

5-star recruits: 2
4-star recruits: 11
3-star recruits: 3
2-star recruit: 1



2011

****
****
***

2012

****
****

2013

****
****
***

2014

****
****

2015

*****
****
****

2016

*****
***

2017

****
****
**[/quote]

And to add to this, it's not just about the rating out of HS. It's about fitting the system. Just look at Donte DiVincenzo, a 3/4 star top 200 player (similar to Greg Williams). He is a player that fits the Villanova system perfectly and is going to blow up next season when Nova loses Brunson. And then next season and the year after that watch for Collin Gillespie to blow up (3 star top 300). You pair that with the occasional 5 star and you have a top 5 team year after year.[/quote]

DiVincenzo was rated no lower than than #124 per Rivals (#120) and 247 Sports (#124)..... The two best recruiting sites. Gillespie was #200 per 247. Spellman is also a top 20 recruit.

I've seen fans on this board and a few others who believe Wright is primarily doing damage with 3-star recruits. I've long stated it's a huge misnomer.

He might not get the recruits like your typical blue-blood, but he lands a bunch of 4-star kids. They tend to vary from high-rated to low-rated 4-stars, but a 4-star, nonetheless.

He and his staff does coach 'em up, as evident from watching how they play. But, he isn't nor hasn't been doing this with a load of 3-star kids.
 
Last edited:
[quote="MJDinkins" post=277291][quote="SJU14" post=277289][quote="fun" post=277285][quote="Mike Zaun" post=277280]Jay Wright goes out and gets 3 star kids who did not get scouted much and by the time they are seniors (usually sooner), they are absolute studs. [/quote]

Nova recruiting since 2011

5-star recruits: 2
4-star recruits: 11
3-star recruits: 3
2-star recruit: 1



2011

****
****
***

2012

****
****

2013

****
****
***

2014

****
****

2015

*****
****
****

2016

*****
***

2017

****
****
**[/quote]

And to add to this, it's not just about the rating out of HS. It's about fitting the system. Just look at Donte DiVincenzo, a 3/4 star top 200 player (similar to Greg Williams). He is a player that fits the Villanova system perfectly and is going to blow up next season when Nova loses Brunson. And then next season and the year after that watch for Collin Gillespie to blow up (3 star top 300). You pair that with the occasional 5 star and you have a top 5 team year after year.[/quote]

DiVincenzo was rated no lower than than #124 per Rivals (#120) and 247 Sports (#124)..... The two best recruiting sites. Gillespie was #200 per 247. Spellman is also a top 20 recruit.

I've seen fans on this board and a few others who believe Wright is primarily doing damage with 3-star recruits. I've long stated it's a huge misnomer.

He might not get the recruits like your typical blue-blood, but he lands a bunch of 4-star kids. They tend to vary from high-rated to low-rated 4-stars, but a 4-star, nonetheless.

He and his staff does coach 'em up, as evident from watching how they play. But, he isn't nor hasn't been doing this with a load of 3-star kids.[/quote]
Very true
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top